And here I was, after a stressful 3 weeks on the road - my last night in a hotel room for a while - ready for a good night's sleep and Kate posts THIS. Well, thanks a lot Kate. Dinner is threatening to return, my eyes are bleeding and I've got the hee-bee jeebies. I'll try to think of the good old days when a vagina was something to behold...
Yes, there's a lot of ugly in the world, was there a good reason to post it here? I'm sure we all know that such people exist, without the graphic reminder.
Perhaps she's just dyslexic and spelled "Tulsa" backwards.
I'm sure that she looks desirable to a humpback whale or a walrus. She has the necessary cold weather insulation package installed and is ready to start attracting males in arctic waters.
I know the politics of this group are probably waaaaay out there in the left field bleachers, but do some here have to try and out-do the kids on the bus?
Those stupid kids on the bus just handed that fat lady over $400,000 dollars.
She needs to make a large check,
get back on that bus with half million dollars and tell all those stupid @ssHoles how much she appreciated the monies..
-
I need a phone camera and a school bus monitoring job.
I was also thinking that it's a sad comment about modern feminism that women think that they can gain "empowerment" by referring to themselves as sluts.
More than $450,000 has been donated to an online fund set up for a New York bus monitor who appears on a 10-minute video being berated and bullied by a group of middle school students.
And the Slut Movement, gray, that wants everyone else to pay for their birth control. If you don't pay much attention to the news, gray, you might want to Google "sandra fluke".
Line below a picture in the article (scroll down if you dare):
"These are probably the 72 virgins that terrorists get when they blow themselves to Kingdom Come."
I am astonished that you all have failed to grasp the obvious. The chair next to her is empty. Obviously, she is temporarily holding the sign owned by the participant on her right, who has simply excused herself briefly for a comfort break. Or a quickie. Occam's Razor.
The brothel she works in must be off planet - I'm sure she would appeal to extra-terrestrial miners who have been on a 1 year shift away from their home planet. Nanoo Nanoo baby!
I love the comment: And speaking of vaginas, I have a question that I’ve often pondered over the years – Just how does a guy explain to his mom that he’s decided to become a gynecologist?
I agree with gord. You watched it, you cant unwatch it! Or was that Futurama?
Did you hear about Madona going in for a Vagina reduction operation. Afterwards, a guy from the burn unit sent her flowers and thanked her for his new ears.
Most of the comments in this thread are as intellectually and morally vapid as what you can read on lefty blogs. Why the ad homien attacks? If this woman has silly arguments, then expose the ridiculousness of her arguments. Comments made about her weight should be offensive to everyone. Maybe look for a school bus monitor to pick on next time.
"Did you hear about Madona going in for a Vagina reduction operation. Afterwards, a guy from the burn unit sent her flowers and thanked her for his new ears."
dan S - exactly. It's the issue, the 'argument' that should be debated and rejected.
Instead, most of the comments on this thread have denigrated, shamefully, to personal ad hominem bullying and mocking of her appearance which has nothing to do with the argument. How is mocking someone's appearance justified? Are only the beautiful allowed to present stupid arguments?
Such personal attacks are typical of the left; and now we see that the 'right' isn't immune to such behaviour. Hmm.
The argument is, in itself, fallacious. It is claiming a number of things - and are these claims valid?
First, that the GOP, which rejects the state paying for abortions, thereby has a 'war on women' and is trying to 'bully, subjugate and silence women'.
Is this argument against the GOP valid - that the state should pay for abortions on demand or is it a political tactic of the Democrats to gain women's votes?
Note that this tactic has moved the argument from a debate on the validity of abortion on demand to one that accepts it as an absolute 'human right' and moves on only to demand that it be funded by the state, ie, by other taxpayers. Shouldn't both these assumptions be debated rather than accepted?
Second, there is the assumption that
IF you are a woman, THEN, you are amoral. [This is actually an Islamic argument.]
The left is claiming that the GOP view women as amoral because of this insistence on demand abortions. Is this a valid claim, or is it the insistence that the state pay for these abortions that is the issue?
Shouldn't we debate these issues? Isn't the Democratic assertion that any rejection of the claim that the state must pay - is also a rejection of women's 'rights' - isn't this a stupid argument? And can only beautiful people present stupid arguments?
Leftists/liberals have thrown every possible shred of credibility- including a respectable appearance- out the window. Is it shallow to attack someone for their looks? Perhaps. Is it insane to leave the house looking like Jabba the Hut, scribble a crude sign and defend the indefensible? Very much so.
Why this blog? Until this moment
I have been forced
to listen while media
and politicians alike
have told me
"what Canadians think".
In all that time they
never once asked.
This is just the voice
of an ordinary Canadian
yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
homepage email Kate (goes to a private
mailserver in Europe)
I can't answer or use every
tip, but all are
appreciated!
"I got so much traffic afteryour post my web host asked meto buy a larger traffic allowance."Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you
send someone traffic,
you send someone TRAFFIC.
My hosting provider thought
I was being DDoSed. -
Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generatedone-fifth of the trafficI normally get from a linkfrom Small Dead Animals."Kathy Shaidle
"Thank you for your link. A wave ofyour Canadian readers came to my blog! Really impressive."Juan Giner -
INNOVATION International Media Consulting Group
I got links from the Weekly Standard,Hot Air and Instapundit yesterday - but SDA was running at least equal to those in visitors clicking through to my blog.Jeff Dobbs
"You may be anasty right winger,but you're not nastyall the time!"Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collectingyour welfare livelihood."Michael E. Zilkowsky
Well...I'm sure she votes.
Maybe "Slut" was a typo of "Hut" as in "Jabba the"?
And here I was, after a stressful 3 weeks on the road - my last night in a hotel room for a while - ready for a good night's sleep and Kate posts THIS. Well, thanks a lot Kate. Dinner is threatening to return, my eyes are bleeding and I've got the hee-bee jeebies. I'll try to think of the good old days when a vagina was something to behold...
I hear she went to the gynocologist one day and he exclaimed, "My you have a large vagina! My you have a large vagina!"
She replied, "I'm aware of that, but you didn't have to say it twice!"
"I didn't" replied the Doc. "Twas echo."
She disguises the word "Vagina" with obscure letters – LOL
Someone should eat her, she is far more valuable on the hoof than in a FEMA trailer.
Eye bleach, i need eye bleach... that was just wrong Kate.
She's beautiful.
Is this from Plenty Of Fish?
What has been seen cannot be unseen.
It's spelled ANGINA, woman, and if you lose about 200 pounds it doesn't have to lead to myocardial infarction.
It's here inner beauty that...
I'm sorry I can't...
It's her inner beauty that...
I'm sorry I can't...
Oz - her ANGINA alone weighs over 200 pounds.
"And I vote" should be considered a national threat!
Where is the CHRC when you need/pay for them? Oh yea, she’s on the commission.
andycanuck nails it. Lol!
if its an inner beauty she had better grab her a$$ cheeks and drag herself inside out
I know I live a sheltered life, but what is this all about? Or is this something I want to know? Did I burn my training bra (some years ago) for this?
Yes, there's a lot of ugly in the world, was there a good reason to post it here? I'm sure we all know that such people exist, without the graphic reminder.
Perhaps she's just dyslexic and spelled "Tulsa" backwards.
I'm sure that she looks desirable to a humpback whale or a walrus. She has the necessary cold weather insulation package installed and is ready to start attracting males in arctic waters.
I think she's serious.
http://grefillinn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/fitulosfyrir.jpg
But awwwww, look she's doing great... lost a few pounds. Good for her!
hahaha Fat jokes. I haven't laffed so much since grade 6
All this because some wingnut politicians sanctioned a peer who used the term" vagina' in discussion / debate.
And here I thought it was Madonna,s tour manager inspecting the cue cards for that evening's concert.
I know the politics of this group are probably waaaaay out there in the left field bleachers, but do some here have to try and out-do the kids on the bus?
out-do the kids on the bus?
Posted by: pkuster at June 22, 2012 6:02 AM
-
This clown should be so lucky-
Those stupid kids on the bus just handed that fat lady over $400,000 dollars.
She needs to make a large check,
get back on that bus with half million dollars and tell all those stupid @ssHoles how much she appreciated the monies..
-
I need a phone camera and a school bus monitoring job.
Thank you pkuster. I was thinking the same thing.
I was also thinking that it's a sad comment about modern feminism that women think that they can gain "empowerment" by referring to themselves as sluts.
More than $450,000 has been donated to an online fund set up for a New York bus monitor who appears on a 10-minute video being berated and bullied by a group of middle school students.
-
Great payback from a bunch of stupid twits.
LO
Sorry Kate .....
Slightly off topic.... but.....
Many years ago I had a buddy told me he preferred his large bodied girl friends' vagina, because it was no bigger then a mouse's ear!
I am just saying!
That woman has not SEEN her vagina for a decade!
And the Slut Movement, gray, that wants everyone else to pay for their birth control. If you don't pay much attention to the news, gray, you might want to Google "sandra fluke".
Sluts with vaginas vote. Hmmmmm tell me again why we gave women the vote.
Okay lady I believe you, for gods please don't show me.
She looks vaguely familiar which is a bit disquieting.
Hopefully she was glimpsed at some time in the past on Breitbart.
.
Line below a picture in the article (scroll down if you dare):
"These are probably the 72 virgins that terrorists get when they blow themselves to Kingdom Come."
Priceless
I am astonished that you all have failed to grasp the obvious. The chair next to her is empty. Obviously, she is temporarily holding the sign owned by the participant on her right, who has simply excused herself briefly for a comfort break. Or a quickie. Occam's Razor.
The brothel she works in must be off planet - I'm sure she would appeal to extra-terrestrial miners who have been on a 1 year shift away from their home planet. Nanoo Nanoo baby!
I love the comment: And speaking of vaginas, I have a question that I’ve often pondered over the years – Just how does a guy explain to his mom that he’s decided to become a gynecologist?
I agree with gord. You watched it, you cant unwatch it! Or was that Futurama?
Did you hear about Madona going in for a Vagina reduction operation. Afterwards, a guy from the burn unit sent her flowers and thanked her for his new ears.
link broken?
Fearless Leader @ 7::41
So am I to assume you have the same visual appeal as the bus monitor lady?
The only way she can see her vagina is with a mirror.
,
Most of the comments in this thread are as intellectually and morally vapid as what you can read on lefty blogs. Why the ad homien attacks? If this woman has silly arguments, then expose the ridiculousness of her arguments. Comments made about her weight should be offensive to everyone. Maybe look for a school bus monitor to pick on next time.
I am a slut
And I vote
With a vagina
Fearless Leader @ 7::41
you have the same visual appeal as the bus monitor lady?
Posted by: Pkuster at June 22, 2012 11:15 AM
-
Ha.
Not really,
You would have seen a video of me beating the shit out of about 6 of them.
-
But I should have been humble,
cried,
and taken a vacation with $600,000 dollars
Madona going in for a Vagina reduction operation. Afterwards,
a guy from the burn unit sent her flowers and thanked her for his new ears.
-
Hilarious..
If this woman has silly arguments, then expose the ridiculousness of her arguments.
Leftist comedy writes itself...
Um. No thanks.
"Did you hear about Madona going in for a Vagina reduction operation. Afterwards, a guy from the burn unit sent her flowers and thanked her for his new ears."
Posted by: Syd B. at June 22, 2012 10:22 AM
I hope they weren't hydrangeas.
(Vogue is still the best music video ever made; Madge, however, is clearly a monster.)
dan S - exactly. It's the issue, the 'argument' that should be debated and rejected.
Instead, most of the comments on this thread have denigrated, shamefully, to personal ad hominem bullying and mocking of her appearance which has nothing to do with the argument. How is mocking someone's appearance justified? Are only the beautiful allowed to present stupid arguments?
Such personal attacks are typical of the left; and now we see that the 'right' isn't immune to such behaviour. Hmm.
The argument is, in itself, fallacious. It is claiming a number of things - and are these claims valid?
First, that the GOP, which rejects the state paying for abortions, thereby has a 'war on women' and is trying to 'bully, subjugate and silence women'.
Is this argument against the GOP valid - that the state should pay for abortions on demand or is it a political tactic of the Democrats to gain women's votes?
Note that this tactic has moved the argument from a debate on the validity of abortion on demand to one that accepts it as an absolute 'human right' and moves on only to demand that it be funded by the state, ie, by other taxpayers. Shouldn't both these assumptions be debated rather than accepted?
Second, there is the assumption that
IF you are a woman, THEN, you are amoral. [This is actually an Islamic argument.]
The left is claiming that the GOP view women as amoral because of this insistence on demand abortions. Is this a valid claim, or is it the insistence that the state pay for these abortions that is the issue?
Shouldn't we debate these issues? Isn't the Democratic assertion that any rejection of the claim that the state must pay - is also a rejection of women's 'rights' - isn't this a stupid argument? And can only beautiful people present stupid arguments?
ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!
I cannot unsee this.
Damn!
Leftists/liberals have thrown every possible shred of credibility- including a respectable appearance- out the window. Is it shallow to attack someone for their looks? Perhaps. Is it insane to leave the house looking like Jabba the Hut, scribble a crude sign and defend the indefensible? Very much so.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I need some eyedrops.