O, Sweet Saint Of San Andreas

27 Replies to “O, Sweet Saint Of San Andreas”

1. The Muslims are right, death to the infidels!

2. California bankruptcy will be a mercy killing.

3. And just when I thought I’d seen it all!!!

4. I guess that Gov. Schwarzenegger wasn’t the only one of them to claim that “I’ll be baaaack”.

5. “Hi; my name’s Dick…”
   😉 DaninVan

6. 6 foot long penises for the taxpayer, no wonder we feel like we are getting screwed. !

7. My oath what next. On a lighter note imagine all the homo’s sweating like chickens drawing logs when they see that brute.

8. “The health department sparked some controversy when it debuted the three characters, all penises but in different hues, back in 2002”
   But were the three penises in different sizes too?

9. Well it’s probably a good idea because there are more diseased pr*cks in that state than any other! Literally AND figuratively! HAR HAR HAR!

10. “The health department sparked some controversy when it debuted the three characters, all penises but in different hues, back in 2002”
    But were the three penises in different sizes too?
    Come on, Cyclist! They would have *had* to have been, unless the state has taken “equality of outcomes” to a new and insane level.

11. Remembering a comment from one of the children actors in the movie E.T.
    I wonder if it is permissable to address the character performer, who might have an offensive breath as “penis breath”. Cheers;

12. When will they meet up with the pink vagina costumes?
    What then?

13. “Ah, I see your schwartz is as big as mine” – Darth Helmet
    Ironically, the Healthy Penis is circumcised. It’s “ironic” because it’s the same do-gooders that are trying to ban the procedure who’ve thought-up this silly Mascock.

14. I can see the filter is going to be a d1ck today, so I’ll rephrase my comment.
    “Ah, I see your schwartz is as big as mine” – Darth Helmet
    Ironically, the Healthy Penis is circumcised. It’s “ironic” because it’s the same do-gooders that are trying to ban the procedure who’ve thought-up this silly Mascocq.

15. I blame Bush! I can’t be mad at the working stiff in the costume.

16. What about the children? Someone could lose an eye!
    Hurry-up, get a restraining order on Sandra Fluke!

17. So now we know where Borat is currently working.

18. I think they should call him Skeeter. roglmao
    I declare myself the “WINNER” of this thread.

19. In ancient Times people would erect huge statues of the male organ. Than sacrifice children under them, while holding orgies.In Japan they hold a festival with Women carnying copies of said organ. Human nature never changes.I’m just surprised these are not at the top of abortuaries.Like steeples on Church s.
    Anyway Californians will be seeing a lot of these for real when urinaing hordes of bums, under their ‘Bill of rights for the “homeless” kick in.
    http://tinyurl.com/b7nqxcx

20. Well to be fair that is the head liberal think with.

21. You could juxtapose the San Francisco healthy penis with San Francisco declaring 2013 the “Year of the Child.” http://blog.sfgate.com/cityinsider/2013/04/21/s-f-names-2013-year-of-the-child-despite-having-so-few-of-them/

22. Could be worse. Could’ve been the Spotted Dick.
    What? It’s a pudding.

23. Roseberry – I think there was a little yellow one. BTW, steer clear of the green ones.

24. Christmas is coming soon enough. How can I get one of those penis shaped stress toys for my sister?

25. IMO a “healthy” penis will wilt if its owner attempts to penetrate a males anus with it. Also, if the morons who came up with this concept were attempting to prevent VD, they’d clothe the “healthy penis” in an appropriately sized condom (hopefully one which provided an airtight seal so that the lifespan of whatever snivel servant was inside would be drastically shortened resulting in one less statist we’d have to deal with in the future). But then, blatant hypocrisy isn’t unusual for moonbats as Indiana Homez noted that the organ is circumsicized – in a city which bans that particular HIV infection reducing procedure.
    Likely the net effect of this “educational” campaign in SF is similar to what I saw in Vancouver – heterosexuals terrified of having sex with a new partner lest they contract HIV. In Vancouver, during a particularly bad year, I might diagnose two heterosexual cases of chlamydia. Where I currently practice, a location where the queers have long since departed for friendlier turf, it’s not unusual for me to diagnose two cases of chlamydia during a 4 hour walkin shift. People here have a more 1970’s approach to sexuality and I haven’t diagnosed a single case of HIV in the 5 years I’ve been practicing here. So much for the politically correct medical dogma that heterosexuals are as likely to contract HIV as male homosexuals.
    When I asked a physician in one of the nearby small towns if he had any experience in treating HIV, his answer was “Hell no, all of the queers in town have had the shit kicked out of them enough times that the survivors have moved to Vancouver”. I suppose that statement might be construed as being somewhat politically correct, but it’s just one of the reasons why I moved to where I currently live. The only homosexuals I see in my practice are all lesbians who don’t seem to have any problem fitting in as they, for the most part, are in stable relationships.

26. Kate, you need to relax your spam filter to deal with topics such as this. My comment held up in the spam filter.

27. Free Willy!