More al-Reuters fauxtography and disinformation? Shocking! /sarc
I'd be surprised if it were otherwise with this decidedly leftist European MSM organization. As noted in some comments at Pajamas Media, al-Reuters was smart enough to create in their disinformation captions the smidgen of plausible deniability needed in their anti-Semitic and militarily ignorant main market in EUrope.
Some guys in the art dept where I work and I were picking out the obvious PhotoShop artifacts in the Monday, Jan 5th cover photo of the Globe and Mail, (I ran a photo studio for several years and know a few dirty image tricks myself). I wrote the paper about it, but naturally received no reply. The photographer credited on the image has been in hot water before.
I often wonder who is dim enough to read and accept news wire plant pieces...apart from news wire copy being the laziest type of news copy for a broadsheet to publish it has been proven again and again to be the most inaccurate.
Why do MSM editors still subscribe to these defective substandard wire service new products...must be sheer journalistic/editorial lethargy ...wonder if Miller will teach a course in that next semester?
You guys are all wrong. Those are missiles. 'Cause the media said so. You know, those new slow moving trick missiles, designed to look like flares.
Not unlike the trick missiles that Hamas never fired into Israel that weren't built in a university compound.
yeah they are just flyin' back and forth at ground attack level and dropping flares 'cause those flares are pretty. actually, you dive, drop your ordinance and then drop flares as you pull out. standard procedure when you think you might take ground fire. so...one goes with the other. technically correct to say "just having dropped weapons " because they have you can bet, just done that very thing.
Why this blog? Until this moment
I have been forced
to listen while media
and politicians alike
have told me
"what Canadians think".
In all that time they
never once asked.
This is just the voice
of an ordinary Canadian
yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
homepage email Kate (goes to a private
mailserver in Europe)
I can't answer or use every
tip, but all are
appreciated!
"I got so much traffic afteryour post my web host asked meto buy a larger traffic allowance."Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you
send someone traffic,
you send someone TRAFFIC.
My hosting provider thought
I was being DDoSed. -
Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generatedone-fifth of the trafficI normally get from a linkfrom Small Dead Animals."Kathy Shaidle
"Thank you for your link. A wave ofyour Canadian readers came to my blog! Really impressive."Juan Giner -
INNOVATION International Media Consulting Group
I got links from the Weekly Standard,Hot Air and Instapundit yesterday - but SDA was running at least equal to those in visitors clicking through to my blog.Jeff Dobbs
"You may be anasty right winger,but you're not nastyall the time!"Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collectingyour welfare livelihood."Michael E. Zilkowsky
More al-Reuters fauxtography and disinformation? Shocking! /sarc
I'd be surprised if it were otherwise with this decidedly leftist European MSM organization. As noted in some comments at Pajamas Media, al-Reuters was smart enough to create in their disinformation captions the smidgen of plausible deniability needed in their anti-Semitic and militarily ignorant main market in EUrope.
Well curdle my ice-cream cone...
first it was Jesus on toast, now it's "False Profit" written in the sky in Arabic.
Its the flares they're on about? I thought it spelled something rude in Arabic.
How disappointing.
Some guys in the art dept where I work and I were picking out the obvious PhotoShop artifacts in the Monday, Jan 5th cover photo of the Globe and Mail, (I ran a photo studio for several years and know a few dirty image tricks myself). I wrote the paper about it, but naturally received no reply. The photographer credited on the image has been in hot water before.
I think it may say "part your cheeks" in arabic
I often wonder who is dim enough to read and accept news wire plant pieces...apart from news wire copy being the laziest type of news copy for a broadsheet to publish it has been proven again and again to be the most inaccurate.
Why do MSM editors still subscribe to these defective substandard wire service new products...must be sheer journalistic/editorial lethargy ...wonder if Miller will teach a course in that next semester?
cal2 when you interpolate by guess you have to read between the lines.
It actually says.
Bend over and grab your ankles.
This action will automatically spread your cheeks
Tony and Cal2, I was hoping for something like "Yore momma wears army boots", or "Yasser Arafat sleeps with the fishes".
You know, something good. ~:D
However, since its just flares the real meaning is "nyah nyah, you missed me!!!"
You guys are all wrong. Those are missiles. 'Cause the media said so. You know, those new slow moving trick missiles, designed to look like flares.
Not unlike the trick missiles that Hamas never fired into Israel that weren't built in a university compound.
I was going to link to a post that Reuters had posted of mine but it seems they were all deleted since the last one was posted in early December.
It was there then it went away....
There goes what's left of my credibility.
LOL,
Oh this is good news, according to those smoke signals Burger King is bringing back their "Allah in an I Scream", with and without nuts. TM
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/008141.php
You are all wrong, those are new missiles designed by a progressive enlightened leftist,
they do an "interpretive dance" with smoke trails before they hit their target!!!
Gaza has mountains? Who knew?
cbc.ca/world/story/2009/01/03/gaza.html
h/t The Muqata
*
c'mon, you call that media bias?
pshaaaaw... get up on the porch with the big dogs.
i've got one for you... "when is a baby-killer NOT the
most repugnant human being on your agenda?"
*
Translation:
"Going fast; only 23 virgins left. Next?"
Ever since the UN sponsored ethnic cleansing in Kosovo, I look a t all photos with a skeptical tilt to my eyebrows.
yeah they are just flyin' back and forth at ground attack level and dropping flares 'cause those flares are pretty. actually, you dive, drop your ordinance and then drop flares as you pull out. standard procedure when you think you might take ground fire. so...one goes with the other. technically correct to say "just having dropped weapons " because they have you can bet, just done that very thing.
harumph, the IAF drop flares the whole time they are over Gaza airspace, dropping ordinance or not.
I take it you haven't seen the videos of them doing that, eh?