Thank you, George W. Bush, for having the moral clarity and leadership that made possible the liberation of the Iraqi people and the execution of the monster criminal Saddam Hussein.
I watched the BBC's "House of Saddam". I'm not sure if they were sympathetic to Saddam, but they certainly tried to portray him as something more than a tyrant.
but they certainly tried to portray him as something more than a tyrant.
Something they'll never afford President Bush.
God bless GWB's quiet, unperturbed, steady leadership through the ugliest MSM Open Season ever. His liberation of millions from tyranny in the Mideast and disease in Africa will never be reported by them.
Kenneth,
Saddam was part of the 9-11 plot. Look in the 9-11 report. He also was involved in the '93 bombing of the WTC, which he admitted when he tried to trade the mastermind of it for peace. He was behind an attempt to assinate a former US president. I know that you think the above are all lies. But you don't really have any evidence that they are lies, on account of they are true.
BTW,
I have asked many leftards like yourself for examples of Bush lies, in his own words, in context, and never get any.
I can think of a lot of reasons why GWB was a lousy president. For example, he wants to flood the US with cheap, unskilled labor, that only worsens the plight of inner city blacks. He spends like a drunken sailor, could never defend himself effectively in the public arena when faced with a hostile press, etc. But national security and the decision to remove Saddam from the world stage is not one of the reasons that he was a lousy president.
He should have got it in '92!
I'd be a lot more favourably disposed towards the Iraq war if there'd only been one and if they'd done a proper job of it the first time!
Why this blog? Until this moment
I have been forced
to listen while media
and politicians alike
have told me
"what Canadians think".
In all that time they
never once asked.
This is just the voice
of an ordinary Canadian
yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
homepage email Kate (goes to a private
mailserver in Europe)
I can't answer or use every
tip, but all are
appreciated!
"I got so much traffic afteryour post my web host asked meto buy a larger traffic allowance."Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you
send someone traffic,
you send someone TRAFFIC.
My hosting provider thought
I was being DDoSed. -
Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generatedone-fifth of the trafficI normally get from a linkfrom Small Dead Animals."Kathy Shaidle
"Thank you for your link. A wave ofyour Canadian readers came to my blog! Really impressive."Juan Giner -
INNOVATION International Media Consulting Group
I got links from the Weekly Standard,Hot Air and Instapundit yesterday - but SDA was running at least equal to those in visitors clicking through to my blog.Jeff Dobbs
"You may be anasty right winger,but you're not nastyall the time!"Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collectingyour welfare livelihood."Michael E. Zilkowsky
Thank you, George W. Bush, for having the moral clarity and leadership that made possible the liberation of the Iraqi people and the execution of the monster criminal Saddam Hussein.
I watched the BBC's "House of Saddam". I'm not sure if they were sympathetic to Saddam, but they certainly tried to portray him as something more than a tyrant.
but they certainly tried to portray him as something more than a tyrant.
Something they'll never afford President Bush.
God bless GWB's quiet, unperturbed, steady leadership through the ugliest MSM Open Season ever. His liberation of millions from tyranny in the Mideast and disease in Africa will never be reported by them.
He got what he deserved.
Yeah, that sure was worth getting thousands of our citizens killed, and killing hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis.
You Republican shit.
kenny anger , you should always back up your peturbations.
http://icasualties.org/oif/iraqideaths.aspx
Kenneth,
Saddam was part of the 9-11 plot. Look in the 9-11 report. He also was involved in the '93 bombing of the WTC, which he admitted when he tried to trade the mastermind of it for peace. He was behind an attempt to assinate a former US president. I know that you think the above are all lies. But you don't really have any evidence that they are lies, on account of they are true.
BTW,
I have asked many leftards like yourself for examples of Bush lies, in his own words, in context, and never get any.
I can think of a lot of reasons why GWB was a lousy president. For example, he wants to flood the US with cheap, unskilled labor, that only worsens the plight of inner city blacks. He spends like a drunken sailor, could never defend himself effectively in the public arena when faced with a hostile press, etc. But national security and the decision to remove Saddam from the world stage is not one of the reasons that he was a lousy president.
"He got what he deserved."
He should have got it in '92!
I'd be a lot more favourably disposed towards the Iraq war if there'd only been one and if they'd done a proper job of it the first time!
Saddam Hussien WAS the weapon of mass destruction.