Tony Blair's Britain

Thread title is a tad dated - It's Campbell's Britain now and the iron fist of the nanny state is as active as ever ushering in the new authoritarianism. Public policy and economic spiral remains the same and "Mohammed is still the #1 baby name in England".

Proving there isn't a pinch of difference between branded parties where running the statist socialist EU agenda is concerned.

Sorry that should read Cameron's Britain - got el Gordo on the brain for some reason this AM.

This should work out well. The Brits have always enjoyed authoritarian rule,and in another generation they're going to be living under a regime ever more strict than Queen Victoria.

As long as they DO NOT send any more of their communist labour agitators over here,I'm fine with that.

Occam, Kate has left it as Tony Blair's Britain because he, Brown and Labour caused all this disastrous socialism. In this case their government admitted to changing the demographics of Britain to reflect their lefty diversity goals.

"they're going to be living under a regime ever more strict than Queen Victoria."

Huh? I'd take middle-late Victorian Britain in SECONDS over any extant government today, the relative freedom, good sense and civilization were all dramatically better.

I'd miss modern medicine, but I can't think of anything else.

(Yeah they had problems but authoritarianism was not it, most of society was just left alone.)

Lot's of "rape, rape" coming their way.

Buy stock in chastity belts and black hair dye like the young girls in Sweden are forced to wear now.

The country, which was about 2% Muslim in 1990, grew to 4.6% Muslim in 2010, with nearly 2.9 million followers of the faith, according to analysis by the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.
By 2030, the United Kingdom will be just over 8% Muslim

Yawn. The Islamo-obsessives are getting desperate after Doug Sanders crunched them in his book.

I've read that the majority of Islamist terrorists attacks in Europe, have been committed by Muslims who studied at Universities in the U.K.

There gov't. institutions are enforcing some aspects of Sharia law now.

As anyone whose has had to deal with bullies or gangs will know, they don't need to be a majority to rule, all they need to be is the most aggressive.

In Canada, Toronto, as seen by the recent Al-Quds Islamist demonstration, is beginning to share in the U.K./Eurabia experience.

Ha ha LAS. First of all it's Doug Saunders not Sanders.

Is that the Doug Saunders whose book is currently ranked a whopping 110,288 on Amazon? He's the fellow that works for the Globe and Mail, a newspaper that regularly blends truth and fiction to serve its political agenda?

Ah yes, let's all take Doug Saunders seriously. Give me a break.

re. dave @12:05 - "In this case their government admitted to changing the demographics of Britain to reflect their lefty diversity goals."

New Labour set out to destroy Britain. I don't see how you could put it any nicer than that.

http://tinyurl.com/9rd8uyy

Hey LAS, here's a sample tweet from your Muslim-loving buddy Doug Sanders (sic):

"Doug Saunders ‏@DougSaunders

Thought on Neil Armstrong: He risked his life to show us that space is so boring that there's no good reason to send humans there."

Like I said, desperate.

You have to have children in order to name them.

Mohammed is the most popular name because people that like that name are having children. And these children are the future of Britain.

God Save the Queen!

LAS you have your head in the sand.

Oh and LAS, while you are drooling over Saunders, could you tell us how many people on amazon.com or amazon.ca have reviewed his book?

Last time I checked it was ZERO.

That's right LAS, ZERO.

#@: Finsbury

Shaidle worries about the Jew:Muslim ratio. I could care less, but it would be awfully difficult.

I'm much more concerned about the "people who know they have to work":"people who think the gubmint owes them a living" ratio, or the "people who mind their own business":"people who aren't satisfied until you only eat/drink/smoke/drive/watch/read what they think is acceptable" ratio, or the "people who exhibit common decency":"people who shoot off guns in crowded parties/malls/streets" ratio. Those all affect me way more than two groups who share a common holy book, won't eat a pork chop, and yet want to kill each other.

I had a very brief and polite exchange with Mr. Saunders a couple years ago.
He informed me that Turkey wasn't islamizing.
And that I should look for sources other than the "marginal" Caroline Glick.
Nice clueless chap, Doug.

Kate is absolutely right in retaining the Tony Blair's Britain thread title. Tony Blair, who thinks Islam is progressive and who allegedly reads a bedside Koran, destroyed the UK.

On Mohammed being the #1 baby boy's name, relax: Jonathan MacKay (sp?) sez it's no big deal. Chaps like Saunders and Mackay think there's no problem as long as the muslim pop doesn't get over 49.9999% and as long as we have the superior fire power, having no understanding whatsoever of civilizational jihad.

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/016364.html

This website article claims Muslims become more aggressive by the time they reach 10% of the population.

That's no surprise, a small number of ruthless and determined people can take over the government without too much trouble. Take lawyers f'r instance.

That'd be for bout the 10th year running .... eh?

Hardly NEWS at this point.

KevinB:

The phrase you're looking for is "couldn't care less."

And it is possible for some of us to worry about more than one thing at once, you know.

And the only reason some Jews may want to kill Muslims is because Muslims want to kill them first (and everyone else, including other Muslims.)

@ dmorris, "That's no surprise, a small number of ruthless and determined people can take over the government without too much trouble. Take lawyers f'r instance."

You can add Bolsheviks to your comment. There was only a few thousand of them, but they were determined, had no scruples and killed anyone in their way. Just like radical Islamists.

Look whats happening to Toronto. Its 5% by the way when public violence happens. Thats the gestalt number in any Nation that has invited in these Marxist political pseudo-Religious despots.

I like that SDA is dropping the pretense of opposing radical Islamic terrorism specifically, and instead is now openly admitting that it's actually been opposed the whole time to Muslims and Islam in general.

I like that SDA is dropping the pretense of opposing radical Islamic terrorism specifically, and instead is now openly admitting that it's actually been opposed the whole time to Muslims and Islam in general.

But Islamophobia is term made up by the Muslim Brotherhood! /psychobabble

Doug Saunders made it very clear: birth rates of second gen Muslims drop off a cliff like and so does their religiosity like all the other immigrants.

MND, as long as you want to believe in 'civilization jihad' and other conveniently impossible to verify/disprove theories spouted by pseudo-scholars like Glick, I can't stop you. Just don't expect the government to indulge your views with damaging limits on immigration.

Yeah Tony, as a matter of fact I am opposed to Muslims and Islam in general, and believe me, it even took some strength for me to capitalize the words. Where is this phantom army of moderates who would wrest power from the radicals and reclaim their 'religion of peace'? I don't see it happening. If in fact moderates are in the majority, it doesn't really matter, they're going to lose. Look around the Middle East and Africa. Europe. Asia. Who's winning? Moderates or radicals? This is serious shit, Tony. It ain't your grandpappy's Islam anymore.

Terry, and that was a ditto for moderates in Russia in the 1917-1920 period and in Germany in the early and mid 1930s.

Hoping for the best is not an option, at least not a survivable one.

Tony @ 10:54 - you can't have the first thing without the second.

I am opposed to Islam in general. What's not to oppose? I like some Muslims, but only the ones who aren't very Muslim; which is handy, because the ones who are very Muslim don't want anything to do with infidel whores like me.

They are colonizers. If I still cared about Britain, I would object to her being colonized.