QOTW

| 9 Comments

"They try themselves, certain of acquittal. They claim persecution while suggesting their opponents should be silenced." - Peter Foster


9 Comments

Why doesn't this Suzuki TR_D just go to China or Russia and go after the real polluters and see how far his Govt. subsidised complaining gets him.
He is welcome the take along his Lemmings.

The whole thing happened at the ROM in Toronto, so naturally he got an adoring crowd. Townies don't know where their food, fuel or power comes from, but they do watch a lot of CBC. "Oooh, he's famous!" Argh.

If they tried it out here in Windmill country, my neighbors would have roasted him like a turkey. Lots of mailboxes in the county have "STOP THE WIND TURBINES!" on a red stop sign nailed to the post.

Lots of those signs showing up here in town as well. Send Suzuki to the hinterlands to see who's who and what they think of his fraudulent lies. If he ever wanted to walk the talk he would agree to spend a month living in one of the homes situated near a wind turbine.

"They reach consensus by having conversations in echo chambers. They try themselves, certain of acquittal. They claim persecution while suggesting their opponents should be silenced. If you want to know what’s wrong with the IPCC, and why there is still no real debate over climate, the trial of David Suzuki exposed it in microcosm."

Very concise summation. Now, if every one of us will send this article to our MP,especially a Conservative MP, we just might make them uncomfortable enough to start reconsidering their addiction to carbon taxes.

He should come to my house. He'd leave here a changed man.

I also amuse myself, a la Kate!

This was my reaction to Heather Mallick’s Toronto Star column on the Suzuki “trial.” There’s no bloody way the Star will print this, but I hope Heather enjoyed my immortal prose.

I’m particularly pleased with the Hoffa and Gotti jury tampering references. Also the phrase “simple presence of Heather Mallick" strikes my fancy.

“David Suzuki adopted the well tested techniques used by Jimmy Hoffa and John Gotti to ensure a favourable outcome at his mock “trial.” The simple presence of Heather Mallick, a fawning Suzuki fan, on the panel provides clear evidence of jury tampering and ample justification for declaring a mistrial.

Readily available on the Internet is David Suzuki’s recent appearance on the Australian Broadcasting Corporation’s “Q & A” show. There the fix was not in and informed questioning by a scientifically literate audience produced a dramatically different outcome – comments from Australian viewers about Suzuki’s shallow understanding of climate change and genetic engineering were scathing. This is well worth a look – Suzuki never allows himself to be exposed to unscreened challenges from well informed critics in Canada.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hKdmQMVJ70

"They try themselves, certain of acquittal. They claim persecution while suggesting their opponents should be silenced."

Sounds like Islam. Its no accident the left is in bed with Islamic colonialism.
They think alike , even when it comes to mass murder to lying. Both always the victim never the instigator.

These are the actions of the watermelon poseurs of the institutional left. I wonder sometimes whether they are more fascist than socialist given that book burning would fit in with their censorious nature and then I think of Solzhenitsyn's words in the Gulag Archipelago. In it, he contrasted the Gestapo with the NKVD (predecessor to KGB) and asserted that the Gestapo, despite its atrocities was actually interested in ascertaining guilt or innocence before convicting. Whereas the NKVD were only interested in the convictions, and the more the merrier as they had Gulags to fill. The Watermelon Poseurs tend to fit in with the later more than the former as they refuse to hear opposing or potentially conflicting thought. Brown shirts or Red stars, both repugnant variants of statism - probably irrelevant.

Another good reason to end all taxpayer funding of the arts.

Close but no cigar. We don't jail people for environmentalisn, we do jail people for fraud.

Leave a comment

Archives

November 2016

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

Recent Comments

  • https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawlZzNtHyup7_8Q07SQeO82ltdw97F2PqYw: Close but no cigar. We don't jail people for environmentalisn, read more
  • John Chittick: These are the actions of the watermelon poseurs of the read more
  • Revnant Dream: "They try themselves, certain of acquittal. They claim persecution while read more
  • Political Junkie: I also amuse myself, a la Kate! This was my read more
  • The Phantom: He should come to my house. He'd leave here a read more
  • don morris: "They reach consensus by having conversations in echo chambers. They read more
  • bitter clinger: Lots of those signs showing up here in town as read more
  • The Phantom: The whole thing happened at the ROM in Toronto, so read more
  • capt_bob: Why doesn't this Suzuki TR_D just go to China or read more