After all has been said and done, why won't our Federal Government eliminate section 13 of the CHRA?
The last Conservative Party national Convention voted to eliminate this fraud against Canadians.
The speaker who introduced this motion at that convention received a standing ovation. How much proof of malfeasance is needed?
What will it take to get Prime Minister Harper's attention to this issue?
She seems to forget she works for we the people not the other way around, any information they gather and collect on we the people should be quickly and freely given to us. Shame on Harper for allowing an arm of the government, without police powers and rules to govern them, gather information on Canadians merely because that ditch doesn't like our political beliefs.
PMSH is listening - it's the Troika who protect the likes of Lynch, Jennifer. There is a majority of Troika in the house of commons - thus a majority of votes is Troika - can't pass legislation without a majority!
Melwide: a vote on this right now would fail. The political optics are terrible as very few people in Canada know what is happening and thus they would see the oppo parties accusing the CPC of attacking human rights. as someone once said - in the arena of public relations, when you have to explain your position you have already lost.
Much of BCF's piece is tongue-in-cheek, so I assume he's kidding when he says that Jennifer Lynch is instructing her staff to not read BCF. In the first two pages of the scribd doc the body of the text is entirely redacted, as is the identity of the sender and the recipient of the email.
This remaining bit, under the heading "Re: Stand alone computer & access to web sites", says:
"As to the action to be taken, what a bout (sic) an e-mail reminding people not to do so. I believe we sent one in the past???"
There's no way of knowing what "the action to be taken" is. Whoever sent the e-mail could very well be referring to - for example - a reminder to monitor BCF from non-traceable computers rather than the on-site computers.
It's absolutely appalling that the CHRC is spending any time monitoring BCF.
And what the hell is this:
"The following was posted on the National Post's website this afternoon.
"Jonathan Kay: 'Do you like visible minorities? You do? Well, then: You're a racist.'
Posted September 22, 2009, 1:30 PM by Jonathan Kay
"Jerry Seinfeld: 'Hello? Who is this? Donna Chang? Oh, I'm sorry, I must have dialed the wrong number.'
Elaine:'Donna Chang?'
Jerry: 'Should have talked to her. I love Chinese women.'
Elaine: 'Isn't that a little racist?'
Jerry: 'If I like their race, how can that be racist?'
- Seinfeld Episode #90, The Chinese Woman, Oct. 13 1994."
What's next? Is the ever-probing CHRC going to ask BCF and the National Post to cough?
There really should be a full parliamentary hearing about the goings-on of the CHRC. Canadians have a right to know what websites the CHRC is "monitoring", and the justification for it in each case. Let's see the un-redacted e-mails and other documents.
Why this blog? Until this moment
I have been forced
to listen while media
and politicians alike
have told me
"what Canadians think".
In all that time they
never once asked.
This is just the voice
of an ordinary Canadian
yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
homepage email Kate (goes to a private
mailserver in Europe)
I can't answer or use every
tip, but all are
appreciated!
"I got so much traffic afteryour post my web host asked meto buy a larger traffic allowance."Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you
send someone traffic,
you send someone TRAFFIC.
My hosting provider thought
I was being DDoSed. -
Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generatedone-fifth of the trafficI normally get from a linkfrom Small Dead Animals."Kathy Shaidle
"Thank you for your link. A wave ofyour Canadian readers came to my blog! Really impressive."Juan Giner -
INNOVATION International Media Consulting Group
I got links from the Weekly Standard,Hot Air and Instapundit yesterday - but SDA was running at least equal to those in visitors clicking through to my blog.Jeff Dobbs
"You may be anasty right winger,but you're not nastyall the time!"Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collectingyour welfare livelihood."Michael E. Zilkowsky
Kate, did you mean to say Lynch Jennifer?!
What? Did she win the Olympic Gold in mindless oppression?
This will be appealled we suspect something very rotten in Jenny's Tin Pot Tyranny.
After all has been said and done, why won't our Federal Government eliminate section 13 of the CHRA?
The last Conservative Party national Convention voted to eliminate this fraud against Canadians.
The speaker who introduced this motion at that convention received a standing ovation. How much proof of malfeasance is needed?
What will it take to get Prime Minister Harper's attention to this issue?
melwide: "What will it take to get Prime Minister Harper's attention to this issue?"
A parliamentary majority.
I sure hope lynch gets 20 or more years for her role in doing the Nazi thing to us Canadians.
She seems to have learned a lot from Reich Minister of Propaganda Goebbels.
I refer to her as Obersturmbannführer Lynch given the neo-Nazi baiting by former underling Warman.
You can haf all ze free speech you vunt; provided it ist 'approved speech'...
It's so delightful to know that one's tax dollars are used to trot out this rubbish.
It's not "free speech" when there is a penalty attached. This is an internal contradiction in terms.
The entirety of the CHRC more resembles a black farce...
Cheers
Hans-Christian Georg Rupprecht, Commander in Chief
1st Saint Nicolaas Army
Army Group “True North"
Blazingcatfur, good for you, hang in there and keep it up until someone cleans up that nest. Are you listening PMSH?
She seems to forget she works for we the people not the other way around, any information they gather and collect on we the people should be quickly and freely given to us. Shame on Harper for allowing an arm of the government, without police powers and rules to govern them, gather information on Canadians merely because that ditch doesn't like our political beliefs.
This woman is the limit!
PMSH is listening - it's the Troika who protect the likes of Lynch, Jennifer. There is a majority of Troika in the house of commons - thus a majority of votes is Troika - can't pass legislation without a majority!
Melwide: a vote on this right now would fail. The political optics are terrible as very few people in Canada know what is happening and thus they would see the oppo parties accusing the CPC of attacking human rights. as someone once said - in the arena of public relations, when you have to explain your position you have already lost.
Much of BCF's piece is tongue-in-cheek, so I assume he's kidding when he says that Jennifer Lynch is instructing her staff to not read BCF. In the first two pages of the scribd doc the body of the text is entirely redacted, as is the identity of the sender and the recipient of the email.
This remaining bit, under the heading "Re: Stand alone computer & access to web sites", says:
"As to the action to be taken, what a bout (sic) an e-mail reminding people not to do so. I believe we sent one in the past???"
There's no way of knowing what "the action to be taken" is. Whoever sent the e-mail could very well be referring to - for example - a reminder to monitor BCF from non-traceable computers rather than the on-site computers.
It's absolutely appalling that the CHRC is spending any time monitoring BCF.
And what the hell is this:
"The following was posted on the National Post's website this afternoon.
"Jonathan Kay: 'Do you like visible minorities? You do? Well, then: You're a racist.'
Posted September 22, 2009, 1:30 PM by Jonathan Kay
"Jerry Seinfeld: 'Hello? Who is this? Donna Chang? Oh, I'm sorry, I must have dialed the wrong number.'
Elaine:'Donna Chang?'
Jerry: 'Should have talked to her. I love Chinese women.'
Elaine: 'Isn't that a little racist?'
Jerry: 'If I like their race, how can that be racist?'
- Seinfeld Episode #90, The Chinese Woman, Oct. 13 1994."
What's next? Is the ever-probing CHRC going to ask BCF and the National Post to cough?
There really should be a full parliamentary hearing about the goings-on of the CHRC. Canadians have a right to know what websites the CHRC is "monitoring", and the justification for it in each case. Let's see the un-redacted e-mails and other documents.
Ilsa Lynch is the lowest creature in Canada.