"The CHRC was deemed in all three cases to have failed to comply with the law..."

| 27 Comments

Canadian Taxpayers Federation;

The Canadian "Human Rights" Commission (CHRC) has "placed itself in a position of deemed refusal" according to the Information Commissioner of Canada in response to complaints filed by the Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF). After months of wrangling with the federal government's chief censorship body, the CTF was able to obtain records from the CHRC revealing that Chief Commissar Jennifer Lynch spent much more on flights and hospitality than she revealed online, and that what she disclosed was at times nearly half of the actual cost.

The CTF filed three separate Access to Information Requests in August of 2009 to obtain details on Lynch's expenses. The CHRC refused to provide information within the legally allotted time frame as it would "unreasonably interfere with the operations of the [Commission]," but finally bowed to pressure and released the documents more than a month late.

h/t BCF, who has this highly related item.


27 Comments

BCF... "good morning Jenny" hahaha. too funny, does your telephone sometimes have that strange click in the background too? and all that ;)

If we didn't know better, we'd think that the CHRC trained climate scientists.

$10,400 wasted on a 2008 trip to Geneva

• $10,300 on a 2008 trip to Dublin and Copenhagen

• $8,893 squandered on airfare alone for a 2008 trip to Malaysia

• $8,323 blown on a 2007 trip to Geneva

• $7,140 minimum on a 2008 trip Vienna, of which the actual figures are not yet released


Achtung, Frau Lynch your larcenous reach into the public treasury for luxury trips on "Howard Hughes Airlines" vill nicht be gestattet.

Political "Minengefahr!!" Visiting Mr. Schickelgruber in Vienna ist not a "CHRC business expense". Vell, vell, vel...velcome to Germany Frau Lynch, so you like to break ze FOI law?

You vill repay zis amount at vonce, or vee send you to ze Eastern Front. Ach du lieber, I forgot you are an eastern affront!

Freedom of speech...you haf no idea!

Cheers


Hans-Christian Georg Rupprecht, Commander in Chief

1st Saint Nicolaas Army
Army Group “True North"

Any fraudulently obtained and/or reported money should be clawed back from her.

Then she should be charged.

Then she should be fired.

Then she should have any pension benefits canceled.

Wait till Ezra gets hold of this one...should be a good read on his blog

Let us see now:

The commissar of the Canadian commission for denying freedom for those they don’t like is hobnobbing with those that oppose freedom in the first order of their government, how appropriate.
….Algeria and Morocco….Bangladesh, Cameroon, Cuba, Kyrgyzstan, Russia….Saudi Arabia…..Malaysia… in whose mind is this collection of despots to advise on human rights?
One must wander who does the commissar talk to about at these meetings. Then again, the commissar probably or let me say definetly, does not care about human rights, this is the way to get into the “high society” the socialist aristocracy that does meetings in exotic places where the plebeians pay for their outings.
The woman should be fired, the CHRC should be cut out of federal and provicial budgets, if anybody wants one, maybe they should pick up a collection, see how much the population cares.

The avarice proves it's not about human rights, it's about you, Jennifer. No amount of money is going to cover that ache where your sold out soul languishes.

Wait till Ezra gets hold of this one...should be a good read on his blog
Posted by: nnm at January 28, 2010 4:02 PM "

ya Ezra has a knack fo taking it and running with it. he's got yet another frivolous suit on his plate now. by some 'sock puppet' with a middle eastern name.

so is steve-o going to do some behind-the-scenes moves against Lynch? any of the CPC operatives gonna take a crack at her or is it to be allowed to fester still thus emboldening the chrc types for ever greater conquest?

I agree with you, Fred. I want this done publicly for maximum loss of dignity.

L/liberal$ always seem to think that a patronage appointment in the government, or being the government, means that taxpayers' dollars are their personal bank account.

I guess it doesn't occur to the media that this kind of money grab is in any way dishonourable, duplicitous, or constitutes fraud -- which would necessitate their exposure of such misuse of public funds, wouldn't it? -- seeing as many of them are recipients of the l/Liberal$' largesse and they like it that way.

Of course, this is why so many of the l/Liberal$ in government and the media loathe Stephen Harper. With him as Prime Minister, no more gravy train -- except for the Liberal$' patronage appointments in the CHRC.

FIRE. THEM. ALL. NO. MORE. GRAVY. TRAIN.

Why a beautiful blond such as Jennifer feels compelled to always dye her roots black, is just beyond this one man's comprehension!

'Course, with the astronomical cost of dye 'n all these days, and ALL those glitterati events 'n such, a girl's gotta find SOME way to pay for it, no?

Click click click all the time Marc;)


I'm reading "Shakedown."

Personal expenses seem minor when considered in the context of the total costs of the HRC across Canada, just in their existence, and especially in their abuse of power.
Total waste of taxpayers money.

Fire.Them.All.

Oh yeah - Er, Jennifer, with regards those roots ...

Pull.Them.All.

"The CHRC refused to provide information within the legally allotted time frame as it would "unreasonably interfere with the operations of the [Commission],"' Who can argue with that. Any work in the service of the taxpayer would get in the way of a year-long bender. Besides, it's hard to do paperwork with a hangover.
As an aside, does this post expose Jennifer Lynch to hatred and contempt?

This whole CHRC matter just points up to a Civil Service stacked with LIBRANOs----like Justice which still publishes Sarah Brady Foundation myths as science. The bureaucrats (claiming to be scientists) at ENVIRONMENT still howl about melting Polar Bears----
These commissars are dug in tight as ticks....with iron rice-bowls.

Lynch is a product of what Glenn Beck calls, the 'progressive' propaganda cult. She is a nasty, ego-centric, human hating, envy ridden, pimple on the nation. The pimple has come to a head (and seems to be a black head!) sooo..what is to be done?

Like others here, a very public trial, firing, seizing of all assets and jail time will help me to 'understand'.

Lets get started.

A big 'shout out' to the CTPA. Well done.

Not at all surprised that Lynch and crew consider themselves above the law, after all laws only apply to the common folk, nest-ce pas? What is surprising and unacceptable however is the government's inaction. Not only must Lynch be removed (and not simply to be appointed to another position within government) but she must be prosecuted for breaking the law. After that the whole CHR Act and the CHRC must be demolished.

Aren't people supposed to go to jail for stealing government funds? I heard that someplace one time...

For anyone who wants a good laugh at Dawg's expense scroll down to the update - http://tinyurl.com/ydk2yaz

poodledoc has NEVER suffered from self doubt....poodledoc will shake this affront off....poodledoc will pity poor Ms Kay....from a distance of course..

M. le poodle will be incommunicado while his wounds heal....he is licking them as i type....that lushing sound you hear is his long moist pink tongue licking and repairing the damage to his amour propre(situated on his rump don't you know....just under his schlep schwanze)....but i'll make book he heals and rebounds like the purebred he is....M. le poodle is VERY resilient....and knows that humanity depends upon him for so very very much...

Jennifer Lynch should be publicly "lynched" - I agree with "the Phantom" - she should go to jail for theft from the government!!

It's obvious there's an endemic pathology in this commission that holds it to be above the law and beyond scrutiny by mere mortals. This commission has gone rogue and needs PMO or Judicial intervention to clean it out.

Any SCC justice with even a modest deferment to the rule of law under charter legal rights will laugh that CHRC factum out of the courtroom.

Steyn has weighed in on the Censory pleasures of our Klepto-Kommissars - http://www.steynonline.com/content/view/2869/128/

I wonder what she knows ? She must have a grave yard of skeletons in reserve to stay on after these allegations.
The right to destroy people by censorship so you can travel the World on others dime. Disgusting!!!
JMO

The National Post ran an article on Thursday about the appeal of Hadjis's decision. I found the following section interesting:

"The Supreme Court of Canada last upheld Section 13 as a justifiable limit on free expression in 1990, in part on the basis of its remedial and non-punitive purpose. Eight years later, the penalty provision was added by Parliament, allowing for fines of $10,000."

"Mr. Hadjis decided this amendment means Section 13 'can no longer be considered exclusively remedial, preventative and conciliatory in nature'."

As I recall, the Supreme Court in 1990 upheld a jail term for Jim Keegstra, so the section was clearly far from merely "remedial" even back then. At that time, the Supreme Court was playing with Section 1 reasonable-limits exemptions from Charter rights the way a three-year-old boy plays with a new fire truck on Christmas morning: they couldn't keep their hands off it. The Court was led at the time by Brian Dickson (who wrote the judgment), an extremely shallow mind. Current chief justice Beverley McLachlin wrote the dissent.

The term "remedial" in this context has to be an anti-concept, because the purpose of government is to protect individual rights. That sometimes includes meting out punishment to transgressors. Jail terms and fines are clearly forms of punishment, and the entire notion of a court or tribunal judgment that forces you to do something that isn't considered a punishment is frankly Orwellian.

i must say i found Ms Kay's evisceration of the poodledoc's pensees every bit the salutary nostrum as Mark Steyn's autopsy of johnny miller's ignorant opinionations(the 'journalism doctor').......

i dunno....something about the stylish pillorying of fatuous fart-filled clueless amateurs who stick their twitching diapproving snouts into business they have no truly clear understanding of just sets me up for the day...

they say i look a decade younger today....and i feel it !

Leave a comment

Archives