The ongoing boycott of the biggest news story in the world by most mainstream media outlets screams out for the following poll question to be given to all American journalists:
If you had these two choices, which path would you take:
1. Pursue the Benghazi story doggedly, no matter where the leads take you. This will likely result in you winning the Pulitzer Prize. It may also result in helping to cause Barack Obama to lose the 2012 election.
2. Sit on the story and do nothing, ensuring that Barack Obama is not hurt by it.
What percentage of today's journalists would answer #1 and what percentage would answer #2?












I'd say that about 2% would answer #1, and the remaining 98% would answer #2. I'd also say that the Pulitzer people wouldn't give the prize to anybody who broke a story making a Democrat look bad.
I'm much more optimistic. 5%-#1, 95%-#2.
If it was the Canadian media,though,I'd agree with "Iowa Jim".
Oh, Robert. We all know the Pulitzer goes to the journalist who can spin #1 into a Bush-Romney debacle that boosts Obama and helps him win in 2012.
That, of course, is the problem. Ain't no way to spin it.
It's a sad commentary on the media when liberals have to go to Fox to hear the truth. Are the owners of CNN so committed to the liberal cause that they willingly give up big coin to suppress stories. There used to be a proud field called investigative journalism. How many more human interest stories about Girl Guides collecting dresses for down-and-out transvestites do we need?
The 'independent press' version would have the "Obama-Nation(tm) thinking he was playing a video game 'Medal of Honour'. He thought he could just push the 'REVIVE' button for a replay.
Unfortunately, the 'Obamessiah' is some distance removed from performing feats of resurrection; so he may have to sit this one out.
But just look at all the sheeple...hopefully not lead to the slaughter! It appears that the 'independent and free press' are the ones behaving like sheeple. Bah, bah...humbug.
The 'Pravda press' would have a hard time covering St. Nicolaas giving presents to children because it doesn't fit their world view. They would much rather sit among the cynical scoffers, than harm their 'Anointed'.
Yep, so deep in the tank and lacking oxygenation to the brain...
Cheers
Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief
1st Saint Nicolaas Army
Army Group “True North”
Neither. It would be a write in vote - What Benghazi story?
RGB beat me to it. "What Benghazi story?" would win by a landslide.
That question is best posed to journalism students. If we see less than 10% interested in pursuing a story that will wreak a corrupt governing cabal, you can bet on 2 things:
1) Journalism degrees do not certify journalists, just political activists
2) There will be a lot of journalism grads working at Wal-Mart when they implode their industry because of public backlash to political manipulation masquerading as journalism.
As Mark Steyn puts it...Benhoozi?...
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/331901/benhoozi-mark-steyn
Probably 5%/95%. The 95% know what Obama is, they've always known. To paraphrase the great Pogo: "We have seen the U.S.'s enemy and it is us." I nominate them all for next year's Walter Duranty Prize. http://pjmedia.com/blog/walter-duranty-prize/
Here's an unpleasant thought.
Consider the Jimmy Savile scandal currently engulfing the BBC. Jimmy Savile was a TV personality with a taste for young boys and girls apparently, it all came out with his death a couple weeks ago. (No doubt Jimmy is enjoying his Heavenly reward now.)
The scandal has boiled the BBC in oil, as it appears that -many- BBC types had a hand in, so to speak. The scandal has also reached out and got some on the new head of the New York Times, according to stories on Drudge.
Perhaps we are seeing the silence in the MSM as a result of wide ranging blackmail or a quid pro quo? It has always struck me that most of these Big Lefties talk like a pack of perverts when you joust with them on-line, so perhaps it isn't so far fetched.
Maybe some enterprising black-ops ninjas could take advantage of such a golden opportunity.
A Pulitzer you say? Well Maureen Dowd has one, and of course Walter Duranty... Puts me in mind of something.
Journalism has always been a liberal field, but this could be overpowered by ego - people wanted to get a story and succeed, or at least piss off important people. Nothing wrong with that. Now, however, they cheerfully sublimate themselves for the glory of this cause, and in particular, one worn out empty suit.
The sheep picture is entirely accurate.
Well, as I pointed out (but forgot to post or got deleted) the Pullitzer Prize is no benchmark of moral or intellectual integrity. Neither is the Dynamite Guy's prize.
Walter Durany won one for praising Stalin and down-playing the Ukrainian genocide. And it was not withdrawn, unlike say, Lance Armstrong's 7 prizes.
There's TOO MUCH GOVERNMENT in nearly all corners of our daily lives. All is politics now, and therefore all is sh1t and corruption.
As a journalist you're dead if you don't have access to the pols of both parties and the nomenklatura.
And this. (I'm still thinking "Pulitzer". Tom Friedman has three, FFS.)
And this. (I'm still thinking "Pulitzer". Tom Friedman has three, FFS.)
100% would answer #1.
95% would do carry out answer #2.
Where in the quiz did it say you have to be honest?
Obama has employed an Australian herder and they are buying votes for SEX.. An ugly sheep in every bed, or trade up to a Kenyen goat. Do you think these may be the promised Virgins?
Posted by: Slap Shot at October 29, 2012 3:31 PM
Wow!
Just shut up about Benghazi already and watch 24/7 coverage of the Frankenstorm!!!
I can't believe the yanks are just taking this laying down. A sad day indeed.
Thank God for that Caribbean gal named Sandy, huh? That will buy a few more days for the media to sit on its collective ass.
Expert Tom, I'd appreciate it if you didn't mention the "perfect storm",which is Stephen Harper's fault for not complying with the Kyoto Accord.
Scar@1:41 Apparently CNN is partially funded by US government. What does that tell you?
The press have largely had no qualms about being Obama's lapdogs, however disgraceful their current behaviour. However, it's not like there isn't news about Benghazi anywhere. If a voter won't research it, what does it say about him?
I'm clean disgusted with Obama and his press lackeys but I'm even more disgusted with the voters who still latch on to him four years after a disastrous administration, with or without the Benghazi incident.
I think the press would fall largely into the second category- ignore the story and keep Obama safe. Their egos have to be preserved. They might miss out on a prize but they are on record as saying Obama is the best for four years. Something's got to give.
So unfortunate, the citizens of the USA, are sleep walking through this election. Not many are political watchers, and so if not grabbed by the arm and told watch this, have no idea what's going on around them. Oh free condoms, Obamas's the man. I fear the poser is going to be re-elected. With the hurricane, any chance of Obama being outed is slim to none.
Frankly are the press in Canada much better? Particularly the so called "National" press on the Hill? 50 year old Women gushing like teenagers over (Shiny Pony) Justin Trudeau. Men acting like their in a Kibbles & Bits commercial. Excited the Liberal may be back with Ontario as head dog. They are fawning over him like the second coming of his Father. o bring what is right back to Canada , exorcising us of the evil Harper. Every main branch except one. I don't even want to talk about the Globe or Mails drooling over this air head.
That hes a communist like good old Dad & hates the West is good enough. Guess what. WE too have one news branch while the others shill for the Marxist NDP ot liberals. Just like America. The CBC is in adoration phase on our tax dollars.
Because they are Communists as well.
The only saving grace is we know them all to well, even their friends to trust them.
Kibbles N Bits 1988 Commercial
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvoBAeNhNZk
Check out Move On's latest ad..warning,NSFW,at http://t.co/ImRBU2bD
any chance that Obama could postpone the election, no juice for voting machines for example, and declare martial law?
Related...so it looks like Twitter is blocking the #Benghazi and #7hoursOfHell hashtags from showing up on Trending topics.
Related...so it looks like Twitter is blocking the #Benghazi and #7hoursOfHell hashtags from showing up on Trending topics.
Question. Who hands out the Pulitzer Prize?
Ahhh,now it makes sense! Just read at Newsbusters the Move On ad was produced by Mikey Moore!
Benghazi. The number one news story of all time, bar none. The fact that it is being ignored by media outlets goes to show it is A TOTAL CONSPIRACY.