“If President Obama intends to find common ground with the Mullahs in Iran”

Come on Obama, man up. Take Rush out with a cruise missile. It would scare Iran worse than Reagan winning the election, and wouldn't violate any international treaties.

I hope Obama's weasles go after Limbaugh full tilt.

It will backfire big time!

Just like the Liberal media's playing up the financial crisis to help Obama push the porkulous bill is biting them in the ass by killing ad revenue.

l-0-l

'ET' was right about not attacking 'Obama' personally. They should be questioning every policy he and demo's are making. Rush should be very critical and vocal of all the policy makers including the 'Rhino,s' whom are on the band wagon with 'Obama'. Somebody has to awake America up [40%] that did not vote.

Link from Readers Tips: A very interesting read.
"Cramer: My Response To The White House"
Posted by: Daniel M. Ryan at March 5, 2009 8:29 AM

Here's an interesting and distrubing article on B
O's use of a teleprompter:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0309/19663.html

What's a little disturbing is that the writer did not write about this during the campaign and that even now doe not see something wrong with it - there is a big difference between teleprompter reading and reading from cue cards as cue cards demand the presenter at least know something about what they are saying.

That's only satire -this- week. Next week, that could be the headline on freakin' Drudge Report.

I find it absolutely terrifying that the Obama White House has declared war on three different individual American citizens in as many weeks. First it was Limbaugh, then Rick Santelli the CNBC tea party guy, now Cramer.

Lemme repeat that, The White House with the full weight of the United States government vs. three -guys-. Two of whom aren't even Republicans, they're DemocRat members of the MSM. Is it just me, or are these O-tomatons completely insane whacko batsh1t crazy?

sarge here yall look like ya need some sorta group hug

"According to the new Fox News poll, Obama is more popular than Reagan."

Rush rates a visit from the Secretary of State? Holy crapshoot,Phantom, You're right,except I would call it beyond batsh&t crazy.
Can we get a DNA test to see if the "Zero" is related to Mugabe?
I have just been firmly convinced that lertardism is indeed a mental disease.No wonder they got rid of all the nuthouses(no disrespect to truely disturbed people.They deserve pity,leftards deserve all the scorn we can throw at them)

sarge here agin
Q:
how is rush limpdick (whos viagra was that in his carry on anyway) and the Hindenburg similar like?
A:
theys both flaming nazi gas bags har har har

sarge likes the part about flamin

the letter to the russian leader may be the greatest foreign affairs faux pas since Chamberlin caved to hitler. i'm not kidding. Maybe Kennedy's meeting with khruschev for the first time was close.

Hillary in high level diplomatic negotiations with Rush...snort...I'm sure Hill will be looking for common ground on the fairness doctrine and an acknowledgment of the importance of unicorns to America's future.

Syncro

The O ring is up against reason and common sense, all he and his attack idiots can do is attack, it's a hell of a lot easier than coming up with something that makes sense or actually works.

sarge....and Hitler's rating in 1939 was higher than anybody has ever had.group hug???? That's so 80's.Grow up, or get back into your culvert.

9:28 should be Western Canadian

sarge, for what it's worth, Bush was 80%+ after 9/11. Harry Truman, now considered one of the greatest presidents, had Bush-level poll numbers when he left office. And of course, Churchill was voted out of office in 1945 after basically saving the world. MSM hasn't turned on O yet. But it's coming. Chris Matthews is pi88ed over the earmarks; even Maureen Dowd is pi88ed with Obama. When they realize what moronic dupes they were during the campaign, they're gonna turn on this marxist thug, and turn big time.

Re: Cramer's admitted 6-figure donation to the Dem Party.
This cycle, my biggest surprise was learning how Dem Wall Street was. I had always thought Wall Street was essentially Repub.

But my very biggest surprise is to learn what a genius propaganda artist Obama is. Warren Buffett supported him. And our own investment genius, Prem Watsa, CEO of Fairfax Financial, who had positive returns in 2008, told Diane Francis in a recent interview that "Obama is a free market guy". I'll say that again: Prem Watsa think O is a free market cat!

Are our investment geniuses, idiot savants?

I don't know about the investment geniuses idiocy savant levels, MND, but the politicos of the OWE sure are.
Check out this article:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090306/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_afghanistan

US to invite Iran to conference on Afghanistan.

What idiot in the WH ever named a talk show host/journalist as his public enemy? I guess Girlie Boy reached his breaking point fast and early like your basic 13 year old girl lashing out in the school cafeteria because she was unloved. Years of smarmy media attacks by the lefty MSM on Bush, love him or hate him, he had enough testosterone to pass on those antics. It comes with the territory if you aren't a narcissistic wimp.

Meanwhile the stock market is in meltdown reflecting that not a word out of the Chief Idiot's lips have meaning. Not to mention how much western world capitals are in crisis mode with the US having an idiot in the WH. Well, the poor lefty idiots, pseudo-sarge whose mom makes his bed and cleans out his pizza boxes included, are now stuck with what they wished for.

Well like someone stated a while back, 'Somewhere in Kenya there's a village missing their idiot'.

Obama is attacking Rush for basic reasons. Rush may be inflated but right. Porkulus is starting to get flack from Dems. The enemy is now, him. He was going to go through the budget line by line..well maybe next time. This is the old budget... that I'm not changing. He got arse kicked by Putin, PO'd the British PM for what happened in the Mau Mau Rebellion. He wants the "Fairness Doctrine" He needs an enemy and with Rush you either like him or not. I see only one guy that can take on Rush and it isn't O on his best day.

I've given a lot of presentations - and I admit I'm not elegant at 'em. I use Powerpoint like a crutch. The guy who followed me once had his laptop freeze - no Powerpoint - but he talked smoothly and effortlessly - he had an amazing command of facts, and an ability to present things simply.

It made me realize how a true speaker "speaks"

Sorry - my comments at 10:25 were to illustrate if you don't know what you're doing, Powerpoint, and I suppose a teleprompter can save you!

Why does Obama care about what Rush says? He's a talkshow host... Bush never spoke out against those who said bad things about him. He respected the people's right to say those things about him regardless if they were true or not. (if he really is:)The fact that Obama is even looking to another country to deal with A TALKSHOW HOST is very disturbing.

He's acting very immature about this, "mommy, hes saying bad things about me. Can we shut him up?" (i know thats not exactly it, but it gets the point across).

Why does Obama care about what Rush says? He's a talkshow host... Bush never spoke out against those who said bad things about him. He respected the people's right to say those things about him regardless if they were true or not. (if he really is:)The fact that Obama is even looking to another country to deal with A TALKSHOW HOST is very disturbing.

He's acting very immature about this, "mommy, hes saying bad things about me. Can we shut him up?" (i know thats not exactly it, but it gets the point across).

Erik - exactly. If you know your subject, then you don't need the powerpoint and the overheads. You can talk about your subject because you know it.

Sure, the powerpoint is great - and I always use it in conferences because it provides visual backup for your words (and an international audience might need that)..and also, above all, diagrams, images.

But, you still know your subject. And then, after your paper, you are open to questions.

Obama doesn't know what he's talking about. He's never, ever, written a policy or program. He's never developed one. During his Senate years, his over 100 times of 'voting' only 'present' meant that he himself had no opinion. And he doesn't have an opinion on anything that isn't directly focused on him, his enhancement, his expansion of power.

Obama has no idea about the economy, health care, mortgages - nothing. His policies come from the Democrat Backroom Boys who are inserting a socialist regime as fast as they can. Obama is OK with that because socialism removes power from the middle class and empowers a governing elite. That empowers him as its Sovereign Ruler.

And as a narcissist, he can't handle criticism. He's never been in a position before where he was exposed to criticism. He's always been cocooned within a network - the editor of the Law Review is not the same as the author of an article. A community organizer simply gets people to focus on him and 'obey' him. His time in Senate was nested within the Democrat network. His Chicago time was nested within its political network.

Suddenly, he is viewed as responsible and people are critical of him. This means that he feels enormously vulnerable..he can't control these people who criticize him. And if Obama can't control people, he's traumatized. So, he and his aides are going after any and all who criticize him.

How is Obama going to deal with more grassroots unpopularity? Will he outlaw the Tea Parties or will he ignore them as simply 'not happening'. This refusal to acknowledge reality is another defensive strategy of his narcissism. He'll just ignore them because the only world he can live in is one which he writes and one in which he is in total control.

But more and more people are being critical. I consider him a seriously psychologically damaged person..and wonder how he'll deal with it.

He may heighten his campaign agenda; that's all he's capable of - campaigning. So, he might spend a lot of time campaigning to adoring crowds. He'll probably require more and more of these types of crowds as more criticism of him appears.

And he'll have his team attack anyone who disagrees with him...

Crunchbite - yeah, no kidding. If he is so thin-skinned that he has to formulate a movement to discredit and silence AN ENTERTAINER - we are in for some weird scary times.

Everybody has verbal tics - but Obama has one particular one when he's speaking unscripted - when linking ideas - he really draws out the word "and".

It's super annoying!

We know Rush gets under O's skin,
and Obama did write to Medeved
but people there is something about scrappleface, the links in particular, that tell me the Rush-hit job story is satire...

""According to the new Fox News poll, Obama is more popular than Reagan."

Yup, and less popular than Jimmy Carter....

I can't believe the President of the United States is out to get the Mad Money guy.

The next 4 yrs is going to be more exciting than the gunfight at OK corral.

Just watched CTV News.

There is genial urbane Lloyd Robertson and his ending of the news on the light side. Quoth he, making a quip "Hair apparent", no doubt using Heir apparent as a reference, the annointed one has flecks of gray in his hair.

A burly man pooh poohs such nonsense as it being due to stress etc. Then there is Joy Malbon. Oh well, I lost the thread of it.

They are obsessed- in their quiet laid back way.

Limbaugh/Palin 2012, anyone?

Crunchbit - I believe it was only satire dude - better be satire....

The whole thing would be hilariously funny if it were not so serious. Our economy is in the toilet and Bambi can only think of trashing private citizens.
Rush Limbaugh's speech at CPAC was a wonderful and complete detailing of the conservative mind in America. The O administration knows it and knows Rush is an excellent articulator of not only the conservative virtues but the visceral vices of the left.
He completely energized conservatives ( as opposed to Republicans, who may or may not be conservative as we have seen to our chagrin) with his speech and it was extremely well received.
The hit job on Rush was to diffuse and deflect the impact of that speech.( Remember Sarah ?)
In doing this they show their petty and vicious nature to all things they do not control or believe in. ( Most of the continent do not share their views. If we did not know already, we have come to know they cannot handle money and they have their hands on the control of OURS! )
Those facts are the most glaring of what we face and the controversy over Rush does not diminish our alarm over both. We have allowed a group of spoiled and dangerous children to gain the reins of power and they are now driving the chariot that is America ( and all of North America with her and perhaps the world) OVER A CLIFF.
America will no longer exist as a free market society if this keeps up and at the rate they are going it won't take nearly four years.
They have been working a long time herding us into a box of election fraud and ever democrat victories via ACORN and 'community organizations' that ensure the ballot box is always stuffed with democrat votes.
Votes. Money. Guns. Groceries.
Chavez is leading the way and Obama is following close.

@Me No Dhimmi (9:33 PM):

Surprising? Bay Street largely went Liberal several years ago. Why else would the Conservatives have so much trouble cracking the 416 region?

I particularly enjoyed Kramer's bit about the only two kinds of people who don't have to care about the stock market: tenured professors, and "the broke" as I call them.

Two of his biggest voting blocks.

Thanks for coming out Kramer. You've supported liberal policies that have ruined lives for years. Now that these policies are ruining YOU, you speak up.

Who was that other narcissistic leader with high approval rating and a 'feel good about your self' campaign strategy....a few of decades ago, you know, that great speaker....with the moustache..?

iwestin...how subtle.
I caught the reference to Hitler...but Layton's face came to mind.

"He may heighten his campaign agenda; that's all he's capable of - campaigning. So, he might spend a lot of time campaigning to adoring crowds. He'll probably require more and more of these types of crowds as more criticism of him appears.

And he'll have his team attack anyone who disagrees with him..."
E.T.

Westen and Bluetech, you beat me at it...

I also had visions of a screeching man perched in 1930's Berlin too...Teleprompters did'nt exist back then though.

Jack, well he just looks like a guy in a bad 80's porno.