"They are nothing like they are portrayed by these mercenary journalists"

Well, at least it's good to see that these people are adopting modern technology into their cultures (I sure as hell don't know how to wire IEDs, get and strap explosives to brainwashed/ignorant drones or plan to cause mass human casualties in some country that I know nothing about). Well done, progress is being made!

That beheading thing could be automated though, it'd be much more efficient.

A chilling video indeed.

Unreal.
Fine example of pure ignorance and racism, given a voice.
May he fully experience what he so readily preaches other to believe and do.
One of many with the multi-headed snake called Islamic terrorism.
Irony would be lost on him as he puts down the whites via kkk, and then calls for the death of Americans and then yes the Jews too, because his god's book says to do so...unreal.
And what the heck was he talking about the nuclear plant at Lake Michigan being the main provider of electricity to Africa?
Huh?

I think they need to be done in, before they do us in.

That goat-humper with the lampshade on his head, made it clear that there is absolutely no sitting down to talk with these people allowed. There will be no peace.

There is nothing to talk about with these droids. They are devoid of ideas, innovation, civic progress, human fellowship or anything that identifies human progress and development.
We should not be letting any of them into our country. I say let none of them in because you cannot tell which of them are radical, which of them are merely supporters of the radical, nor which of them are going along with it so as not be killed by their friends and family. I have only seen one or two of them stand up publicly against the Jihad and they are in hiding 24/7.

One of the ironies of these scummy people is that if they ever managed to fulfill their dream of killing all the infidels in the world, they will promptly ramp up the killing of each other as many of them already do .. and over the slightest disagreement in the pettiest of matters and perceived differences.

They are not evolved enough to live in a modern world. We must deny them habitat in our world. They are spreading throughout the globe like a cancer. End all Muslim immigration now while it is still possible.

But then, I am surely preaching to the choir on this blog.

The Left re-wrote history to make the Crusaders the bad guys. Maybe they knew something we didn't (or what some of us don't want to recognize).

And if that suitcase full of anthrax is ever released in New York or Washington DC, then a real "war against terrorism' will begin. But this time, nuclear weapons will be part of the arsenal.

The Soviet Foreign Minister, Andrei Gromyko, discussing the seizure of the American Embassy in Tehran in 1979, said that if the Russian Embassy had been seized, Tehran would be a smouldering crater by lunchtime.

Well it came to pass that Mahab the Arab, Chief of the Burning Sands (see YouTube above), was very disappointed in his son.

He summoned his son as he reclined on his couch eating dates like there was no tomorrow.

"Abdul, why do you wish to be a burden to your father? I cannot tolerate this juvenile delinquency. Why are you not constantly thinking about killing Americans and Canadians? Why are you not thinking about stabbing your sister? Why are you not thinking of stoning your mother? I'm embarrassed to show my face at mosque."

Little Abdul was reduced to tears. "But Father, look at this device that I have constructed in science class," he said, producing a complicated model.

"As you can see, Father, it beheads Americans while also serving as a cigarette lighter. And if you reverse it, you can grind coffee beans."

Mahab the Arab, Chief of the Burning Sands, felt a warm smile spreading on his leathery countenance.

"I now see that my concerns were misplaced. You are actually a very intelligent young man, proficient in the sciences. This calls for celebration. We will slaugher an additional camel for lunch.

"They are the most honorable people in the world, the best people in the world"

Wow, who knew that strapping bombs onto mentally handicapped adults would qualify one in the running for the award of "best people in the world".

That this f#$%stick idiot even has an audience to cheer on his sick and hateful schtick is all one needs to know about the "religion of peace".

Gee, I wonder why I get the feeling that I still have one more battle to fight before I can "hang up" my combat boots.

GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEZ !

All the "progressives" sipping their lattes in the cafes in Toronto and Vancouver need to understand this very clearly: when this 7th century genocidist speaks of what he wants to do to Americans, he means to do it to them as well.

We'd better all lace up our combat boots.

""They are the most honorable people in the world, the best people in the world"

Wow, who knew that strapping bombs onto mentally handicapped adults would qualify one in the running for the award of "best people in the world".

kingstonlad....why not? The cult leader Goracle got a nobel(yes,I now refuse to capitalize that once great award). Maybe this goatf&*ker is looking for his "peace prize" so he can say he got one along with AraRAT!!

The guy is spouting pure BS. What field did he get his doctorate in - Islamic Studies?
First of all, anthrax does not kill within one hour. Secondly, if the 'terrorist' dumped 4 pounds of anthrax powder on the White House lawn, he would expose a few dozen people at most, unless the weather conditions were right to disperse the powder efficiently. I would imagine that if he were able even to approach the White House lawn with a briefcase full of white powder, he would be incapacitated by the security people before he could even open the case.
This guy, in spite of (or perhaps because of) his doctorate, sounds like some sort of simple-minded conspiracy theorist.
An anthrax attack is possible, but certainly would require a great deal more planning than this bone-headed cleric seems to believe.

...End all Muslim immigration now while it is still possible.
But then, I am surely preaching to the choir on this blog.
Posted by: Momar at April 4, 2009 1:38 PM

I don't think so.

Can you call these animals human, when they laugh at the thought of over 300,000 being killed. This Religion is the embodiment of evil. This is the true barbarian with no redeeming qualities . Only blood will appease this type, educated or not. This group are stone cold killers. Educated Dexter’s. There is no poverty issue with this killing lover. Listen to the laughs & applause for death. He chuckles as he contemplates the rotting bodies of children, men & Women who have done him no harm.
He can make jolly all he wants. He seems to think that the West will just take it. Say goodbye to Mecca & Media if this guys wet dreams of mass butchery are carried out. Mushrooms will grow in the Middle East. Watch , Damascus will be the first to evaporate after this type of attack.
JMO

He's living testiment to the perils inbreeding, marrying little girls to their uncles for decades and you end up with a people marginally smarter than a bag of hammers.

Why must they wear the rags on their heads indoors? I don't get it, light bulb burn perhaps? Their grey matter doesn't get exposed to moon rays? Mocking the Islamic Radicals is the best weapon in our arsenal, they have not a modicum of sense of humour thus degrade them as they would like to do to us.

Anyone know when and where this speech took place?

Out of curiousity, I wonder how many SDA'ers actually act in some fashion to combat ideological Islam - namely by heighting the awareness of others to the danger?

Do most of us act on our concern or, as Momar says, do we just 'preach to the choir' by adding our comments here?

I occasionaly worry that my friends and relatives will tire of some of the more egregious examples I send to them, but send them I must. They can choose to read and consider the implications or simply delete instead.

For example, I sent this one on to at least thirty people, some 'right' some 'left' and most apathetic. But at least they can't say they were never warned.

A quick poll if you please: Are you a Paul Revere or a choir member?

"There is no room for dialogue." No.

No Guff: If I lived in a proper city, like Toronto, I'd go to rallies. That not being the case, I'm in the choir. What should I do, pester my friends and aquaintances? I'll e-mail this video to a friend. He'll say: "Oh, there are always extremists", and I'll say "What, this isn't indicative of major trends rather than fringe activity? Come on." and he'll say "Jerry Fallwell said the gays caused 9/11"... And then I'll give up because I like him and shouting matches bore me...
What do you suggest?

Paul Revere was my kind of guy.

What is really scary, is that this is not in the slightest bit unusual. There are plenty of his type preaching this crap all over the western world.

I still don't understand why bleeding hearts just don't understand the actual words coming out of the actual mouths of these pigs.

Mind you, they didn't take seriously Hitler's overt statements of intent to invade and persecute, either.

See the movie "Obsession".

No Guff,
I'm not sure if this applies, but I know of places where pictures of Mahab the Arab are taken off the computer and blown up to a large size.

Then people practice making head shots at 80 and 100 yards,

As for myself, my experience may be a little more like Kingstonlad. And if it comes down to it, I'll be working closer up.

Momar at April 4, 2009 1:38 PM

it is called Totalitarianism.

Totalitarianism is not a politcial ideology, philosphy or belief; it is a style of government.

Usually, it is a style of government adopted by "Those Who Know Best". There is a long history in Western Philosophy of the discussion of this idea. The man who rationalised this impulse was Plato, circa 400 BC (2,400 years ago). He suggested the best form of government was one of "Philosopher Kings". The "Kings" knew what was best for the people and society, being philosophers, and they would have autocratic control.

There are many other forms and styles of government, but generally it is those who want to "change the world" that adopt the Totalitarian style of government ... they do know best, after all :^)

Kingston Lad, a spelling correction is in order; that's "Religion of Piss".

Black Mamba, it's a pity you have just the one friend and that he's either a liberal, a dhimmi or perhaps both.

But if he's truly a friend, you'll do whatever you must in order to help protect him. And that means using rational, fact based and evidential persuasion to slowly awaken him to the peril that is political Islam.

Surely you'd warn him if you knew beyond doubt that someone was planning him grievous bodily harm. And that's exactly what is happening - the fact that it is directed in a more general way to the greater population rather than to him as a specific individual does not make the threat any less dangerous or any less real.

The only difference is it's imminence, not it's effect.

A gunshot or slow poison have the same result, it's only the speed that changes. And remember, his wilful ignorance is part of what puts you in peril, too.

"Oh well, what can I do" will eventually result in some very nasty business.

Black Mamba, I noted your query of "What should I do, pester my friends and aquaintances?"

As one who tries to be sensitive to those whose friendships I value, I too was concerned about being a pest.

I solved it quite simply. From time to time I ask them if they wish me to continue sending such materials to them and if not, to please drop me a line to say "no thanks". Of all the people in my address book, I've only had one person who has ever not wanted to be kept informed.

The upside is that in all likelihood, my many respondents send the information - which they'll never see on CBC/CTV - to people in their own address books.

And that's the true power of the internet.

how many SDAers act on these?

I do for one. I cut and paste and send it across the internet from Canada to Poland to Kasakstan, where ever my friends are located and my not yet be regular readers.

personally Im beginning to think we should Kaaba the lot of them , turn them to black glass.

No Guff,
Yeesh, aggressive. That's what I get for answering a "quick poll". Maybe a little guff wouldn't kill you. "What do you suggest?" was a perfectly straightforward question. If I'm lucky enough to have more than one friend, it's probably because I don't go ramming politics down everybody's throats every time I talk to them. Now I've lost friends over politics. But even in the worst of times, Guffy, there's more to life than ideology. I mean, there'd better be.
Boring and alienating your social circle won't help you any and it won't do much for Western Civilization, either. The line between "principled guy" and "obsessive crank" is worth bearing in mind.

No Guff: I'm retired so I do not have any work associates with whom I communicate who might have views differing from mine. I have picked my friends carefully so that they all have similar political views to my own. I makes life much easier. I can't be bothered to make nice to people with whose views I disagree. On occasion when in public and conversing with my friends (generally about politics) we have been rudely interrupted by people who have overheard our conversation and disagree with us and feel the need to correct our errors. We tend to demolish them verbally quite quickly, since we collectively are better informed than most of these people. For example, a couple of weeks ago we were engaged in a conversation, in a coffee house, about the Israeli intervention in Gaza when a fellow at the next table who was listening in on our conversation decided to put us straight on the matter. He observed that the Gazans were entitled to fire rockets indiscriminately into Israel since they had been subject to an oppressive occupation. I asked the fellow where he came from and he turned out to be a Moroccan, so I asked him what he thought about the Moroccan occupation of Western Sahara. That shut him up pretty quickly.
On the whole, though, we don't go out of our way to proselytize.

Actually, I send people these sorts of links all the bloody time - I just don't pretend that I'm saving the world when I do.

Do we have enough bacon fat to bury the ME under yet?

They say 'liberalism' is a mental disorder. What do you call this strain of islam? A virus? The west has to wake up.

As it comes to acting on this information, I think the key lies in striking a balance. No one likes to be preached to, and I don't preach. But sometimes things come up in conversation or in looking at a news headline and I think at that time that it's important to state rationally and clearly one's position, especially that these muslim extremist threats are real and that our society pays and will pay a huge price for naivete. Sometimes it can be as little as reinforcing the opinion of someone else who expresses a concern. Opportunities are out there. Just bear in mind that changing someone's opinion one way or the other is unlikely to occur in a single conversation. It takes time. Plant the seed. Let time and the facts do their work. Truth is on our side.

"It takes time. Plant the seed. Let time and the facts do their work. Truth is on our side."

I agree mostly, but not entirely. Kate's most recent article on the growth of mosques in France is a case in point.

It is germane to the risks posed by political Islam and the risks to not only French society, but to our own, over time.

Truth may well be on our side, but many people who would recognize it if they saw it, will never have the opportunity. None of the alarm bells will be rung within the MSM - ever.

So who then will bell the cat?

A favorite truism of mine is "if it is to be, it's up to me" and I try to do this in a non-hectoring, non-offensive way by simply pointing others to sites like SDA, asking them to read and evaluate for themselves.

Any society that is lost due to willful ignorance (and history is littered with them) has only itself to blame.

I think DrD said what I wanted to say.
What I meant was - and at this point, who'se reading but me? - I sometimes/often e-mail the latest WTF?! Muslim (and other) horror-story thing to people who a) feel the same way I do already or b) don't agree but like a debate. I don't pester people with whom I have a tacit agreement to avoid politics and I try not to bug people who just don't care about this stuff.
I consider myself a member of "the choir" because I don't think this actually constitutes "doing anything". I would really like to do something about people like our buddy al-Nafisi (note lame attempt to keep post on topic).
And when I call Toronto a "proper city" (reflecting on how some people feel about the place), I only mean it's big enough that if I lived there there would be real demos to attend, which is something I would do, something which I believe might almost amount to "doing something".