Um... hunh? That graph makes Obama look good and conservatives/Republicans look really really bad. It feeds their argument. Why are you posting it and helping them?
Spending isn't going down under Obama from the Bush years as this shows. And it doesn't even factor in inflation.
You have a point, but it is a reactionary one. The FY 2009 budget was supposed to be a temporary budget, it just happened to coincide with Obama coming into power. Never mind the fact that Obama has wanted to spend more, a lot more!
Compared to the increase in FY09 spending, the wars are actually quite small. My point was that FY09 was supposed to be temporary spending, wasn't that what all the keynesian economists were talking about?
It's amazing that the left still supports Obama even though he's doing nothing different than what Bush did during his two terms. No doubt the Republicans will do the same when Romney is elected this fall--not that I'm hoping he wins, you understand.
Half Canadian at May 25, 2012 5:42 PM
"I've been saying for a while that Democrats don't believe in math. I didn't realize that they'd also given up on arithmetic."
It's not so much that as they seldom tell the truth and then they have to lie their way out of it.
Why this blog? Until this moment
I have been forced
to listen while media
and politicians alike
have told me
"what Canadians think".
In all that time they
never once asked.
This is just the voice
of an ordinary Canadian
yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
homepage email Kate (goes to a private
mailserver in Europe)
I can't answer or use every
tip, but all are
appreciated!
"I got so much traffic afteryour post my web host asked meto buy a larger traffic allowance."Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you
send someone traffic,
you send someone TRAFFIC.
My hosting provider thought
I was being DDoSed. -
Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generatedone-fifth of the trafficI normally get from a linkfrom Small Dead Animals."Kathy Shaidle
"Thank you for your link. A wave ofyour Canadian readers came to my blog! Really impressive."Juan Giner -
INNOVATION International Media Consulting Group
I got links from the Weekly Standard,Hot Air and Instapundit yesterday - but SDA was running at least equal to those in visitors clicking through to my blog.Jeff Dobbs
"You may be anasty right winger,but you're not nastyall the time!"Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collectingyour welfare livelihood."Michael E. Zilkowsky
Um... hunh? That graph makes Obama look good and conservatives/Republicans look really really bad. It feeds their argument. Why are you posting it and helping them?
Spending isn't going down under Obama from the Bush years as this shows. And it doesn't even factor in inflation.
What a dumb unhelpful graph.
I meant: "Spending isn't going UP under Obama from the Bush years as we know but this doesn't show. And it doesn't even factor in inflation.
You have a point, but it is a reactionary one. The FY 2009 budget was supposed to be a temporary budget, it just happened to coincide with Obama coming into power. Never mind the fact that Obama has wanted to spend more, a lot more!
I've been saying for a while that Democrats don't believe in math. I didn't realize that they'd also given up on arithmetic.
Allan:
If you believe Bush's record breaking spending warpath was just a one-time thing, I've got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.
After Reagan and before the recession, Bush was responsible for the biggest spending increases in US history.
Or you could actually read the link, hunh?
Hunh?:
Compared to the increase in FY09 spending, the wars are actually quite small. My point was that FY09 was supposed to be temporary spending, wasn't that what all the keynesian economists were talking about?
I did not like the Bush deficit spending spree, and I dont like the three-fold increased deficit spend under 0blabla.
It's amazing that the left still supports Obama even though he's doing nothing different than what Bush did during his two terms. No doubt the Republicans will do the same when Romney is elected this fall--not that I'm hoping he wins, you understand.
Half Canadian at May 25, 2012 5:42 PM
"I've been saying for a while that Democrats don't believe in math. I didn't realize that they'd also given up on arithmetic."
It's not so much that as they seldom tell the truth and then they have to lie their way out of it.
Lies peppered with misinformation ,is now the new TRUTH.
Here is a good explanation of the MarketWatch article. The lefty is lying, as usual:
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/05/barack-obama-fiscal-conservative.php
Just another example of how everything about the Democratic Party's re-election campaign is just plain dishonest. No party can lie like the Dems!