The purpose of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is to make a case for intrusive government intervention in our lives.
That is why the IPCC exists.
The bias is in the name and the name is predicated on the notion that there is a problematic aspect to climate change that requires government intervention on a global scale.
The IPCC doesn't exist to get at the scientific truth.
Will it never end.....so it makes one wonder just what the IPCC report will say....how in the world do they back off and soft soap. The pressure for them to do it right will be immense.
The IPCC making up something? OMG,I am amazed,NOT.
I wonder what the dinosaurs would have thought about some monkey in the tree telling them that CO2 was a toxin?
p&p.....red ed is easy to get rid of.Just tell him that all crop on his farm is dying from all that CO2
For those keeping track of indisputable errors in the current version of the IPCC world report
1. – the representation that the IPCC report represents a consensus of thousands of scientists – laid waste by Lindzen’s explanation of how the process works with contributors reviewing only the content within their area of expertise and even then not having a chance to review the policy summary
2. – accelerated Himalayan glacier melt – laid waste by the Indian government follow up
3. – significant upward trend in hurricane caused property losses – laid waste by Pielke’s comments
And I see that Lord Moncton in 2007 (http://ff.org/centers/csspp/press/20070302_release.html) said he found 31 exaggerations or errors in the document and that the heavily-corrected version of the IPCC report has been furtively posted on the IPCC’s website.
All in addition to the debunked "hockey stick" graphics.
I expect to see even more errors being pointed out going forward.
I'm not even surprised,let alone "shocked" any more by the machinations of the IPCC. They have NO credibility with anyone whose IQ is greater than their shoe size.
Everything they've produced has been "tweaked", misrepresented, or outright lied about,so this new feature of the IPCC, asking questions and answering it themselves was inevitable.
The MSM will probably follow suit and soon we'll hear A-M Tremonte and friends at CBC ask an absent PM Harper,"did you know Canadian troops were turning detainees over to Afghan authorities who might have mistreated them"?
And answering,"certainly I knew,we've been covering it up since we took office".
With a few more interviews like that, Canada should be safe in the bosom of the LPC in NO time!
Some day before I kick of this little blue planet,I hope I live to see these fraudsters where they belong,and Kate can post a "The Sound of Definetly NOT Settled Science,But Definetly A Scam" headline.
Check out the National Post front page of their website.(sorry i dont know how to paste the link I'm a computer idiot) Anyway, it comes to pass that NOAA is not using very many of Canada's weather stations in their calculations of recent "warming". And MSM is covering it..... But NOAA is DENYING it.
The globull warming crowd should study the great Dar Heatherington of Lethbridge Alberta. The IPPPCCDOOFUSSES and the rest of the Algore Suzukster charlatans have not realized that telling another lie to cover up your first lie and following the second lie with a third and a forth lie just gets you in deeper. The Fraud has been exposed, even the dumbest of the dumb should never have believed the scam in the first place, and news reporters IQ's are below the Dumb, so they have an excuse for believing this trash. Like I said before, watch these crooks turn on each other like ex smokers turn on their one time travelers as this unravels and fools start to see how stupid they were to believe in Als lies.
Justthinkin
[......Some day before I kick of this little blue planet,I hope I live to see these fraudsters where they belong,and Kate can post a "The Sound of Definetly NOT Settled Science,But Definetly A Scam" headline.]
Buddy I hate to break the news to ya---you will live in hope but die of despair. You won't live that long.
OIL FOR FOOD----how many were ever imprisoned or even tried---including the SG of the UN and his kid.
Mo Strong is wanted by the US for something else.
Iraq---not the UN nor the ICJ----made Saddam do the rope dance for gassing kurds....
Why this blog? Until this moment
I have been forced
to listen while media
and politicians alike
have told me
"what Canadians think".
In all that time they
never once asked.
This is just the voice
of an ordinary Canadian
yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
homepage email Kate (goes to a private
mailserver in Europe)
I can't answer or use every
tip, but all are
appreciated!
"I got so much traffic afteryour post my web host asked meto buy a larger traffic allowance."Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you
send someone traffic,
you send someone TRAFFIC.
My hosting provider thought
I was being DDoSed. -
Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generatedone-fifth of the trafficI normally get from a linkfrom Small Dead Animals."Kathy Shaidle
"Thank you for your link. A wave ofyour Canadian readers came to my blog! Really impressive."Juan Giner -
INNOVATION International Media Consulting Group
I got links from the Weekly Standard,Hot Air and Instapundit yesterday - but SDA was running at least equal to those in visitors clicking through to my blog.Jeff Dobbs
"You may be anasty right winger,but you're not nastyall the time!"Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collectingyour welfare livelihood."Michael E. Zilkowsky
IPCC has become very good at making up stuff. It even has fellow travellers here in Saskatchewan.
Climategate III
The purpose of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is to make a case for intrusive government intervention in our lives.
That is why the IPCC exists.
The bias is in the name and the name is predicated on the notion that there is a problematic aspect to climate change that requires government intervention on a global scale.
The IPCC doesn't exist to get at the scientific truth.
Scrap the IPCC, Canada out of the UN.
>>Canada out of the UN.
And Alberta out of Canada.
Can we get rid OF STALE-MACH first?
Will it never end.....so it makes one wonder just what the IPCC report will say....how in the world do they back off and soft soap. The pressure for them to do it right will be immense.
The IPCC making up something? OMG,I am amazed,NOT.
I wonder what the dinosaurs would have thought about some monkey in the tree telling them that CO2 was a toxin?
p&p.....red ed is easy to get rid of.Just tell him that all crop on his farm is dying from all that CO2
For those keeping track of indisputable errors in the current version of the IPCC world report
1. – the representation that the IPCC report represents a consensus of thousands of scientists – laid waste by Lindzen’s explanation of how the process works with contributors reviewing only the content within their area of expertise and even then not having a chance to review the policy summary
2. – accelerated Himalayan glacier melt – laid waste by the Indian government follow up
3. – significant upward trend in hurricane caused property losses – laid waste by Pielke’s comments
And I see that Lord Moncton in 2007 (http://ff.org/centers/csspp/press/20070302_release.html) said he found 31 exaggerations or errors in the document and that the heavily-corrected version of the IPCC report has been furtively posted on the IPCC’s website.
All in addition to the debunked "hockey stick" graphics.
I expect to see even more errors being pointed out going forward.
But was that made up comment Peer reviewed through the IPCC Global Warming Hysterics sausage machine?
I'm not even surprised,let alone "shocked" any more by the machinations of the IPCC. They have NO credibility with anyone whose IQ is greater than their shoe size.
Everything they've produced has been "tweaked", misrepresented, or outright lied about,so this new feature of the IPCC, asking questions and answering it themselves was inevitable.
The MSM will probably follow suit and soon we'll hear A-M Tremonte and friends at CBC ask an absent PM Harper,"did you know Canadian troops were turning detainees over to Afghan authorities who might have mistreated them"?
And answering,"certainly I knew,we've been covering it up since we took office".
With a few more interviews like that, Canada should be safe in the bosom of the LPC in NO time!
The Nobel committee looks sharper and sharper every day, don't it?
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/copenhagen/article6959509.ece
Al Gore tries to cool ‘climate spin’ by correcting claims of North pole thaw
Calling Fruit-Fly Guy......
"GLOBAL Warming" NEEDS YOU!!
This simply takes the lawyer's rule-of-thumb -- don't ask someone a question if you know you want like his answer -- one step further.
Some day before I kick of this little blue planet,I hope I live to see these fraudsters where they belong,and Kate can post a "The Sound of Definetly NOT Settled Science,But Definetly A Scam" headline.
could some one please dig up ONE IPCC truth, just one
"could some one please dig up ONE IPCC truth, just one
Posted by: GYM at January 20, 2010 6:16 PM "
Sure GYM.....er....wait...oh yeah....we(IPCC) are the scientific(snicker) arm of the UN,and we want your money,your kids,and one world-goverance.
Nice interview with author Thomas Fuller over at PJTV:
http://www.pjtv.com/video/PJTV_Daily/Climategate_Heats_Up_As_Liberal_Author_Jumps_Ship/2966/
Check out the National Post front page of their website.(sorry i dont know how to paste the link I'm a computer idiot) Anyway, it comes to pass that NOAA is not using very many of Canada's weather stations in their calculations of recent "warming". And MSM is covering it..... But NOAA is DENYING it.
This is the NP story Rick Rae is referring to.
The globull warming crowd should study the great Dar Heatherington of Lethbridge Alberta. The IPPPCCDOOFUSSES and the rest of the Algore Suzukster charlatans have not realized that telling another lie to cover up your first lie and following the second lie with a third and a forth lie just gets you in deeper. The Fraud has been exposed, even the dumbest of the dumb should never have believed the scam in the first place, and news reporters IQ's are below the Dumb, so they have an excuse for believing this trash. Like I said before, watch these crooks turn on each other like ex smokers turn on their one time travelers as this unravels and fools start to see how stupid they were to believe in Als lies.
Justthinkin
[......Some day before I kick of this little blue planet,I hope I live to see these fraudsters where they belong,and Kate can post a "The Sound of Definetly NOT Settled Science,But Definetly A Scam" headline.]
Buddy I hate to break the news to ya---you will live in hope but die of despair. You won't live that long.
OIL FOR FOOD----how many were ever imprisoned or even tried---including the SG of the UN and his kid.
Mo Strong is wanted by the US for something else.
Iraq---not the UN nor the ICJ----made Saddam do the rope dance for gassing kurds....
They have NO credibility with anyone whose IQ is greater than their shoe size
Is that UK, Canada/US, or continental shoe size? Because my IQ is higher than my Canadian she size but
Um. never mind...