Frankly, My Dear

| 27 Comments

h/t : Canadian Friend


27 Comments

A stimulating skewering of leftardian phraseology in the Breitbartian mode

Not sure whether that was a CBC documentary or from a Humanities class from either York or McGill U.

Anybody out there able to clarify for me?

Brilliant!

I always knew we were lied to about North American history!

Finally the truth comes out. It's about time, whites have been repressed here for far too long.

We can laugh, but the pathetic thing is, most of the leftards will either not see the searing wit, or decide its... wait for it.... racist...

Lord Nelson? A route over the top of Scotland , Grenedeirs Guards march , and gets worse after the first 15 seconds

It's a little light on historical accuracy.

glacierman,

it is definitely NOT a CBC documentary,

it is not about Indians nor Europeans either.

It is about showing where the left is wrong by simply using the left's own arguments - WORD FOR WORD.

it is done BRILLIANTLY!

Simply ignore the first 4 minutes and then listen to what arguments the white europeans use against the Indians.

and then you will see the "light"!

EVERYBODY should watch it, including leftists.

ps; Thanks Kate!

The lesson: learn from history.

The North American Indian people should have fought and killed all the sailors on those boats as soon as they found out that they planned to stay. The NA Indian people let the strangers off the boats and allowed them to get back on the boats and sail back to Europe. The Europeans came back with more people and disease - the disease wiped out the NA population and allowed the Europeans to get a foothold; it was downhill all the way from there for the NA Indian people.

The chief says "This is our land, it belongs to my people". The chief should have defended the land by killing the sailors or forcing them to stay and live like/with the Indian people.

Later, the American people fought a revolution to make the USA an independent country (independent from Europe) with a Constitution that declared all citizens endowed with inalienable Rights with a government subservient to the all powerful citizen. The European rot soon set in with the importation of thousands of Africa people who were sold as property. People who had been slaves to a King in Europe were willing to sell their new found liberty for prosperity at the expense of another mans/womans freedom.

Slavery is the worst evil that can ever befall any nation; the glaring contradiction in the United States undermined the fine nation that had been created.

Slavery in a nation with a magnificent Constitution that declared all people endowed by the Creator with certain Rights, forced the people to compromise the very Liberty they had fought for, right from the beginning.

If the USA had outlawed the slave trade and slavery when the American people declared themselves a nation, if, if , if....

Excellent video.

This is exactly what is happening today in Canada,the immigrants are arriving in droves accusing anyone that opposes them of racism and xenophobia.They have their allies in the Human Rights industry who assist them in their demands for positions of influence and power.They have zero intention of integrating into Canadian society,their goal is to BE the new Canadian society.We would not recognize the Islamic Republic of Canada of 2112 if we were still around.

This is exactly what is happening today in Canada,the immigrants are arriving in droves accusing anyone that opposes them of racism and xenophobia.They have their allies in the Human Rights industry who assist them in their demands for positions of influence and power.They have zero intention of integrating into Canadian society,their goal is to BE the new Canadian society.We would not recognize the Islamic Republic of Canada of 2112 if we were still around.

This is exactly what is happening today in Canada,the immigrants are arriving in droves accusing anyone that opposes them of racism and xenophobia.They have their allies in the Human Rights industry who assist them in their demands for positions of influence and power.They have zero intention of integrating into Canadian society,their goal is to BE the new Canadian society.We would not recognize the Islamic Republic of Canada of 2112 if we were still around.

Mass foreign ethnic and cultural Immigration destroys indigenous societies, it always has and it always will.

From Ancient Egypt, Classical Greece, the Roman Empire, the British Empire, on to modern Europe and North America, always the same with minor variations.

Canada and the US are NATIONS, not simply land masses. The people that built the nations are the indigenous people of the nation that their ethnic cultures built. Mass third world immigration is a form of ethnic, cultural, and social genocide, nothing less.

The world powers are educated people and they know this full well. This is social engineering, designed to destroy and rebuild to suit their ideological fantasies, their desire is to create ultimate and infinite power for themselves. Everyone else who is on board with their manipulations are simply the useful idiots.

Hey CF!

Lost you on the sarc/!!!!

Sorry bout dat.

shit don't play in germany

Jema54 .

"The North American Indian people should have fought and killed all the sailors on those boats as soon as...." - Jema54

They tried, and they failed. I'm always reminded of Cpt. James Cook in Hawaii, but natives fought white explorers everywhere they thought they had a tribal claim under threat. - K99

"If the USA had outlawed the slave trade and slavery when the American people declared themselves a nation if, if , if.... " - Jema54

We look at slavery today in the western world through a different lens than the third world, and some of the European colonists. In truth after the civil war many in the “anti slavery movement” viewed the introduction of blacks not unlike the Australians viewed the introduction of destructive European plant and animal species to the Australian ecosystem from a societal/ cultural standpoint. Abraham Lincoln was one of them, and in many ways they were right. You only need to see the history of cultural destruction along with endless racial violence to know it as fact. – K99

It is brilliant satire - putting leftist ideas and screed into the mouths of white conquerors.

That said, it is almost completely devoid of fact.

One thing, which Jema54 and others might note, is that Aborigines did not have the same views of land holding that we do. It was more a matter of rights of usage.

And of course the Aborigines were anything but a homogeneous lot. There are over 600 bands in Canada today,
and a lot of suspicion and mistrust exists among them even today.

And here is a question for the whites-are-evil school: why are there Indians living on the Canadian plains?
It's a hard place to make a living. Could it perhaps have something to do with the Iroquois tribes further east?

I shall attempt to defend what I wrote:

Knight 99 - this video shows the British arriving in North America first. We all know that the Spanish arrived in the New World first and that the Spanish took over South America and Mexico. Anyone visiting the cities of the Mayans, Incas or Aztecs will recognize the sophistication and power of these Civilizations. The people of north and south America were defeated, not by guns and superior power but by disease: deposited in the poop of Spanish sailors. I do not for a moment believe that the Spanish could have conquered such powerful people without a powerful ally, that ally in this case was death via disease.

The diseases had already spread to North America by the time that the British and French arrived - they were confronting a decimated, weak population, IMO. I was interpreting the video as it was presented.

John Lewis - I do agree, Native North Americans had different mores from Europeans (more like Ghengis Khan). I was interpreting the video as it was presented; I believe that my 'read' was the intent of the mind behind the video.

Knight 99 - the 3rd world (which would include Europe and Canada, at the time; Britain outlawed Slavery in 1820, did/does have a different view of slavery) yes, that is true! But the rest of the world did not write a magnificent Constitution insuring freedom for all people by via an articulation of God given (not state given) Rights that could not be challenged by any member of an elected government. The magnificence of this Republic had never been seen before and it has not been seen since! The fatal flaw: Slavery. Lincoln used slavery and the Constitution re: definition of a man/woman
as a 'reason' to fight a Civil war. Lincoln did not plan to abolish slavery when he got elected, he did it two years into the war, and then he only liberated Confederate slaves. Later extended to include the Union states.

No, it was the rot from Europe that perpetuated the war that destroyed the liberty enshrined in the original Constitution. Europe was 'worried'; USA was 'influencing' the peons in Europe, the serfs there wanted some rights. The msm of the day made the Civil War into a moral war about slavery/Constitution/religion - it was really about money and power. The Civil War brought USA to it's knees, just as the Europeans wanted, and destroyed state's rights and individual citizen's rights.

The club of righteousness could have never been used to justify the slaughter had slavery been outlawed with the victory over England, IMO.

Silly observations:

- the sailor/soldier helmets aren't English, but Spanish.

- ironic depiction of an Indian laying in the sun on the beach doing nothing.

I only got that far into and stopped...

Jema54 >

"I shall attempt to defend what I wrote:"

No need, my comments were not critical of yours in any way. Simply an added point of view, nothing more.

That video is getting around 10,000 views a day on youtube.

it was at 20,000 friday and is now at over 50,000.

And judging by the numerous comments at youtube, a lot of people are getting fed up of the liberal war/witch-hunt on white people.

I wonder why it only got about 18 comments here at SDA?

The irony here is incredible. Whatever the video intended, it hilariously demonstrates the nonviability and idiocy of nativist anti-immigration arguments. If that Indian (an attenuated red Sherriff Arpaio) had gotten his way, North America would still be ruled over by primitives. Thank goodness immigration proceeded apace. Too bad about the smallpox and other diseases.

Mass foreign ethnic and cultural Immigration destroys indigenous societies

Only the ones that are backwards and primitive. Immigration has NEVER been bad for good countries like America and Canada.

LAS >

“Only the ones that are backwards and primitive”

Yes, the point that was made.

“Immigration has NEVER been bad for good countries like America and Canada.” – LAS

Until recently, as we import more of the “backwards and primitive” cultures you mention the good is changing rapidly. As the US & Canada export their manufacturing base to become service industry societies, we continue to import Third World labor and problems, many of whom come for the handouts not opportunities. Unless for criminal opportunities like the Jamaican/ Vietnamese/ Indi drug trade of course.

well seems to have been uploaded by a white supremacist. so while its true i feel like a victim of blunt-force trauma after watching it, i'm not so sure its a good idea to offer this up as typical left-tard crap. more accurate to say it's a seriously unfunny and mind-numbing parody of a lefty position.

subversible >

"well seems to have been uploaded by a white supremacist."

White supremacist, or white nationalist? Is there a difference?

Would the guy who made the video be more inclined to build a Nazi socialist style concentration camp or lobby for a “White History month” to feel that he is treated equally in his society with other races that are allowed such racial pride recognitions?


we continue to import Third World labor and problems

What problems? EVIDENCE.

many of whom come for the handouts not opportunities.

Lies. US immigrants utilize the welfare state at a lower rate than 'natives'.

LAS >

"US immigrants utilize the welfare state at a lower rate than 'natives'."

Lies - Proof?

Leave a comment

Archives