...and Krauthammered. More.
Update thought: Imagine a doctor, of German origin, in the Canadian Army in 1944 speaking favourably of the Herrenvolk and the Reich's need for Lebensraum.
...and Krauthammered. More.
Update thought: Imagine a doctor, of German origin, in the Canadian Army in 1944 speaking favourably of the Herrenvolk and the Reich's need for Lebensraum.
Come on people! things like this do not happen in Obamerica, the world loves the USA now that the messiah has come.
So now Obama will put all the strength and resources of the Office of the Presidency behind a co-ordinated effort to fabricate and substantiate via Liberal Experts any and all reasons for this tragedy that does not arrive at the conclusion that this was a terrorist act. How could it be since the war on terror is over?
He will do this tirelessly and will not be deterred in his pursuit of this goal so that nobody can say he allowed a terrorist attack in Obamamerica because it is really bad for re-elections and Obama's approval polls.
Imagine an officer in the CDN army during WWII calling the war an unjust war and sympathetic of Nazi hatred of Jews?
oh wait... Trudeau.
"He will do this tirelessly and will not be deterred in his pursuit of this goal so that nobody can say he allowed a terrorist attack in Obamamerica because it is really bad for re-elections and Obama's approval polls."
Hmm...
If so, why put Khalid on trial?
I'd say the right hand has no idea what the left hand is doing here.
Not very auspicious.
Barack Obama - The Incredible Shrinking President.
"If Obama was in the forest and ALL the trees fell down, would he hear a sound?"
-- Caller Bobby Z. from Chicago, on Dennis Miller's show earlier today
There it is once more ... the Socratic gaze, the pause, and the voice, always the voice saying the profoundest things, proving that, deep down, this man is shallow. Or perhaps it's the listeners?
Perfect, larben.
How many more years of the:
pause, uh, pause, uh?
There has to be a reason why he can't speak from the heart.
Stealing a term from the warmist/tree huggers....I can't help but feel we are approaching, or are at, a "tipping point."
OT: Here's our favourite Canadian AGW scientist ^W media celebrity activist doing the BO pose - photo headshot, nobly and steadfastly looking off into the brilliant, but difficult-to-achieve (because of those pesky plebes in the way) future:
http://tinyurl.com/ydxbt4z
Too bad MT doesn't allow strikethrough.
langmann said "oh wait... Trudeau."
You beat me to it. Everything that is wrong with Canada today can be summed up in one word, "Trudeau". Marxist, racist, antisemitic, rich kid.
The newspapers of the day let Canada down back then just like the newspapers of today have let America down now.
So just for argument's sake, hypothetically speaking: If there was an attack by a jihadist who fired on the soldiers, what would he do differently from this man?
Major Wacko must've been planning on dying during his internal terrorist mission. As is the usual protocol, because "God Is Great", the rally means to take as many lives as you can before you get dusted off and ushered into His divine presence. The eternal reward must be irresistibly enticing, to attract such learned and gifted servants into the fold. The indoctrination of the species seems to reach a point of active fruition at indeterminate times. But to remain alive, and have to come up with some answers for his infidelic inquisitors, is shameful. I mean, he couldn't even commit suicide and maybe blow up a few more people before he was incapacitated? Now it's going to be a boring and laborious time of live dissection before they fire up "old sparky" and dispatch the Major on the final leg of his interrupted journey.
We hear the insane and hideous pronouncements from the Koran on what you "gotta" do if your an F'n Muzzie and it's so sick and twisted that we take a pass on it. Like no one in their right mind could swallow this crap.
The Muzzies on the other hand just love insane and hideous pronouncements and go to town with it.
Therein lies the difference.
"If there was an attack by a jihadist who fired on the soldiers, what would he do differently from this man?"
Dunno. Not get himself fragged by a chick, maybe?
Phantom, that comment was just "mean-spirited". Remember the term "mean-spirited"? Used to apply to anyone not falling in line with left-speak.
Another current leftism is "sustainable". It's another great word co-opted and parroted by the left and sycophants to the extent that it now means nothing.
I was just catching up on the videos uploaded by Matt. Here's an interesting one.
What's ironic about it is that the house socialist, Andrea Calver, spouting her usual moral equivalency, seemed to be using Marc Lepine as an example of mass murder carried out by non-Muslim extremists. She seemed completely oblivious to the fact that Lepine's birth name was Gamil Gharbi and his father was an Algerian Muslim wife-beater (as per several columns by Mark Steyn).
If 9/11 were to occur while Obama was President the MSM headlines would be along the lines of
"Pres. Obama to call inquiry in Airline safety."
Posted by: Robert W. (Vancouver) at November 14, 2009 1:58 AM:
I saw that show "live" and was bewildered why she had to change the focus back to the Montreal Massacre (actually, I wasn't surprised, it was a knee-jerk defence mechanism on her part, but anyway).
That's not what Coren was talking about. He was talking about violence in the Islamic world and violence perpetrated by Muslims upon Muslims.
Coren didn't mention Marc Lepine's original name or upbringing. I thought he might.
She changed the subject because she is fearful, IMO. Or a totally brainwashed lefty.
You really have to wonder about some people. Perhaps money and fragile, self-perceived, unearned status (AKA rented ego) keeps them going despite reality falling all around them.
PiperPaul: You really have to wonder about some people [vis a vis leftard Andrea Calver]. Perhaps money and fragile, self-perceived, unearned status (AKA rented ego) keeps them going despite reality falling all around them.
I think you've hit the nail on the head.
On another thread, the topic was women bloggers with balls, which led to some speculation about the female of the species and her fierceness when riled having to do, IMO, with women's true grit and no-nonsense approach to life as it pertains to motherhood.
True grit USED to be the default position for Canadian women when most of us were mothers fiercely guarding our children and family members. During the Trudeaupian Dispensation, the push was on to get moms out of their homes (fiefdoms they staunchly defended against the pack) for two reasons: 1) to collect taxes from women who up to then had no money with which to build up the government coffers and 2) to disarm a potent force intent on rugged individualism and individual rights, not collectivist rights which, we know, the leftards needed us to "buy" in order to forward their socialist, herd-mentality agenda.
Now that we have forced women en masse into the work place, the government coffers have overflowed -- not to our advantage, as they've been used to forward social "programs," and women are just as likely as men, often moreso in the guise of radical feminism, to blindly buy into the status quo, to support the zeitgeist.
We lost a lot more than stay-at-home moms and civilized kids when we herded women into the workplace.
As always batb, I enjoy your insight.
Thanks, Terry!
I speak from personal experience in the trenches. I stayed home with my kids in the '80s and was considered Enemy #1 by the feminists and the l/Liberal$ (who punished one-income families by taxing us to the max).
I saw, firsthand, how women making money in the workplace tended to be blind to, and blindsided by, the rapid-fire assaults on the sovereignty of the family by government-funded social programs (which, BTW, were never extended to one-income families with a parent home to care for the kid/s) and, thus, the well-being of their own children. Some of their acquiescence was simply due to their being overwhelmed by their dual responsibilities and not enough hours in the day, but the other reason they surrendered to the collectivist status quo was that acquiescence, aka political corrrectness, was required if they were going to continue to collect their salaries. Even if they didn't agree with the new goose-step "everyone" was doing, they kept their mouths shut.
I didn't. Although my politically incorrect opinions often resulted in my being unpopular with the l/Liberal$, the feminists, the Dippers and meant that my husband and I were excluded from the social lists of many of the elites in town, I never passed up an opportunity to express my increasingly skeptical opinions about the dangers of social engineering, the increasingly early sexualization of our children, etc. etc.
I had no salary to lose (we lived very frugally). I had no boss to please, no "power" to forfeit. What I did have, however, was the responsibility and obligation to ensure the safety, health, and well-being of my family, which meant standing on the watchtower and being extremely vigilant concerning what was coming up over the hill. I noticed any stranger in the neighbourhood, I monitored the latest lies from NAC/SOW which were seeping into our schools, I kept on top of the sex "ed" in my kids' classrooms.
If you'll also notice, Terry, we don't have this discussion in Canada, as there are certain subjects you "can't" talk about in the Deranged Dominion north of the 49th parallel. This makes me all the more determined to start the discussion -- and cut to the quick!
batb, we males failed in that regard.
Another current leftism is "sustainable". It's another great word co-opted and parroted by the left and sycophants to the extent that it now means nothing.
~PiperPaul
On the contrary, sustainable still means something and is defined by Leftists as "under government control and supported by taxes rather than the profit motive".
As I was saying above...
Fresh off the AP..
Obama urges Congress to put off Fort Hood probe
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iwYEFasV3WqznkJoN2-BwTxAN4fgD9BV8RHG1
batb, I salute you.
You people are all alarmists - having rabid Islamic terrorists promoted to Major is a not sign of dysfunction.
Having one as Commander-in-Chief in the White House is. I'm looking at you - Barack Hussein Obama.
while training in britain my father's seaforth highlander regiment was commanded by the very very much respected vancouver boy lt col bert hoffmeister(died 1999)...
while marching past bert after an exhausting exercise it was routine for some seaforth wag to shout out one variation or another of.."you're on the wrong side hoffmeister!'.
Thank you, Kyla!
PiperPaul, in what regard, exactly, did males fail. I can think of a few!, but I'd like to hear from your perspective what the failures were.
The SCFM (State Controlled Fringe Media) and Democrats' slant on the Fort Hood massacre were predictable and unsurprising. Somewhere, in the murky past, a long term decision must have been made by the extreme left that they would "protect" and support certain ethnic, religious, and racial groups no matter what, in the belief that eventually this support would result in votes to install a permanent one party government under their direction.
It is interesting that there has been such a reaction to trying Islamist terrorists in New York, but no one seems to have mentioned an obvious political purpose. Wouldn't the time line for such a trial set up Republicans from the Bush administration for a monumental drag through the mud next door to all the HQ's of leftist "Media Lapdogs R' Us" as big "O" is campaigning hard for re-election?
Sgt Lejaune: "... in the murky past, a long term decision must have been made by the extreme left that they would 'protect' and support certain ethnic, religious, and racial groups no matter what ..."
It seems clear to me that the extreme left's agenda was to discredit and get rid of Christianity and law-and-order British heritage. The left knew that a frontal attack wouldn't work -- there'd be pushback if it was too obvious -- so they decided to come in the back door: elevate every faith EXCEPT the foundational Judeo-Christian faith of Western Civilization and demonize believing Christians, especially if they're in the public square.
A marriage made in Hell is that between the left and militant Islamists. The Islamofascists are a very convenient and potent battering ram the left have used, and are using, against Christianity and Christians.
Let's remember that it was European Christians who stood in the gap and defended Europe from invasion and total subjugation by the Islamist hordes for hundreds of years. Now that Christianity is under the gun from the left in our media and in our educational, judicial, and political institutions, the West is in serious trouble vis a vis threats from militant Islam -- and the left couldn't be more gleeful.
You stupid people!!! Don't you know this is all your fault? Obama tells Americans this every day what evil mongrels they are.
Just like Trudeau used his middle finger to Canadians. Congress just does what it pleases & Parliament here the same. Both our Senates your elected ours not have become palliative care unites for the politically old. Both just go status quo as they have become the very pillars of that monument built for themselves.
JMO
Rev.Dr; well to be slightly more accurate, Trudeau gave the finger to Western Canada (B.C. specifically). On the other hand he did "fuddle duddle " parliament...
I totally agree with batb on the Christianity angle: the leftists have done everything in their power to discredit Christianity (aided and abetted, unfortunately, by many non leftists who seem quite happy to join the "discredit party" on this issue).
The very foundation of the rule of law, our freedoms, and civil behaviour—not to mention courage and steadfastness in the face of a clear and present danger—has been eroded from right under our feet (generally, with both our money and our eyes wide shut): believe me, the election of a dangerous impostor to POTUS is just the latest and most dramatic symptom of “post civilization syndrome”, something that all of us, who have eyes to see and ears to hear, notice every day—with alarm.
The precipitous decline of Christianity in the West has been matched by an equal decline in honesty, civility, and courage. Kyrie eleison.
P.S. I note that there are many committed Christians in Stephen Harper’s caucus. Deo gratias! (I appreciate that our PM regularly says “God bless Canada.”) And which government has had the cojones to redraft the standards expected of immigrants to our “deranged dominion” (Mark Steyn)? It’s about time—maybe too late, but better than the pandering claptrap of the Liberals, which has flooded this country with far too many non-productive to criminal, and oh-so-entitled, newcomers.
Many people have entirely the wrong idea about Christianity: the real thing is certainly not for sissies. As one atheist, who happens to be an admirer, said, “I like Christianity because it’s a blood religion!” ’Not for the faint hearted, that’s for sure. (Which is why I’ve turned my back on panty waist Protestantism.) Rip the heart out of a body and it dies: we spurn Christianity, the foundation of so much that made Western Civilization great, at our peril.
lookout: " ... Rip the heart out of a body and it dies ..."
Amen.
Krauthammer
One of the last sane old school reporters left.
A real intellect, instead of the parade of squirrelly ones.The characters we usually have to suffer threw their obsessions. If not neurosis on TV.
He See's what going on with clear eye's. To bad most others are so far into their own twisted fake Matrix, they can't see the sword descending.
What do you expect when you destroy your cultural foundation & replace it with balsa wood? Yup. Collapse.
JMO