The ongoing meme of the Democrat Party is that their political opponents are constantly waging a war on women. The inference is that Democrats, in contrast, are supportive of women.
It's therefore confusing to read this story:
Five women who worked for Vito J. Lopez, the assemblyman at the center of a broadening sexual harassment scandal, described in interviews an atmosphere of sexual pressure and crude language in his office, with frequent unwanted advances by him and others, requests for provocative dress, personal questions about their boyfriends and fears of reprisals if they complained.By their accounts, Mr. Lopez, 71, a Brooklyn Democrat, told some women not to wear bras to work. He requested they wear short skirts and high heels. He gave them cash to buy jewelry and complimented them on their figures, giving special attention to those he called “well endowed.”
"Mr. Lopez, ... told some women not to wear bras"
That's not supportive at all.
It is sort of a micro macro thing.
Marxist/Feminist women would have no second thoughts about electing
a charismatic leftist practicing rapist as their leader provided he slavishly
implemented their overall agenda and appointed them to positions of power.
His victims would just be the price of doing their political business.
.
"do as we say, not as we do." Mantra of the Democrats.
@sgt lejaune Example Teddy Kennedy elected senator nine times.
You're confused about leftie hypocrisy?
Bill Clinton was "supportive" of women and HE was a Democrat
Sounds like heaven to Bill Clinton.
He'll be right over.
I was thinking about our own federal NDP party when I was reading this. Massage parlours and abused women. CBC could make a movie out of this stuff.
Yeah,but the DemoncRats have an out.See,he is 71,so that was before PCness and women's lib was around,so he doesn't know any better.It's society's fault,ya know.
Ohhhhhhhh. My brain hurts after that pretzel folding brain exercise.
But Lopez supports abortion. The only things that matter to the Feminazis are the right to kill their babies and the power to compel "fair" wages based on their subjective wants. Once you realize this, Clinton/Layton et al make perfect sense.
And you have Debbie Wasserman Schultz calling the Republican women speakers "shiny objects". It turns my stomach to see the hatred directed to those who don't agree with their point of view. Debbie and her "Mini-Me" side kick Sandra Fluke (along with the majority of the Democratic party)are the ones waging the war.
Well let the Dems have their little "War on Women"; they already have Sgt. Debbie Shultz and Colonel Sandra Frat House Fluke-up.
It should provide quite the entertainment...I look forward to their explanation as to why they need abortuaries on every block and how that will move the economy 'forward' or is that "Vorwärts".
Cheers
Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief
1st Saint Nicolaas Army
Army Group “True North”
This story was buried on p. 21 of the A section of the Times. (National edition.) It was, literally, as far back as they could put it, since the next page is the editorial page.
more on the Democrats' and their followers' war on women:
http://twitchy.com/2012/08/31/american-idiot-2-jason-biggs-knocks-christians-targets-ann-romney-and-janna-ryan-with-vile-tweets/
This is the left. According to them, all women think and act the same. All women care about is abortion. All Democrat female interns deserve to be paid less than men and have sexual harassment coming to them.
That's the nature of the beast.
Well hey, at least they can balance the household food budget... by going down to the neighborhood abortion clinic.
Bad one I know.
Thinking outside the box..progressive style.
One wonders how many abortions Wasserman-Schultz has under her belt? Can't be none, that HATER...