Nearly every conservative and or thinking person will agree with that clip, but in order to reach agreement on the proposals in it ... we may have to fight a civil or class war where thousands if not millions will die.
Nice eh?
You cannot win a debate with a dedicated leftist zombie who has bought Al's religion, you must simply remove enough of his blood so he no longer can stagger around destroying our wonderful way of life.
If debate and logic were possible in dealing with Gore zombies, we would have already arrived at a reasonable conclusion and there would be a lot more employment and prosperity than here currently is in the Western world at this moment.
The solution as marxists elites see it is to allocate the good life to themselves,
keep on enough servants and workers for their comfort, kill those billions who disagree,
and turn the world outside their centres of brilliance back to nature.
Don't waste time with warmists - they're not in the business of having their minds changed.
It's those who don't have the time to follow the debate that we must direct our efforts to. They get their info from mainstream media, without fully understanding how slanted it is. Otherwise known as "the electorate".
Your point is right on ... although, it's fun sticking the 'bad' news and contradictions to the global warming faithful and watching them cringe and suffer ... that is just my desire for warped entertainment. I don't take it seriously ... but they do and I enjoy their pain.
We will win this in the end if only because it is the reality.
As the economic situation, exacerbated by Obamassiah's deft handling of the US economy, spirals out of control, fewer and fewer people have the time to worry about the AGW scam.
People only worry about greenie religious dogma when they a job and hope for the future.
Who woulda thought Obama and his Hopey/Changey mantra would be the death knell for Kyoto/AGW fear mongering.
To demonstrate how hopeless the 'dyed in the wool' climate alarmists are - how an acquaintance of mine conducted himself over the last few years (an otherwise very sane person).
> He sends me global warming religion stuff.
# I counter point by point with a few links.
> No direct response but later sends more Gore talking points.
# I snow him under with a dozen or so scientifically backed facts with links.
> No direct response just ad hominem attacks.
# I ask him to please send me the underlying scientific facts that support his position.
> He says I scare him.
# I ask why.
> He says he will respond but in four months has not.
Conclusion #1; He will vote 'climate alarmist' until the day he dies - no matter what.
Conclusion #2; You cannot have a rational discussion with an irrational person. Only a two by four over the head will work.
I disagree that this video would be ineffective. Leftist/greens tend to like cute cartoon/infographic presentations (they're very trendy these days.) It's a much easier sell than, say, pointing someone at a Glen Beck video.
I think skeptics could gain a lot more traction spreading the word if they present things in a style that appeals to the hipster/creative class. They'll feel as if its one of their own communicating the message as opposed to "the enemy."
Good video, agree with all of it except the implication that the third world must have their standard of living raised to that of the West.
I'm no pinko, but if everyone on the planet wants to have the same standard of living as us, then we will indeed destroy the planet. There are simply not enough resources to go around, nor enough land to give everyone 3000+ sq. foot home on 0.5 acres of land. Ain't gonna happen.
Viewing energy as some sort of socialist tool to level out disparity in standard of living between the West and the third world is a dumb idea.
Viewing energy as some sort of socialist tool to level out disparity in standard of living between the West and the third world is a dumb idea.
~TJ
The wealth redistribution scheme to raise the standard of living in the 3rd World is just a diversionary tactic to mollify western Leftists when their own standard of drops.
The redistribution isn't actually going to go to the poor in these nations, it's going to go to the elites(western and in the 3rd world) and the poor will remain in the straits they are living in.
Welfare doesn’t work to raise standards of living, it freezes the status quo and prevents grass roots wealth creation.
If you moved the entire population of the planet into the USA and gave everyone an even chunk it works out to .34 acres per person, or 3 people per acre, leaving the rest of the planet empty.
The statement "There are simply not enough resources to go around, nor enough land" is just so much BS.
Now, if you are talking about you and I paying for others, well, that's a totally different subject.
FREE, if you want to live like a socialist rat in a tiny cage, being fed soybean scraps because you have to share *finite* resources with 6.7 billion people, then go ahead.
As for me, I prefer to have access to a greater share of those *finite* resources than others, through hard work, intelligence, better governance, etc.
Oz, don't forget that part of the underlying purpose is to bring the standard of living in the west down to the level of the third world peoples.They keep giving us clues here and there about the reduction or elimination of the things that separate us from the third world people. The video makes mention of this.
I like to eat swordfish. At current fishing rates, swordfish will be nearly gone within 10-20 years max. If the swordfish supply was not finite, this problem would not exist.
As for land, it is clearly finite, unless you are like FREE who wants to live like a rat in a tiny cage. Then I suppose you could argue that the available land on the planet is infinite.
One of the things that allows the global warming and green cults to continue is that the average person does not appreciate what an exceptionally compact form of energy fossil fuels are. People get in their cars but don't really have an appreciation for how much energy it takes to move an automobile from A to B. This disconnect from reality means that the Al Gore's of the world can tout wind/solar/etc. as alternatives knowing that the average person will be fooled.
Oz, don't forget that part of the underlying purpose is to bring the standard of living in the west down to the level of the third world peoples.
~Ken (Kulak)
Very true Ken.
My point was that the elites pushing the idea of wealth redistribution through the AGW scam were justifying the drop in standard of living that the Leftist foot soldiers were going to experience with the sop that their sacrifice would be worth while because living standards would thereby be raised in the 3rd world.
Of course that motive is false and the result is we will all end up with lower standards of living, especially the people in the 3rd world as food prices rise along with energy prices and the use of corn grains for ethanol production lead to famine.
Excellent video, thank-you very much for posting it Kate. I plan to send a link to this video to all my friends and family - some will appreciate it, the gonzos for the GM hoax might watch it by mistake and delete it with vigor...but I will have planted that seed of doubt...even lame brain msm inspired AGW cultists hate to spend their own money. This video informs the people of North America that they will be going down with the greenie group think, they will take down those that they resent and envy but they will all be going down the drain into the same cesspool under civilization and the comforts of civilization. Information is important for changing hearts and minds for the good, IMO.
I dunno, I like the days back when we used horse and buggies, ladies weared those big bloomers, and we used candles and whale oil street lamps to light our world.
Why this blog? Until this moment
I have been forced
to listen while media
and politicians alike
have told me
"what Canadians think".
In all that time they
never once asked.
This is just the voice
of an ordinary Canadian
yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
homepage email Kate (goes to a private
mailserver in Europe)
I can't answer or use every
tip, but all are
appreciated!
"I got so much traffic afteryour post my web host asked meto buy a larger traffic allowance."Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you
send someone traffic,
you send someone TRAFFIC.
My hosting provider thought
I was being DDoSed. -
Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generatedone-fifth of the trafficI normally get from a linkfrom Small Dead Animals."Kathy Shaidle
"Thank you for your link. A wave ofyour Canadian readers came to my blog! Really impressive."Juan Giner -
INNOVATION International Media Consulting Group
I got links from the Weekly Standard,Hot Air and Instapundit yesterday - but SDA was running at least equal to those in visitors clicking through to my blog.Jeff Dobbs
"You may be anasty right winger,but you're not nastyall the time!"Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collectingyour welfare livelihood."Michael E. Zilkowsky
Nearly every conservative and or thinking person will agree with that clip, but in order to reach agreement on the proposals in it ... we may have to fight a civil or class war where thousands if not millions will die.
Nice eh?
You cannot win a debate with a dedicated leftist zombie who has bought Al's religion, you must simply remove enough of his blood so he no longer can stagger around destroying our wonderful way of life.
If debate and logic were possible in dealing with Gore zombies, we would have already arrived at a reasonable conclusion and there would be a lot more employment and prosperity than here currently is in the Western world at this moment.
The solution as marxists elites see it is to allocate the good life to themselves,
keep on enough servants and workers for their comfort, kill those billions who disagree,
and turn the world outside their centres of brilliance back to nature.
Don't waste time with warmists - they're not in the business of having their minds changed.
It's those who don't have the time to follow the debate that we must direct our efforts to. They get their info from mainstream media, without fully understanding how slanted it is. Otherwise known as "the electorate".
Kate nails it !!
Kate,
Your point is right on ... although, it's fun sticking the 'bad' news and contradictions to the global warming faithful and watching them cringe and suffer ... that is just my desire for warped entertainment. I don't take it seriously ... but they do and I enjoy their pain.
We will win this in the end if only because it is the reality.
As the economic situation, exacerbated by Obamassiah's deft handling of the US economy, spirals out of control, fewer and fewer people have the time to worry about the AGW scam.
People only worry about greenie religious dogma when they a job and hope for the future.
Who woulda thought Obama and his Hopey/Changey mantra would be the death knell for Kyoto/AGW fear mongering.
To demonstrate how hopeless the 'dyed in the wool' climate alarmists are - how an acquaintance of mine conducted himself over the last few years (an otherwise very sane person).
> He sends me global warming religion stuff.
# I counter point by point with a few links.
> No direct response but later sends more Gore talking points.
# I snow him under with a dozen or so scientifically backed facts with links.
> No direct response just ad hominem attacks.
# I ask him to please send me the underlying scientific facts that support his position.
> He says I scare him.
# I ask why.
> He says he will respond but in four months has not.
Conclusion #1; He will vote 'climate alarmist' until the day he dies - no matter what.
Conclusion #2; You cannot have a rational discussion with an irrational person. Only a two by four over the head will work.
Way too simple for the left to grasp.
Maybe there is a conclusion #3.
He has "invested" everything he has(had!) in global warming religion and would(will) loose his shirt if(when) it all collapses. Could it be?
I disagree that this video would be ineffective. Leftist/greens tend to like cute cartoon/infographic presentations (they're very trendy these days.) It's a much easier sell than, say, pointing someone at a Glen Beck video.
I think skeptics could gain a lot more traction spreading the word if they present things in a style that appeals to the hipster/creative class. They'll feel as if its one of their own communicating the message as opposed to "the enemy."
Good video, agree with all of it except the implication that the third world must have their standard of living raised to that of the West.
I'm no pinko, but if everyone on the planet wants to have the same standard of living as us, then we will indeed destroy the planet. There are simply not enough resources to go around, nor enough land to give everyone 3000+ sq. foot home on 0.5 acres of land. Ain't gonna happen.
Viewing energy as some sort of socialist tool to level out disparity in standard of living between the West and the third world is a dumb idea.
Viewing energy as some sort of socialist tool to level out disparity in standard of living between the West and the third world is a dumb idea.
~TJ
The wealth redistribution scheme to raise the standard of living in the 3rd World is just a diversionary tactic to mollify western Leftists when their own standard of drops.
The redistribution isn't actually going to go to the poor in these nations, it's going to go to the elites(western and in the 3rd world) and the poor will remain in the straits they are living in.
Welfare doesn’t work to raise standards of living, it freezes the status quo and prevents grass roots wealth creation.
Hey TJ
The world population is about 6,755,000,000.
The land area of the USA is 2,300,000,000 acres.
If you moved the entire population of the planet into the USA and gave everyone an even chunk it works out to .34 acres per person, or 3 people per acre, leaving the rest of the planet empty.
The statement "There are simply not enough resources to go around, nor enough land" is just so much BS.
Now, if you are talking about you and I paying for others, well, that's a totally different subject.
Oz, fair point.
FREE, if you want to live like a socialist rat in a tiny cage, being fed soybean scraps because you have to share *finite* resources with 6.7 billion people, then go ahead.
As for me, I prefer to have access to a greater share of those *finite* resources than others, through hard work, intelligence, better governance, etc.
TJ when did I say that?
All I did was call you on false rhetoric.
Using BS to support FREEDOM isn't what a good upstanding conservative does, that is saved for the NDP to use.
As to the finite resources argument, prove it.
Oz, don't forget that part of the underlying purpose is to bring the standard of living in the west down to the level of the third world peoples.They keep giving us clues here and there about the reduction or elimination of the things that separate us from the third world people. The video makes mention of this.
Ron in Kelowna
" He says I scare him."
Good enough ... that is progress in itself. At the very least you have given him a sore stomach. That counts for something.
The irony is that when you present him with reasons 'not to be afraid' of the fictitious climate change, he gets scared. .... of what???
"As to the finite resources argument, prove it."
I like to eat swordfish. At current fishing rates, swordfish will be nearly gone within 10-20 years max. If the swordfish supply was not finite, this problem would not exist.
As for land, it is clearly finite, unless you are like FREE who wants to live like a rat in a tiny cage. Then I suppose you could argue that the available land on the planet is infinite.
One of the things that allows the global warming and green cults to continue is that the average person does not appreciate what an exceptionally compact form of energy fossil fuels are. People get in their cars but don't really have an appreciation for how much energy it takes to move an automobile from A to B. This disconnect from reality means that the Al Gore's of the world can tout wind/solar/etc. as alternatives knowing that the average person will be fooled.
Oz, don't forget that part of the underlying purpose is to bring the standard of living in the west down to the level of the third world peoples.
~Ken (Kulak)
Very true Ken.
My point was that the elites pushing the idea of wealth redistribution through the AGW scam were justifying the drop in standard of living that the Leftist foot soldiers were going to experience with the sop that their sacrifice would be worth while because living standards would thereby be raised in the 3rd world.
Of course that motive is false and the result is we will all end up with lower standards of living, especially the people in the 3rd world as food prices rise along with energy prices and the use of corn grains for ethanol production lead to famine.
Pointing out the fact that there is lots of room left doesn't justify your lame attack.
Your rhetoric should be left in the liberano play book, where it belongs.
Excellent video, thank-you very much for posting it Kate. I plan to send a link to this video to all my friends and family - some will appreciate it, the gonzos for the GM hoax might watch it by mistake and delete it with vigor...but I will have planted that seed of doubt...even lame brain msm inspired AGW cultists hate to spend their own money. This video informs the people of North America that they will be going down with the greenie group think, they will take down those that they resent and envy but they will all be going down the drain into the same cesspool under civilization and the comforts of civilization. Information is important for changing hearts and minds for the good, IMO.
Excellent video. I'll pass it on.
// YNoKyoto: In A Nutshell //
So finally Anthony "missed by a million" Watts has found a format suitable to his content.
I dunno, I like the days back when we used horse and buggies, ladies weared those big bloomers, and we used candles and whale oil street lamps to light our world.
Oh wait, nix the street lamp idea.