Now is the time at SDA when we juxtapose!

| 28 Comments

Super Smart Left Wing Academic - Right-wingers are less intelligent than left wingers, says study

Super Duper Smart Left Wing Academic - "Once all the writing competition submissions have been graded, these scores, as well as the law school transcripts of all those who have chosen to release the, are submitted to a Selection Committee made up of the President ad two other Review editors who have been elected by their fellow editors."

h/t FFoF


28 Comments

If we ever want to get to a point where race really does not matter then we all have to start calling affirmative action what it really is. A racist policy that has no place in a free country.

Wisdom will overcome intelligence any day of the week. Especially professors who have no clue beyond the world of words and theory.

Combine "leagaleze" with bad grammar and we see a pre-teleprompter Bambam trying to baffle with bullsh*t instead of dazzling with brilliance. No wonder the Whorehouse(honest, that's what my spel-chek gave as an alternative to Whitehouse) homies want to bury the details of his academic past.

No doubt they'll explain that they were writing that out on their phone and therefore it doesn't count.

Why are the "academics" at Brock University not charged with hate crimes?

If the target of their hatred had been other identifiable groups, rather than conservatives, there would be outrage and severe penalties.


Notice how the two photographs represent Obama and Mitt Romney,not hard to see a deliberate attempt to make Romney look like a fool.However in the real world one of them is a billionare business man and the other couldn t manage a chip wagon,any guesses on which is which.This article must have been written by that left wing genius Justin Turdeau.

And another thing,

Apparently your correspondent offended sensibilities of the blog administration, I apologise.
Here is another try.

Let us look closely at the picture of Romney, let us analyze it.

The Canadian "academics" said that "right wingers", rather than conservatives are less intelligent, maybe that is the catch.

In the picture, you have a conservative running for president being, appropriately heh, glitter bombed by enlightened, you might say left winged homosexuals.

Could it be that they are prejudiced against Romney. Could it be that they are "right wingers"?

What a pile of excrement.

Yes,I defer to my Left-wing friends who have done such a marvelous job in education,environmentalism,politics.

Because of their intelligence and dedication to the truth, we live in world with almost NO problems. I am humbled to be in the presence of such greatness.

While most on the Right are stand-ins for that banjo picker in "Deliverance".

So the butt pirates showered Romney with glitter because they are smarter than him? That explains everything.

If one is going to point out grammar and spelling mistakes, one should be careful to avoid them in their own writing as well.

Last paragraph by the writer "but at lease he never felt stigmatized-" should read "but at least he never felt stigmatized-"

Otherwise, a very interesting insight to the smartest president ever!

The Brock university study is obviously nonsense. I'll bet it was funded by a research grant! It's easy to select two variables, in this case, a test of intelligence and a survey of political ideology, and try to correlate them as causal.

The old axiom of 'correlation does not equal causation' seems to have been ignored. But furthermore, by making such a correlation, they are moving into a hypothesis, as others have noted, that declares that the left political ideology of socialism is superior to the right political ideology of capitalism.

Now, that requires more proof than a false link between intelligence and political support.

okay, I bite. What language is the 'super duper' leftist written in? Certainly not Sanskrit...

There's a lot of value in people thinking you're stupid. It makes it much easier to make other people look like fools, and you can rub it in by saying "I thought I was the dumb one"

Noel, given the correction of the affirmative action to reverse racism policies I will cut the author some slack and assume that this is an ironic comment written in Ebonics. "Do ya understand what I be sayin? - aww yea foo."

Actually frequently I have posed as unlettered/unsophistocated when encountering individuals who project a superior body language.

Such types are bullys for lack of a better lable. Invariably the take the bait, expose themselves as the immoral, shallow thinkers they actually are.

OBOZO projected that image before he announced he had visited 57 states and had 5 more to go, that he didn't speak "Austrian", couldn't differentiate between Las Malvinas and the Maldives.

Zero is a fitting knickname for buckwheat.

Would that it were. The current "education" systems would then self-correct and would churn out large numbers of right wingers. Unfortunately it churns out large numbers of semi-literate, innumerate lefties.

The assumptions the Brock academics make are so funny. Study Question: 'I wouldn't mind if a family of a different race moved next door.' I want to know the ethnic composition of the neighborhoods these profs live in. Question: 'Schools should teach children to obey authority.' Well, are we talking about table manners and not swearing at the teacher, or are we talking about actually engaging with ideas? But, as we all understand, lefties aren't authoritarian the way conservatives are. I've always noticed that about them.

Naturally, it's the conservatives who are racists. Does this bear out your actual experience of human people? It doesn't mine. And of course, intelligent left-wingers are "open minded". Really open minded. Very very open minded. Just like these profs, who aren't labouring under any bigoted assumptions.

This is just a slightly (very slightly) more sophisticated version of the open minded lefty habit of screaming racist!!! at the first sign of dissent. Do you know what I think makes people "feel safe"? Not "right-wing views" (which "provide.. a sense of order"). I think the idea of a vast, mothering, omnipresent government makes certain people feel safe. Sure, the thought creeps me out, and it creeps you out, but a lot of people seem to find it awfully soothing. This has got less to do with intelligence than it does with personality type; it's why women vote lefty in such tragically high numbers. You'd have to be a sociologist pretty divorced from reality (but I repeat) to deny that men are more adventurous than women. Men are also more right wing. I can't prove my personality theory, though, so I guess I need to conduct a b.s. study. Funding, I need funding.

Mutt: These smart pills you sold me taste like sh*t.

Jeff: See, you are smarter already.

@Noel, thanks for spotting that. I will correct it.

Irony is sooooo ironic sometimes.

Laura.

Where any political bent sits on the IQ bell curve is a matter foor debate, what is not really debatable is the matter of poitical ideology related to mental heath. Lib-left types overwhelmingly represent the full spectrum of neurosis and schitzophrenic behaviours.

The following is what passes as rational thought if you call yourself a “liberal/progressive”:

Drug addiction is a disease that should be treated with compassion and understanding. We need to offer injection sites and free dope to drug addicts in a non judgemental atmosphere - unless the addict is a Conservative talk show host.

Canada should be subservient to the United Nations. Our highest authority is not the equitable rule of law and the Canadian Constitution, but a collective of tinpot dictators, their communist and fascist appeasers and the U.N. earth charter thy use to disguise the spread of global totalitarianism.

“It Takes a Village” means everything you want it to mean - except creeping socialist government involvement in destroying the sanctity of the traditional family.

Disarming innocent, law-abiding citizens, militarizing the police with machine guns and pseudo martial powers helps protect them from evil, lawless terrorists and other thugs.

The Geneva treaty outlawing hollow-point ammo in war is a move you applaud and rigidly demand our troops comply with. However when a domestic security agency purchases 450 million rounds of maximum tissue trauma hollow point ammo for domestic use against civilians you applaud the move as a public safety enhancement.

The best way to support our troops is to criticize their every move. This will let them know they’re thought of often and their homeland media loves them.

Sex education should be required so that teens can make rational informed choices about deviant sex lifestyles, but gun education should be banned because it will turn those same teens into maniacal mass-murderers.

Minorities are blameless for racial hatreds; feminits are blameless for the misandry of anti-male rhetoric; but Zionist occupied Canada is entirely at fault for the hatred of Islamofascists towards the west.

State-run single tier medicine is the ideal. Never mind the millions of Canadians and Europeans who spend every dime they have to get to the United States so they can get the quality medical care that their nation’s socialized health care can’t provide.

John Lott’s 20 year research on how gun ownership reduces crime is junk science, but computer generated climate models of the sky on fire and flooded coasts due to yuppies driving SUVs and eating burgers is not.

Government should limit itself to the powers set out in the Constitution, which apparently includes banning self defense, property rights, freedom of speech and instituting inequality before the law based on race, and shopping the courts for activist judges sympathetic to left wing causes that wouldn’t pass in any legislature.

Social justice is some whacky lefty cause being recognized by the courts, tyranny is the courts showing reason and dismissing calls to try Harper for war crimes.

You support a woman’s “right to choose” to kill her unborn child, but believe that same woman is not competent enough to homeschool the children she bears or protect them by owning a defensive firearm.

All cultures must be treated as equal. This is why we have to make excuses for Muslims, natives and sundry other section 15(2) groups when they riot, rape and honor-kill - but we must vilify Christians when they organize letter writing campaigns.

Canada can only be great if it raises taxes, punishes finanial success, rewards free loading, creates bloated government, runs deficits and goes in debt for more entitlement programs. It worked so well for the Soviet Union, Greece, Spain and Portugal.

Being against open door immigration is racist. But race based policing and justice systems aren’t.

Everyone has the right to dissent, but only with a conservative government.

The only biased media is the North Korean media, but only because they hate our conservative government even more than the CBC.

Junk scienceclaims must be unquestioningly accepted because a “consensus” support the theory. Nevermind that there was also once “scientific consensus" that the Earth was flat, the Sun revolved around the Earth, and that the Piltdown mummy was real.

Under the picture of Barack and Mitt;
" Democrats voted in first black U.S. president Barack Obama."


Or maybe,' Democrats voted in the first black U.S. president , Barack Obama.

Or maybe even, " Democrats,in a transparent attempt to prove that they were not racist, failed miserably, by voting for the first black president,Barack Obama,because of the colour of his skin..

I may be a right wing moron, but i know the difference between correlation and causation

So, does this mean that conservative thinking people are the new untermensch?

Yes we all seen the genius of Martin & Dion.

I always have a chuckle whenever I read articles like this. It's obviously done so that leftists/liberals feel as superior as they can to anyone who is not them. After all, a scientist quantified it. However, the second this "study" comes under scrutiny, this "study" and others like it disappear.

If social and fiscal conservatives are such anti-social morons, why is it that they have more intact relationships/families and can hold down a real job much better than their liberal counterparts? If there were no government jobs for these liberal "betters", would they still find work? Is conservatism a universal term?

Why answer these questions when smugness based on erroneous assumptions says it all?

As other have pointed out the correlation = causation fallacy, I won't go there.

We have a very easy means of testing the researchers conclusions by looking south. Mean black IQ = 85, mean white IQ = 100. Thus, it should be self-evident that US blacks should be overwhelmingly "right wing" and racist. 95% of US blacks voted for Obozo. They are, however, very racist.

Back to the drawing board, or as is the case in academia today, time to get another grant to study anomalous findings generated by previous research.

The survey is selecting for authoritarian personality traits which have minimal correlation with political views. From my experience, the more "progressive" people claim to be, the more authoritarian they are.

Many conservatives were liberal lefties when young. See, some liberals are so smart they become conservatives.

Posted by: Occam at May 1, 2012 2:01 PM

Excellent post. Your summary, as ludicrous as it appears, is depressingly accurate. THIS is the mentality with whom the Right must attempt to reason.

mhb23re

Leave a comment

Archives