I Was Sitting By The Phone, Mr. Harper

| 26 Comments

In all, the Senate spent $528,842 to recoup about $520,000 in expense claims from senators...


26 Comments

Yet still light years ahead of the Ontario Liberals

A net loss of 8k on a government operation is like a win for the taxpayer...

"Yet still light years ahead of the Ontario Liberals"

That may be so but do the math on what the CBC costs taxpayers ... per day ....

It ain't pretty.

Senators asked for cookies.
PMO said fine.
Press noticed missing cookies.
PMO said cookies Senators stole musts go back.
PMO replaced cookies & pointed finger at Senators.
Everybody points fingers at everybody else.
Cookies, Senate, PMO stale anyway.

Yeah well, ya can thank Cretin for covertly creating another branch of government.....outside the Constitution....the PMO.

This whole thing is asinine from the start. It appears the people managing the affairs of the Senate couldn't manage a two hole outhouse. Those who sign the cheques and approve expenses should also take responsibility. Some are not doing their job or have no respect for taxpayers money.

As for the vote on whether to suspend them without pay, that's one that may not pass if there is going to be further auditing of all Senators which is the only fair thing to do. If others in that place have been living too large for what's allowed they are not going to vote for suspension without pay.

Can I just add a silly question? Does anyone anywhere believe that Mike Duffy, after a lifetime of CTV top pay and several years of Senate paycheques, didn't/doesn't have $90,000 of HIS OWN money to pay back what he 'liberated' from expense accounts? His original claim of poverty is laughable.

What SESAME STREET COOKIE MONSTER got scooped...oh say it ain't so!

We now return to children's programming courtesy of Parliament Hill...

Sesame Street: Share It Maybe
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qTIGg3I5y8

"Me sell me soul for cookie" (Appropriate for All Saints Day)

You call and share with me maybe?


Cheers

Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief

1st Saint Nicolaas Army
Army Group “True North”

catch22 "Can I just add a silly question? Does anyone anywhere believe that Mike Duffy, after a lifetime of CTV top pay and several years of Senate paycheques, didn't/doesn't have $90,000 of HIS OWN money to pay back what he 'liberated' from expense accounts? His original claim of poverty is laughable."

I know many people who make $ 100 - 200 - $300,000 and do not have a T5 slip meaning they earned $100 of interest. They are a couple cheques away from being broke. It's not all that unusual.

I was listening to a radio call-in show at lunchtime, and one caller phoned in to note that Joe Fontana has been charged with misappropriation of public funds, and the media pays no attention to him whatsoever, while of course Rob Ford and the Senate play in the headlines over & over again. He also rightfully noted that Fontana is a Liberal while the other items involve conservatives. The host thanked him for the call, then after the hang-up, *covered for the media* by invoking the "we have to cover what people are interested in" tripe, then took it further by saying people would be bored by the Fontana story and not care. Hence why nobody covers it.

I'm lucky I didn't wreck my car, I was so enraged.

The media are our *enemies* in this country, plain and simple.

When Duffman said he didn't have the money to pay it back I believe him, and he wouldn't be the first to spend his cash 'earned' from government in an improvident spendthrift way.

Meanwhile the lame stream media ignores the fact that Mac Harb has lived for over 20 years in Centre Town within walking distance of Parliament Hill, deliberately bought a property just beyond the distance so he could qualify for expenses, didn't live on the property and then sold 99.9% of the property so that he could keep claiming 100% of the allowable expenses on .1% of the property. The major difference between Harb and Duffy is Harb was appointed by the Cretch for being a loyal Liberal MP.

If all Harper did was innocently replace cookies, why does he lie and change stories all the time? Why didn't he tell everyone in the first place?

the Senate spent $528,842 to recoup about $520,000 in expense claims from senators...

Good. Accountability is well worth the expense.

Typical SDA hypocrisy. If the Liberals did this you people would never shut up about it.

I can't find any information on Duffy's home in Ottawa,where he has apparently lived for 30 years or so,Parliamentary correspondent since 1974. Am I to assume Duffy didn't buy a house or condo, but lived in his car or slept in a Dumpster behind the nearest Sobeys?

It strains credibility to believe the highly-paid Duffy didn't buy some type of accommodation early in his career in Ottawa,and further that he has no equity in a home in Ottawa.

Most ordinary people of that age,60's, I know could raise $90,000 from the equity on their home,and so could Duffy,unless he was an absolutely terrible manager of his own money.If so, why appoint a spenthrift and wastrel to the Senate?

The story is unfolding in a haphazard and dishonest way,with "the story" changing daily. This whole episode smacks of coverup and cover-your-ass.

Wright is supposed to be an able and intelligent businessman.If so,why didn't he simply do the right thing,and tell Duffy to bail himself out of his troubles?

Had Duffy failed to find financing,what result could possibly look worse for the CPC and PM Harper than the scenario we have now.

This is starting to look like the last days of Mulroney.

This is what happens when the hyena media concoct a Conservative "scandal: more wasted taxpayer dollars and the Librano$, who've misappropriated far more taxpayer dollars, are given a free pass.

I'm getting bloody sick and tired of this lopsided crap. All senators should have to own up to misreported expenses -- and the execrable hyena media should stop playing kissy-kissy with the Librano$/Dippers by reporting their scandals, not just for one day but for as long as they keep c/Conservative "scandals" in the news, which is ad nauseum.

Canadians are being royally screwed by members of the unelected consensus-media party, who excoriate only c/Conservatives and give a free pass to Leftards. The Canadian media have forfeited their credibility in return for being in the good "graces" -- and pockets -- of political "progressives" (sic). 'Not a smart or principled move.

Very true and very sad, but there is not a damn thing we are going to do about it except not support them financially, support only media that is objective, let them know we are on to their perfidy.

The media has always been biased since newspapers were established in Canada. George Brown (?) was a notorious grit when he started the Globe. Brown ended up purchasing amalgamated conservative newspapers, The Toronto Mail and Toronto Empire. The Toronto Star was an even more liberal newspaper and on the radical side. The Toronto Telegram was the only conservative newspaper until 1971 when it folded, primarily due to union problems. There was nothing that could be considered national in scope until ntil the National Post appeared.

The media didn't concoct a Conservative scandal,they took advantage of a Conservative scandal,which every Conservative politician knows they are hell bent on doing.They knew the arena before they entered it,and they knew the game was fixed.

Conservative always claim to hold the moral high ground in politics,and they have to live up to their own standards or face the tidal wave of bad publicity they know they can expect from the MSM.

Harper made a mistake in judgement when he appointed the trio of Wallin,Brazeau,and Duffy,period.

Now,with the PMO involved,it's not a defence to bleat about the Liberals past malfeasance,the media and most voters don't care;that was then,this is now.

Provincial politics is separate from federal politics, not much sense in crying that the MSM isn't giving the Ontario government a raking over the coals for the gangster McGuinty and his boondoggles.

The Big Show is the Senate,Harper/PMO.If Harper can't pull a rabbit out of his hat in the next short while,this is going to continue until 2015,when the MSM will help a gullible electorate put Justin Trudeau in the PM's Office.

if the entitled senators had been allowed to continue bilking taxpayers the gap would be much wider

Er, don, the "Harper was evil for appointing crooks" line was last week. This week it's, "Harper is evil for trying to fire these wonderful people". Do try to keep up, will you?

"when the MSM will help a gullible electorate put Justin Trudeau in the PM's Office."

I have seen this apocalyptic prediction many times on this site. Perhaps I'm guilty of whistling past the graveyard, but I honestly can't see it coming to pass. Despite the odd minor stumble, mini scandal or ersatz fiasco contrived and prolonged by an unfriendly media, PMSH has proven to be an excellent leader and is undoubtedly the best Prime Minister that this country has ever had. While the rest of the world is experiencing a sh*t storm of epic proportions, Canadians remain remarkably comfortable and insulated from everyone else's problems. I think that most Canadians recognize this and will vote accordingly especially when considering that the leaders of the other parties are absolutely, totally useless in every sense of the word.

I tend to think like you.

I figure that a whole lot of l/Liberals will publicly state they'll vote for the Shiny Pony but once inside the voting booth, will put the X beside the Conservative candidate because they know that it's the Harper government that will protect their investments, not, in a thousand years, The Toddler's financially promiscuous Librano$, even though they party, cottage, and ski with said Librano$:

Liberal on the party scene, Conservative in the voting booth.

The Liberals do this sort of thing so often that it's second nature to them.

And let's not forget how they propped up a senator with Alzheimer's Disease:

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2012/08/28/liberal_senator_worked_after_being_declared_legally_incompetent_because_of_alzheimers.html

I agree with your description of Harper,but unfortunately a majority of Canadians are opposed to him or on the fence.

It may be "apocalyptic" to predict defeat, but it's better to prepare yourself for a major battle than to assume you already have it won because of the ability of your leader.

ebt, I don't believe for a minute that Harper is "evil", wouldn't vote for or support him if I did,(I know you were making a humorous comment).

Unfortunately, outside the political blogs, most Canadians trust the MSM, especially the CBC,and damned near all of them are Low Information Voters.

In June of 2008,I waxed apocalyptic on McCain/Palin's upcoming defeat in the November election, and was excoriated roundly for my pessimism.

I'll stay pessimistic,and work like hell to defeat the other side,rather than delude myself that voters will see the light and recognise what a good job Harper has done,etc.,etc.

don morris: "I'll stay pessimistic,and work like hell to defeat the other side,rather than delude myself that voters will see the light and recognise what a good job Harper has done,etc.,etc."

Good plan; still, the alternatives are much worse. Too bad about this one, and though dealt a bad hand, Harper is responsible. When he tries to first, reform the Senate, and then to after the trio, he is criticized. Oh well, it's lonely at the top. While it's best to keep one's guard up, I am optimistic - Mulcair and Trudeau are untried and unbloodied as party leaders in a national election. If they try the save the earth with carbon taxes, or worse fight with each other to claim that ground - they face sound defeat IMO. If they try some leftie-light version, they will be again pummelled by the pragmatic Harper.

The Senate scandal is not enough of a game changer, despite the mediocracy's claims. It will take more than that I think. I still say it rises nowhere near Adscam, where tax dollars were pilfered and funnelled into party coffers.

Yeah -- that's pretty good for them.

(It sounds a little like a small Jarndyce vs. Jarndyce.)

Leave a comment

Archives

November 2016

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

Recent Comments

  • Larry E: Yeah -- that's pretty good for them. (It sounds a read more
  • Shamrock: don morris: "I'll stay pessimistic,and work like hell to defeat read more
  • don morris: I agree with your description of Harper,but unfortunately a majority read more
  • Osumashi Kinyobe: The Liberals do this sort of thing so often that read more
  • batb: I tend to think like you. I figure that a read more
  • J.M. Heinrichs: 1. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/senate-votes-to-suspend-andrew-thompson-1.162353 2. http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ex-senator-raymond-lavigne-denied-early-parole-1.1401452 Cheers read more
  • biffjr.: "when the MSM will help a gullible electorate put Justin read more
  • ebt: Er, don, the "Harper was evil for appointing crooks" line read more
  • fhl: if the entitled senators had been allowed to continue bilking read more
  • don morris: The media didn't concoct a Conservative scandal,they took advantage of read more