In The Mail

| 23 Comments


Jack Turner lives a content life as a devoted family man and small-business owner. That is, until the day he confronts a politician at a staged rally. When footage of the encounter goes viral, the self-described "everyday, hard-workin' American" becomes an unlikely celebrity.



23 Comments

In the mail to whom ? I don't understand. I this a sales pitch or is there a story behind this post ?

".... he realizes his greatest threat isn’t a single candidate but the Party itself—a powerful enemy who will stop at nothing to ensure his defeat."

For a work of fiction, he got at least one fact of modern politics 100% correct. Parties have WAY to much power in our current systems.

I remember the Stephen Harper who voluntarily put his Reform leadership on the line with the greater ideal of combining the right as his goal. He had me fooled he was the real deal back then. Now, he has clearly shown he is no more than just another party hack who consistently puts his party's fortunes in the next election ahead of his country's fortunes today.

Harper can lie, cover-up, campaign 24/7/365, waste billions, grow bureaucracy, bus-chuck associates and line piggies at the trough with the best of them, generally creating an air of arrogance challenging the likes of Mulroney and Chretien. And that is not an easy achievement.

LEFT....RIGHT....LEFT....RIGHT, small-minded, self-interested partisan *ssholes are marching the free world right over the abyss.

"Canadian Observer" - has it not occurred to you that Stephen Harper could believe that the conservative policies he espouses are, in fact, best for the country's fortunes and therefore the CPC retaining power is best for the country?

The Democrat/Liberal concept of power at any price and other views be dam*ed is the destructive force.

Aviator,

You are a prime example of what partisanship does to a free thinking mind.

Harper has a majority now. Where is all this sweet conservative goodness we've been promised for decades? AND, thanks to PMSH's embarrassing Senate fiasco, how many decades before we see another conservative majority? NOW is the time for action, instead we watch yet another political party in 110% damage control mode looking out for themselves, f*ck what ails us everyday folk.

Anybody who calls Harper's current fiasco "good government" deserves a slap.

A friggin' hard one, too.

CO. Yes ... good government. I would like to see you try.

You should turn off the CBC once in a while.

A Senator paid back expenses. Only a lefty can call that a fiasco.

Wow, you really don't get it, do you?

Anyone would have to be a real f*cking idiot to think my posts were from a leftard. That, or you would have to be a real hardcore partisan, which experience is showing me are about the same. Open your ears and eyes, LOTS of conservatives are pissed at how Harper is squandering this majority. How could you possibly not be aware of this?!?!

But that blindness defines so many hardcore partisans such as yourself, doesn't it? You made no rebuttal of any kind to my points, just some bigoted, tired, thoughtless rhetoric.(I especially liked the schoolyard taunt quality of "I would like to see you try")

Get back to me when you've made an honest effort to understand my point and have something intelligent to add.

When did Harper run on your view of "conservatism?" He set out his platforms and carried them out. Harper is a classical liberal, never has, never will be, a "conservative" in the ideological sense, any more than the Grits are "liberal." At least the NDP admit they're socialists, sort of. Ideologically conservative politicians are unelectable in Canada with their true electoral support nationally barely filling a small room.

His priority has always been the middle class, contrary to the meme-filled BS of Justin's commercials. Get it straight, any politician running on a ideologically conservative platform will guarantee power for the leftists and statists in this country who still think they are so wise and the majority supports them. Check out BC for evidence of this.

shamrock


I think you just gave CO that "slap" he was talking about:-)))


Yes, I'm some what disappointed in Harper, but he's governing the whole country, and there ain't many of us true conservatives out here, and needs to consider that when he makes decisions. And you are rite, Harpo is a centrist/moderate liberal, and would have been a bleeding lefty 50 years ago. Ppl like CO fail the understand the shifty social position of the population.

CO, You have called for those who disagree with you to get a "slap", "a friggin hard one, too", "a frickin idiot".

I am happy to debate those of a calm demeanor, however you are not looking for a debate. You are acting like the schoolyard bully. I make it a point to not debate a bully.

If you are conservative, I apologize for calling you a "lefty" and for being an extreme CBC watcher.

Now I am curious how a conservative like you could work themselves up to such an angry rant. Perhaps you have forgotten the Liberal Party of Canada under Martin, Chretien, Turner, Trudeau.

Harper is a classical liberal

Nothing says 'classical liberal' like massively expanded government, bailing out GM, putting people in jail for drug use, preserving supply management. Next time, try to know WTF you're talking about before using words you don't understand.

CO: welcome to my world. It's hard being lucid and objective in a sea of patisan retards. Partisanship is mental illness and it's KILLED Canada's political right. We are doing the exact same thing American contards did when they supported Bush. They made Obama possible. Apparently Canadian Contards are too dumb to learn from history.

Rumour has it that income splitting beyond pension income is coming before the next election. This would certainly help middle class Canadians especially those where the wife's income has been limited because she has opted to work part-time in order to look after the kids. I am sure this will not be popular with the N.D.P.

This would certainly help middle class Canadians

Those that are married. Oh yay, more special goodies for favored sections of the electorate.
The Cons also want to implement some idiotic tax credits for working out or music or other stupid crap. Thanks for fracking up our relatively simple tax code Contards.

Afraid my view on Harper is not a lot different from COs. Sure, I'll give him due credit for trashing the gun registry and the CWB and Sec. 13. And he's had the balls to stand up for Israel. But he's added billions to our debt, screwed up the F35 acquisitions, and hasn't had the courage to speak out against the AGW BS.

And a lot of us are waiting for him to come good on his 2006 promise to provide Canadians with effective property rights.

Don't knock those of us who actually read the CBC. We ascribe to the tenant that it's prudent to keep your friends close but to keep your enemies closer.
Bottom line from me. I want the Reform Party back!!

Excuse me, but what is this discussion doing on this thread? What part of off-topic did you miss?


peterj - It's just a simple book promotion, I post a blurb whenever someone sends me a review copy.

Geez Kate, blurb a children's book next time and see what happens!

Ahso !!

The character sounds like Joe the Plumber to me.

LAS oh LAS, please research the political definition of classical liberalism - the attempt to balance liberty and economic freedom in a mixed economy - aka libertarianism though many mistakenly think that is right wing wacko anarchism. Well fine, Harper isn't a classical classical liberal - he's more pragmatic that that - in fact he's not ideological at all (he may have been in his past but saw its futility) so those attacks on him are quite ironic IMO. Purist ideological politics don't work in the modern political culture, it's too easy to stereotype and attack. It killed the NDP in BC. Pragmatism and sound policy is the order of the day - peace, order and good government - Harper represents our only hope at the moment even though his mix includes more government than many here would like.

Political choice is now more like a smorgasbord and Harper, though his menu might not have everyone's favourites, still puts on the best spread. The alternatives offer even less choice, less tasty food, poorer service and higher prices.

Please please stop substituting reality with your political tribalism. FACT: Harper is running to the left of the Chretien-Martin Administration FACT: 'lesser evil' is still evil

It is because of people like you that Obama took power. You did that.

"It is because of people like you that Obama took power. You did that"

Doubt it, Shamrock's probably Caucasian, alive, Irish, male and over 25. Bet he doesn't even have a Obama phone. Does not meet the criteria for a Obama voter.

No he did something a lot more important than vote for Obama: he supported Bush. Without Bush, Obama is a leftist pipedream.

Shorter Shamrock: Massive government expansion, deficits, and interference in the private sector are bad when Liberals do it but when Cons do it it's 'pragmatism'.

Principals besting principles.

Very inane remarks LAS. I had nothing to do with Obama getting elected, I don't vote in US elections, obviously, and if I did he would never get my vote. Harper is far from destroying the electability of the "right" in Canada - he will win easily in 2015, unless he listens to your advice that is LAS. BTW, classical liberals understand the need for limited government; it seems your view is any government involvement is "massive." Your comment that Harper runs to the left of Chretien-Martin is so ludicrous it doesn't warrant a comment, other than it betrays an absolute, either/or view of politics I don't share. Comparing the Romney meltdown with Harper's performance is equally ludicrous.

Your utter ignorance of political ideology and its application in modern political cultures is your failing not mine, nor has it anything to do with political "tribalism" except in your mind, which of course is your right until the progressives take it away with jail time for dissenting views. Like I said before I would rather eat at Chez Harper than at the progressive soup kitchen.

Like I said LAS, it is your policy shopping list that would get Harper removed and condemn our country to Kyoto UN kleptocratic world government under the likes of JT, Mulcair, Lizzie May and David Suzuki. Sorry if pragmatism and flexibility don't meet your purist political pandering - actually I thank God for it for keeping the socialist hounds at bay.

In your search for ideological purity, your and your ilk would do more to get progressive utopians like JT and Mulcair elected. Why do you refuse to recognize this obvious evidence? I think you believe what you say but your views could be misinterpreted as a progressive/statist false flag.

Oh peterj, good one, though with the bad cold I have today the "living" part seems debatable.

Leave a comment

Archives

November 2016

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

Recent Comments

  • Shamrock: Very inane remarks LAS. I had nothing to do with read more
  • LAS: No he did something a lot more important than vote read more
  • peterj: "It is because of people like you that Obama took read more
  • LAS: Please please stop substituting reality with your political tribalism. FACT: read more
  • Shamrock: LAS oh LAS, please research the political definition of classical read more
  • Ken (Kulak): The character sounds like Joe the Plumber to me. read more
  • peterj: Ahso !! read more
  • GaryinWpg: Geez Kate, blurb a children's book next time and see read more
  • Kate: Excuse me, but what is this discussion doing on this read more
  • bitter clinger: Don't knock those of us who actually read the CBC. read more