23 Replies to “Free Section 13!”

  1. Great start but as long as these kangaroo courts exist at all, we are still in the grip of this politically correct, professional busybody lunacy. I’ll celebrate when all these retards are applying to be Walmart greeters.

  2. Such a problem now; so many sacred cows to barbecue without having to worry about the HRC’s. The islamofascists must be outraged as they can no longer claim to be offended over someone publishing the truth about what they’re attempting to do.
    First target should be organizations who still assume that S13 is the law to stop their censoring of free speech. In my neck of the woods, attempting to connect to Mark Lemire’s freedomsite.com results in an interiorhealth message that “hate speech” web sites are forbidden to be accessed from interiorhealth computer systems. Never mind that freedomsite was key in making S13 declared unconstitutional. Have to consult with some of my colleagues before I start this attack as I have to find out to what degree I’m already seen as a loose cannon in this area.
    Another target now that S13 is history is Telus. Shaw internet never asked for me to rescind my right to free speech before using my cable internet connection. I believe in redundancy and so I wanted an ADSL connection as well. Telus would not let me connect before agreeing to a completely unacceptable set of terms including that I would not publish “hate speech” using their ADSL connection. I balked and was somewhat annoyed that I was paying for an ADSL connection I couldn’t use. Then I had the brilliant idea of creating an open WiFi access point using my ADSL connection. I had to wait a few weeks, but then, at some point during this time, someone who needed an open WiFi internet connection agreed to the Telus TOS. Once the connection was unlocked, I locked down my WiFi connection (I believe in open WiFi but given the limited bandwidth of local ADSL I don’t have much to share). I am thus able to publish anything I want through an ADSL connection because I never agreed to the TOS. Now that S13 is dead, time to rake Telus over the coals for their acquiescence to totalitarianism. One isn’t required to agree to what one says on a telephone when one moves to a new location and connects to the local telephone company and why Telus thinks it can get away with this for digital communications is bizarre.
    It’s open season on the easily offended now and the rules of the hunt are fairly straightforward; stick to the truth and don’t say anything which would expose you to the criminal code “hate speech” provisions. Let the islamofascists make the threats which would result in them facing criminal charges. S13 was based on a paradigm where criminalization of inconvenient truths was seen as the role of the legislation. Now it’s time to find out who can make the most islamofascist heads explode by just publishing simple facts.

  3. Congratulations Kate and SDAers! Yes, SDA was one of the very first websites to denounce S13 and SDAers and Kate never gave the topic a rest. Right you are Brian Lilly to have mentioned SDA as the top of the blogs deserving credit for getting this totalitarian slab of legislation sent to the incinerator where it has always belonged.
    Thanks Kate and SDAers – take a deep bow.

  4. Brian Lilley points out at 1.50 in the video that this bill repealing section 13 doesn’t come into affect for 1 year. “shhhhh”
    *Not that they’ve ever managed to rake anyone over the coals in less than a year!
    SDA @ 4.30 BCF, 5 Feet, Binks… 🙂

  5. Hi five Kate and a fist bump, you made Canadian history
    (with some help from your friends)
    Always happy to help,
    Dale Wright
    PS give a shout out to the anony- mice.
    PPS I had nothing to do with that, you can’t prove anything.
    Love and regards, Kate,
    dwright

  6. My question is this…
    Is Connie Wilkins (Fournier) Former “Free Dominion” blogger now free of charges brought by W -arman aaaaaaaaa couple of teaars ago?
    Serious question …….

  7. My question is this…
    So where does Connie Wilkins (Fournier) law suit with the serial hurt feelings lawyer stand?
    Serious question …….

  8. I come here daily but rarely comment. It’s a thing. I did however wish to thank you for fighting so hard on this issue. It’s improtance cannot be over estimated.

  9. Now nice of you to ask, BCL! If you’d like to contribute to the legal defence fund, there’s a paypal button on the side of the page.
    Those who cherish actual liberty have contributed enough and then some. It’s the “liberals” in name only – such as you – who coast through life relying on the work of others.

  10. Thanks, Kate, for all you do to promote Canadians’ freedom of speech rights and for your smackdown of bcl. He has a helluva nerve to ask, seeing as he and his side have made sure those bills keep mounting. ‘Douche bag.

  11. Until every Province is rid of this collectivist monkey on the backs of our Democracy. It will not be ended.
    This is a first step in a long political war on ridding us of these kangaroo courts.
    As long as they exist they are a slow poison in our veins

  12. You are absolutely correct. There is no place nor justification for these kangaroo tribunals and commissions in a free democracy. There were and are already laws to protect against libel or inciting violence. I do not even buy the excuse that they are necessary to prevent discrimination against renters or customers. A true free market would quickly sort that out, since unfounded discrimination is just bad business.

  13. i can rememeber writing my first (of many letters to many different memebers of parliament) of thanks to Dr. Keith Martin (a liberal no less – Esquimalt – if i remember correctly)for taking a stand on the issue when nobody (except sda and its readers) had any idea about what was going on at the HRC.
    my sincere thanks and best wishes for this canada day weekend – ms. kate –

  14. Betcha Hudak is gonna stand on his soapbox Tuesday a.m. and demand the scrapping of Ontario’s HRC….right? 😉

Navigation