Your Moral And Intellectual Superiors

| 48 Comments

Academic Sugata Mitra has suggested that spelling & grammar no longer needs to be taught to children.

Yet one less thing for teachers to be held accountable for. Their unions will undoubtedly be ecstatic!


48 Comments

Maybe we should just get rid of all the "teachers/academics"? That would make me ecstatic.

I havent had any formal trayning in spelling Or grammer, and it hasn't affected my employment prospects one bit.

Would u like fries with that?

“Firstly, my phone corrects my spelling..."

Then it is not "your" phone, Mr. Mitra. You are its (or it's? boy, it's (or its?) so confuseing) button-pusher.

"...one less thing for teachers to be held accountable for."

And in Ontario, it will give them more time to teach 8 year olds about the joys of perversions.

Wow, imagine the careers these kids will have? I mean, how many people exactly do they need to sell oranges by the freeway? Talk about setting your children up for a lifetime of struggles! FIRE THEM ALL!!!

Hilarious!

The greatest human advance that universal public education accomplished over the last 150 years was to dramatically increase the literacy of the ordinary person.

If tedious subjects like spelling and grammar ("readin' and writin'", as it were) are abandoned, the class literacy divide will re-emerge pretty quickly because you can be sure that private schools won't lower their academic standards.

Hail the new era of texting peons!

Sugata Mitra's an idiot.

Sadly, there are too many teachers today who can't spell and don't have the first clue about English grammar. They hardly need to be let off the hook.

Dumbing down is the new -- well, not so new -- order of the day. All the better for the ravening wolves to put one over on the low-information, low-education rabble, which will go along with anyone who offers them free stuff.

Literacy is key to intelligent decision-making. Without it, the underclass grows and is easier to hoodwink. I smell a conspiracy here.

"...one less thing for teachers to be held accountable for."

Hmm...

Why is it I get the impression - certainly here in Ontario - that teachers are already accountable for precious little as it is?

JJM


U can thank Billy Davis for the start to a slide into stupid in Morentario

Hey, no one has to comprehend text books, instruction manuals, warning signs or technical drawings anymore do they? Let's go back to the middle ages when only the elites were literate; things were so much better back then.

Sugata Mitra is proof that a university education does not confer wisdom.

You know,sitting back and thinking about it,I can tell you the square root of 1444(it's 38),without using a calculator.Yet my 23 year grandaughter,who is in her third year of "university",truly does not know the difference between "to","too",and "two".Where have we screwed up so badly?

What does shuuughata miestrah care about spelling

Or better question,why have we failed and screwed up our off-spring so badly?

Critical thought is not part of the discussion anymore. Removing literacy simply solidifies control. The ruling class can rest easy as their control is unthreatened.

This makes perfect sense, that whole let them have their ebonics in class experiment has up lifted a whole race out of their welfare ghettos.

But this is not news, when my daughter was going to public school in Ontario she got an A on her paper, it had incorrect spelling, improper punctation, no paragraphing, capitalization was haphazard. I went to her teacher and asked how she could possibly have an A for such an effort.

The teacher looked at me as if I was someone to be pitied and went on to explain that her job was to make sure that her students could use "CONCEPTS", that they were able to put their incredible IDEAS on paper. Spwelling and grammer were for people with no imagination or intellectual or abstract thinking. They were structures that limit the intellect.

No need to learn to add/subtract etc either, after all there are calculators in phones these days.

I'm sure it's coincidental that the preponderance of teachers come from the bottom quartile of college graduates. I propose we update the old slur to: Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach, teach.

Spwelling and grammer were for people with no imagination.

did you do that on purpose,
or did spell check miss it?

Spwelling and grammer

Spelling and grammar,

no pun intended, is that original Canadian spelling or distraught American screwed up English?

inquiring minds and all that..

Spwell Chegue? Wht the hell uses that anymore? I can spell and spend checks on my own,trank you. What's next? 1+1 = 3? Oh wait. That's how many "teachers" it takes to run a class of 20,even without reading or writing.

"...Sugata Mitra has suggested that spelling & grammar no longer needs to be taught to children..."

If the college papers that I used to correct are reliable indicators, I'd say that our teachers are at least twenty years ahead of Mitra on this.

spwelling and grammer ? Twas on purpose...... A small nod to being enlightened to the true meaning of an education. It even hurt a little to leave it thier. ( that was on porpoise two) sew was dat.

Nah, I thynk that whaevr we wanna sai n wryt shud b acceptbl to evyr1 an if they has a prlblm wif it, two bad. Sew wht if thei dont unnersnd us? Thnx perfessr.

Overt collectivist conditioning - now they want to make kids incapable of communicating effectively - because everyone knows the new utopian collective doesn't need a diversity of opinion or stray narratives - just obedient droids to serve the state and its agendas.

"We"? Which "we" are we thinking about, Just?

Brilliant comments, everyone!

I keep hearing that younger people these days are "so intelligent" and "much smarter than we were back then". Really? Why is it then that when you talk with most people under 25:

- They can't add or subtract two numbers in their head?
- They can't multiply most single digit numbers?
- They don't know the difference between "it's" and "its"?
- They don't know the difference between "your" and "you're"?
- They don't know anything about history?
- Their political views range somewhere between "Far Left" and "Radically off-the-scale Left"?

If this constitutes "much smarter" people then I have swampland in Florida to sell you!

P.S. They don't know even basic geography either, such as where Florida is on a map!!!

In Ontario, as far as I can see, the responsibilities of teachers are to teach sex. And, indeed, advanced techniques at that.

We already are in a situation where the elites are literate and the proles aren't.

I'd limit the criticism of teachers' unions. Teachers teach what the boards of education tell them to. Curricula tend to be set by floating (flying, actually) consultants (and guru Mitra may well be one) working with the relevant government agencies. In Canada those are provincial. I don't know whether they are state or municipal in the US.

I don't really have all that much use for Mike Harris in Ontario, because he kept worrying away at the teachers' unions without much effect, when he might have solved the worst problems with Ontario education with a short walk from his office to his Department of Education. I don't think he was a CINA, just a d****d fool.


I must admit that I don't really get too concerned about spelling and grammar (yes, I see some of my errors after I hit the submit button). Unfortunately, due to one really awful teacher in elementary school who the was allowed to stay with our class for 3 out of 4 primary years, I missed out on significant amounts of basic LA education and as well as many other subjects. Fortunately better teachers were brought in to teach us math and science for all of those years. Crappy teachers is one of the risks of unaccountable public education, I guess.

Anyway, one other unintended consequence of not teaching proper English Language Arts is that it might put the classics of literature out reach of those students. If you are not required to write properly and read/write/understand complex sentences then reading those classics might become too difficult.

Paraphrased from an article by Herbert Spencer:

Bear constantly in mind that the aim of your teaching and discipline should be to produce a self-governing being; not to produce a being subservient to others.

Link to the full article:
http://mises.us1.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=bf16b152ccc444bdbbcc229e4&id=e9920efe56&e=52761d3e72

Care to share any empirical evidence on your statement below.

Why is it then that when you talk with most people under 25:

- They can't add or subtract two numbers in their head?
- They can't multiply most single digit numbers?
- They don't know the difference between "it's" and "its"?
- They don't know the difference between "your" and "you're"?
- They don't know anything about history?
- Their political views range somewhere between "Far Left" and "Radically off-the-scale Left"?

Are there any studies or actually facts that back up this argument. Otherwise it is just an emotionally charged statement and is baseless.

I am 29 so I fall slightly out of the under 25 demographic, however you could have easily stated under 30 and still tried to pass it off as truth. All those statements are false when it comes to me and just doing a quick poll between my peers nearby in the 20-30 demographic all of them were false 100% of the time other than the last one about political views (subjective).

Please get off your soap box and stop talking down to the younger generations with unsubstantiated claims. I'm guessing you walked uphill both ways in a foot of snow in May back in your day as well.

Seems to me that writing skills, grammar and spelling are integral to how we respectfully interact with others - eschewing them pretty much guarantees negative social and economic stratification.

Every time somebody tells me how much smarter this generation is, I - at the earliest opportunity, if it's not immediately available - give them a notebook and a pencil, then tell them to do the math required to lift a rocket out of orbit and land it safely on the moon.

You know what the saddest part is? Probably 80-85% of them need to have it explained that no, in the 60's they didn't use computers to do the math for them.

I wish I could afford a fully stocked underground bunker.

As an aside, I sometimes conclude by telling them: "You're no smarter than the guy who invented the crossbow ~400 B.C., but he was probably better educated than you are."

Generally speaking, that doesn't go over well.

I gave a young person 2.50 at the cash register, after a mistaken 5.00 check had been written
for a total cash register bill of $7.40.

My change should have been .10, she gave me back two dollars,
I tried to explain what I was doing and we had to call the manager.

I finally had to write another check for $7.40 and gave the girl back her 2 dollars.

Its sad when people can't even cipher 10 cents..

My wife told me not to mention the time she gave a clerk 60.30 on a 45.30 bill.

They had to go find a calculator..

Indeed, my observations are based purely on the anecdotal evidence of my own experiences. But I guess you know better of my own experiences than I do. My mistake.

There are always exceptions to the rule. A friend's 3 year old son knows how to play chess. But in general, I stand by what I said and absolutely believe those statements to be true in the vast majority of younger people. One can make a very valid argument that "it's not their fault". The problem is that the bar has been set low, the level of expectations so miniscule, that most never had any reasonable opportunity to acquire knowledge that older generations consider "basic".

I have a friend who once bought some candy for 25 cents per 100 grams. He bought 500 grams and couldn't figure out how much he owed the store. I wish I were kidding!

Yeah well, I recall an old yarn about a highschool reunion.

The head of the class arrived along in a beatup vehicle and threadbare suit....he was a university professor.

The dropout showed up in a flash car, with a trophy wife and a new Saville Row suit....he owned several restaurants.

The restauranteur explained..."Ya buy a steak for a buck, cook it and sell it fer 10 bucks....ya all'as makes 10%"

An old story, profs these days drive BMWs.....

Right you are batb. The Aghenda two one ilk do not want educated people to confront them, they want to spin webs of deceit for little mental lambs to fall into; look at any gument document for proof of that spoof. Teachers have become well paid entertainers with submersive messages tainting every word, slide show and action.

You gave the answer to the "Why" question.

My spelling errors, in this comment, are intentional.

I concur with Jamie MacMaster (and the papers I'm still marking are no better).

Yes, there are many universities who admit the weakest undergraduates to their teacher education programs (as most universities treat teacher education as a mere cash cow), but it is not true of all of them. I can say from long experience, however, that the best of our graduates -- and there are many of them -- are much less likely to be hired in public schools than our weakest students (and the ever weaker students from some of our neighbours). The best of our graduates who actually got jobs in teaching are working in independent schools, where they earn less money and benefits, have less job security, more extracurricular activities, and most of them wouldn't even consider moving to the public system.

These students learned early on that an "education guru" was something to be avoided Unfortunately, our school boards and provincial departments of education can't get enough of them (at least until they get arrested for heinous child abuse).

"We"? Which "we" are we thinking about, Just?"

Heh. General use of the term "we".Look it up if it wasn't taught to you.(or is that two you?)

Well while we're nitpicking. What's up with people spelling ridiculous rediculous. Is that just a different but correct spelling?

I would argue that the "class literacy divide" already exists, and the divide is growing at a phenomenal pace. The reason is, the practice of Social Promotion in urban public schools. For example, I read recently that 80% of New York High School Graduates are... wait for it... "functionally illiterate".

So, even though the majority of the folks are sending their kids to school, and paying their taxes; if the kids are not being taught arithmetic, spelling, grammar, phonics, history, physics, chemistry and biology, they are not learning anything of value. In fact, they are having their educations stolen from them by complicit school teachers who are entitled to their entitlements, and salaries; that would rather collect a pay check than find an honest profession where they are being paid for offering a service of equal value.

IMO, public school unions in cahoots with socialist political parties have conspired over my lifetime to ensure generations of uneducated citizens in order to create massive voting blocks of "sheeple". Sheeple with NO critical thinking skills; thus, ensuring millions of unemployable citizens destined for poverty, hate, envy, and misconceptions of the world and the people around them; or, you can call them liberals.

There have been numerous articles/studies by professors and other experts discussed over the years at sda claiming that the majority of kids entering the University system are not functionally literate. The fact that you are oblivious to such articles/studies is on you! We've been having this discussion for years here; it's on you to catch-up.

These opinions about public education are easily quantifiable with a little bit of research; but, I'll throw you a bone: look into the scores of today’s students who challenged SAT tests from the 20s and 30s and see how they did; also, look into literacy rates for high school grads from New York State, just to name a couple.

The fact you used some "friends" anecdotally to form your opinion/comment without any real research actually makes the case that the 30 and under crowd have not received (typically) a first rate education.

"You are who we thought you were".

Fearless Leader - you've actually hit on the way to get back at these educational progressives. If everything is relative and there's no definitive right answer to any question, then these educator's paycheques should be whatever makes the author of the cheque feel good. I think it would make the author of the checks really good to leave off a digit each time. Or to change all 9's to the more a more elegant 2. If there is no right or wrong way to spell, or do math, then how could he complain? Especially if his phone has been hacked to agree.....

Thanks Rick. You have a way with words and I was hoping someone would say it the way you did.

The results of such academics being taken seriously are apparent to anyone who looks at the product of our education system.

Common sense would dictate that these clowns get laughed off the campus. Instead, they are quoted and elevated to the status of "persons of import".

I swear to God, I've seen a marking rubric for high school students that eschewed proper spelling, grammar and punctuation in lieu of "getting one's point across" (how that would have been achieved I am unsure). This is the benchmark for students poised to go into university.

Human beings have the ability for complex thought and language and now it has been reduced to grunting and LOLs.

We've failed as a species.

I would argue they do need to be let off the hook. As in, off the payroll. Fire their sorry asses if they're not capable of doing what they're supposed to be teaching, no matter what the old joke about "those who can, do, those who can't, teach" says.

And that applies to the idiots who are teaching fourth grade math that they don't understand themselves.

My children are educated at home precisely for this reason. While they might not have learned the finer points of the Ontario grooming I mean sex eduction curriculum, they most certainly have learned the important things like language math and reading.

When the world is run by the morons that are being produced by the education system of today, they will need their wits about them just to survive.

Leave a comment

Archives

November 2016

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

Recent Comments

  • Robert Jones: My children are educated at home precisely for this reason. read more
  • PD: I would argue they do need to be let off read more
  • Osumashi Kinyobe: I swear to God, I've seen a marking rubric for read more
  • OMMAG: The results of such academics being taken seriously are apparent read more
  • David in Michigan: Thanks Rick. You have a way with words and I read more
  • C_Miner: Fearless Leader - you've actually hit on the way to read more
  • indiana homez: There have been numerous articles/studies by professors and other experts read more
  • indiana homez: I would argue that the "class literacy divide" already exists, read more
  • rgraham4444: Well while we're nitpicking. What's up with people spelling ridiculous read more
  • Justthinkin: "We"? Which "we" are we thinking about, Just?" Heh. General read more