In Denmark, a bold experiment;
Because Greenlanders have repeatedly been attacked by Arab and Somali immigrants in the city of Århus, Danish authorities have started an information campaign in local schools and a slide show showing photos from Greenland with comments in Arabic.Greenlanders have been subject to rock throwing, harassment and assaults by Arabs. Residents in the district of Gellerup stay in their flats for most of the day because they fear to go outside. “It baffles me that parents don’t react to this. I complained to a mother in my apartment building after her son had assaulted me, but she slammed the door shut in my face,” says Naasunnguaq, who uses the Inuit word for flower as a nickname because she wants to remain anonymous. She has lived in the neighborhood for 16 years. According to Lars, also from Greenland, Arabs have racist views of Greenlanders: “They cannot understand why we should be allowed to live in Denmark. Even if we try to explain that we are Danes and get [Danish] citizenship by birth, they don’t understand it,” he says.
Watch this story closely. If Muslims can be successfully trained not to attack Greenlanders, then perhaps the knowledge gained can be used to reduce random Muslim violence against Hindus, women, gays, Christians and Jews in other parts of the world.
I just don't get it - how come Arabs and Somalians are Canadian citizens... Have to remember to order a truckload of rocks.
I'm glad you're looking out for gays.
This is just the voice of a homo-positive Canadian yelling back at the radio - "Sven Robinson speaks for me."
You can take the boy out of the closed society but you cant take the closed society out of the boy..or girl....or mother or father....
The aboriginal people of Europe are Europeans. At some point they will decide they dont like the newcomers. The difference between the Europeans vs immingrants and North American aboriginals and Europeans in 1600 is the development levels of the societies.
The more advanced society usually wins....vandals sackng Rome being the potentially relevant exception.
Not because I advocate it but because this is the likely path. Within 10 years you will see
1) Closing of immigration of Muslims to Europe
2) If violence erupts after that you will see expulsions...
The question is which country first
Italy
France
Denmark
Netherlands
Germany
UK
My bet is on italy or france first. The immigration.
Ahh, Moe.
Nice try, troll. No one on here will ever suggest that gay, lesbian or other is deserving of violence because of their lifestyle.
"If Muslims can be successfully trained not to attack Greenlanders..."
I think muslims would have to be trained not to attack others about the same time they're potty trained. Perhaps muslim obedience schools would help.
On the other hand, violence has been bred into them for 1400 years. And they are inculcated daily through the Quran and Hadiths.
Given the latest pack of rabid Muslims that attacked Britain, education and affluence obviously doesn't work either.
The only remedy for any country that hasn't reached a critical number of Muslims within their borders is to end muslim immigration, and closely monitor their mosques and imams.
In the end though, since it is not possible to reform Islam other than by editing out most of the Quran as hate and removing Mohammad as a teacher of hate - Islam and its political arm, sharia, will have to be banned as seditious and an enemy of democracy.
"Arabs have racist views of Greenlanders: “They cannot understand why we should be allowed to live in Denmark. Even if we try to explain that we are Danes and get [Danish] citizenship by birth, they don’t understand it,” he says."
Oh, brother........
Hitchens nails it . .
A jihad against women
Christopher Hitchens, Slate.com
Published: Wednesday, July 04, 2007
Why on earth do people keep saying, "There but for the grace of God ?"? If matters had been very slightly different over the past weekend, the streets of London and the airport check-in area in Glasgow, Scotland, would have been strewn with charred body parts. And this would have been, according to the would-be perpetrators, because of the grace of God. Whatever our own private theology or theodicy, we might at least agree to take this vile belief seriously.
Instead, almost every other conceivable explanation was canvassed. The June 30 New York Times report managed to quote three people, one of whom attributed the aborted atrocity in London to Tony Blair's foreign policy; one of whom (a New Zealand diplomat, at that) felt "surprisingly all right about it"; and one of whom, described as "a Briton of Indian descent," was worried that "if I walk up that road, they're going to suspect me."
The "they" in this sentence was clearly the British authorities, rather than the Muslim gangsters who have declared open season on all Hindus as well as all Jews, Christians, secularists and other kuffar, or infidel filth.
On the following day, July 1, the same newspaper informed us that Britain contained a "disenfranchised South Asian population." How this was true was never explained. There are several Muslim parliamentarians in both houses, often allowed to make the most absurdly inflammatory and euphemistic statements where acts of criminal violence are concerned, as well as several districts in which the Islamic vote keeps candidates of all parties uneasily aware of what may and may not be said. True, the Muslim extremist groups boycott elections and denounce democracy itself as profane, but this does not really count as disenfranchisement.
Only at the tail end of the coverage was it admitted that a car bomb might have been parked outside a club in Piccadilly because it was "ladies night" and that this explosion might have been designed to lure people into the street, the better to be burned and shredded by the succeeding explosion from the second car-borne cargo of gasoline and nails. We have known since 2004 that a near-identical attack on a club called the Ministry of Sound was proposed in just these terms -- on the grounds that dead "slags" or "sluts" would be regretted by nobody. And so a certain amount of trouble might have been saved by assuming the obvious. The murderers did not just want body parts in general but female body parts in particular.
I suppose that some people might want to shy away from this conclusion for whatever reason, but they cannot have been among the viewers of British Channel 4's recent Undercover Mosque, or among those who watched Sunday's report from Christiane Amanpour on CNN's Special Investigations Unit. On these shows, the British Muslim fanatics came right out with their program. Straight into the camera, leading figures like Anjem Choudary spoke of their love for Osama bin Laden and their explicit rejection of any definition of Islam as a religion of peace. On tape or in person, mullahs in prominent British mosques called for the killing of Indians and Jews.
Liberal reluctance to confront this sheer horror is the result, I think, of a deep reticence about some furtive concept of "race." It is subconsciously assumed that a critique of political Islam is an attack on people with brown skins. One notes in passing that any such concession implicitly denies or negates Islam's claim to be a universal religion. Indeed, some of its own exponents certainly do speak as if they think of it as a tribal property.
And, at any rate, in practice, so it is. The fascistic subculture that has taken root in Britain and that lives by violence and hatred is composed of two main elements. One is a refugee phenomenon, made up of shady exiles from the Middle East and Asia who are exploiting London's traditional hospitality, and one is the projection of an immigrant group that has its origins in a particularly backward and reactionary part of Pakistan.
To the shame-faced white-liberal refusal to confront these facts, one might counterpose a few observations. The first is that we were warned for years of the danger, by Britons also of Asian descent such as Hanif Kureishi, Monica Ali, and Salman Rushdie. They knew what the village mullahs looked like and sounded like, and they said as much.
Not long ago, I was introduced to Nadeem Aslam, whose book Maps for Lost Lovers is highly recommended. He understands the awful price of arranged marriages, dowry, veiling and the other means by which the feudal arrangements of rural Pakistan have been transplanted to parts of London and Yorkshire.
"In some families in my street," he writes to me, "the grandparents, parents, and the children are all first cousins -- it's been going on for generations and so the effects of the inbreeding are quite pronounced by now."
By his estimate and others, a minority of no more than 11% is responsible for more than 70% of the birth defects in Yorkshire. When a leading socialist Member of Parliament, Ann Cryer, drew attention to this appalling state of affairs in her own constituency, she was promptly accused of -- well, you can guess what she was accused of. The dumb word Islamophobia, uncritically employed by Christiane Amanpour in her otherwise powerful documentary, was the least of it. Meanwhile, an extreme, self-destructive clannishness, which is itself "phobic" in respect to all outsiders, becomes the constituency for the preachings of a cult of death. I mention this because, if there is an "ethnic" dimension to the Islamist question, then in this case at least it is the responsibility of the Islamists themselves.
The most noticeable thing about all theocracies is their sexual repression and their directly related determination to exert absolute control over women. In Britain, in the 21st century, there are now honour killings, forced marriages, clerically mandated wife-beatings, incest in all but name and the adoption of apparel for females that one cannot be sure is chosen by them but which is claimed as an issue of (of all things) free expression.
This would be bad enough on its own and if it were confined to the Muslim "community" alone. But, of course, such a toxin cannot be confined, and the votaries of theocracy now claim the God-given right to slaughter females at random for nothing more than their perceived immodesty. The least we can do, confronted by such radical evil, is to look it in the eye (something it strives to avoid) and call it by its right name. For a start, it is the female victims of this tyranny who are "disenfranchised," while something rather worse than "disenfranchisement" awaits those who dare to disagree.
© National Post 2007
http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/is...4d-ea182f2dcb11
Leave it to a moonbat to somehow find anything to suit his agenda when it comes to defending all people from the thuggery of the radical islamist. Hate to burst your bubble leftard, but it certainly is not the "religion of peace". I have never once heard anyone on the right propose to beat gays, or anyone else who disagrees with us. But it is A-OK for a certain group of thugs/criminals/religious extremists to attack non-believers/mutilate and beat females/attack and destroy religious sites/have their children detonate and be used as human shields. Take the blinders off moron, you are cheering for the wrong side!
Can the Danes in Greenland not fight back? What are they wimps? If they refuse to fight back that is a sure sign that the Muslims will eventually rule the western world. No?
"Watch this story closely. If ARABS AND SOMALIS can be successfully trained not to attack Greenlanders, then perhaps the knowledge gained can be used to reduce random ARABS AND SOMALI violence against Hindus, women, gays, Christians and Jews in other parts of the world."
Fixed :-)
"Several of the Greenlanders have problems with finding a place to live in other parts of the town, but the Århus municipality will try to accommodate those wishing to move to other apartments in order to escape the racist violence."
What's wrong with that picture? How about booting the damn Muslim troublemakers out of their public housing. Better yet, boot them out of the country.
Stephen, vandals sacking Rome as a "relevent exception" should not to be ignored. Rome would have sunk faster if their elites had in mass imported the barbarians, accomodated them, and muzzled Romans with pc laws. PM Brown stated after this latest horror in the UK not to use "Muslim" with the word "terrorist". How's that for accomodating barbarians. It seems to me that the Brits are far more degraded than the Roman empire.
Native populations in the EU have to fight their own elites, then, the barbarians without weapons, a police force or military at their disposal, nor a sympathetic press. The odds aren't stacked in their favor.
Yes, Kingstonlad, and those same moonbats would find out in short order how dangerous these folks are, if they lived in a Islamofascist society.
It's so ironic to hear from the likes of Jack Layton, who supposedly champion human rights for women, gays and so on, yet bleat on about the mission in Afghanistan failing. You know, the mission he was against from the start, that he has sought to undermine from day one.
Right now Layton is holding a press conference to explain mission "failures." IOW, he and his ilk (appeasers of terror) who seek to deny any reasonable means of succes there, then hypocritically howl about failure.
I guess it's OK, Mr Layton and your fellow moonbats, to look the other way as girls are mutilated, women are placed on lower order than dogs, and human rights are simply nonexistent; but God help anyone who criticizes this or that "human right" in Canada. I studied this phenomenon in university and it was considered racist then, and it is now. How ironic, eh moonbats?
Stated agenda of a Muslim minority:
** To damage, destroy and ruin the smooth humming machinery of free enterprise democratic peoples.**
The minimum sane measures to limit that destructive agenda:
========================
[1] Arabic speaking Agents for Canadian citizenry to attend all Mosques and Muslim organizations and report to the RCMP and Csis.
[2] The absolute prohibition of any veil, mask or face covering that conceals identity while outside of one*s home residence.
[Policy points [3 to 300] later.]
Public safety is a basic duty of government.
Any leftist outcry about racial profiling and human rights is groundless.
The aims of the Muslim terrorist minority have been publicly declared from Acmahdinejad through bin Laden and on down through numerous mad mullah chieftans.
The aims and policy are clear and public, not imaginary.
There is no shame in taking reasonable and concrete measures to ensure public security in North America.
Time to set political correctness aside. = TG
I think what irks me the most about this kind of thing is that you KNOW some imbecile Leftist is going to come on here and call us all racists no matter what.
If you say society can't tolerate immigrants who throw rocks at the natives, you're a racist.
If you say Natives should try to adapt to the new immigrants, you're a racist.
If you object to armed gangs blocking a highway you're a racist.
If you object to immigrant doctors trying to blow up London, you're a racist.
So here's my racist suggestion. Maybe the Danish authorities should arrest all rock throwers regardless of race, colour, creed and what have you, toss them in the can for six months and see if that makes an impression on the sons of b-tches. Maybe wring some useful work out of 'em while they are in jail too.
If all the rock throwers end up being Muslim immigrants, so what? They'll learn rock throwing leads to six months hard labor, which sucks. They will tell their friends. Soon there will be no more immigrants who think rock throwing is a good idea, and it'll stop.
Muslims are no dumber than anybody else. Give 'em an inch and they take a mile, basic human nature. Conversely, smack them hard when they offend and they'll -stop- offending.
Let the shrieks of racism begin. G'head, I can take it. Morons.
when the leftoids have no case, no logical argument, no counterpoint to facts, they always revert back to the "you are a racist" line because they feel obligated to have some words come out of their piehole but can't admit they are wrong.
Simply simplistic.
For those of you who find the previous comment unclear in any way.
Legislation should be passed promptly to authorize widespread use of video cameras in all North American cities and towns just as in the UK.
Legislation should be passed to prohibit any concealment of one*s face in public especially with burkahs or bandannas over the face during demonstrations or marches.
Only criminals, Jihadists and graffitti paint bombers protest public video cameras.= TG
"Any leftist outcry about racial profiling and human rights is groundless."
Well the first question to answer would be when did islam become a race.....
If I were in the UK I wouldnt care about what Gordon Brown says, I would care what he does.
Yeah yeah we all know....broad strat of society, bad apples, dont equate....ok now that its out of your system do what you need to do.
This is turning into a fascinating story. Non oppressed well educated group of doctors.
Be curious what the wifey knew and when she knew it. Remember the group here where the wives were the worst of the bunch, "if he doesnt do something jihadist I'll divorce him."
who says hijabbed women are oppressed? The ones who do cover by choice are likely the most radical, see those carazzzeee Khadr's and those women in Iran who were directing the police to ticket women wearing makeup and not fully covered.
Dont assume Muslim women want to throw off the hijab. Some find power in it, and those that do are a real problem. It reinforces the power of the pious.....she knows the radical men will support and listen to the "pious woman"
This is a different threat. The soviet Union didnt want their people to leave.....the radical islamis encoourage immigration. Different enemy, different tactics.
As hitchens said, how different would the conversation be today if the good doctors had been successful? Thank goodness they werent.
But it will happen again....others will learn from the mistakes and it will be tried again. This is the middle of the beginning.
A "racist" is a conservative who's winning an argument with a liberal.
Rock throwing is illegal.
Immigrants have no right to stay if they are acting illigaly.
Deport immigrant lawbreakers.
Simple.
If the values of immigrants do not match the values of native-born citizens, do not let them in.
Simple.
If immigrants demand that we kowtow to them, deport them.
Simple.
Of those who are not immigrants, jail is unpleasant. Make it more so. Make inmates work for their dinners with hard labour. Less criminals will wish to be there.
Simple.
Terrorists should be hung. If not hung, put in labour camps for life without parole.
Simple.
The rights of law-abiding citizens outweigh the rights of criminals. Period.
Simple.
A muslim cab driver does not have many enough hands to drive his car in less than two lanes at a time while he is shaving his face. But he has many enough hands to flip a bird at me when I use my honk to remind him of his presence in traffic on Toronto street.
Now call me racist.
I am a racist.
Because I don't see any white cab drivers doing the same.
The muslim can't control their cars - this is an established fact. They don't even attempt, because perfection is something that only Allah can achieve. So they do not even try.
Islam is incompatible with Western society and there should be no muslim here for that single reason - they don't give a rats ass if their actions screw someone else, be it driving or anything else.
I trusted a muslim to fix my car and paid for that with wasted time, money and frustration, before another muslim man explained that concept to me. They principally don't want to make anything good quality. In-com-pa-tible is the word.
Apparently Muslims now make up 4% of Denmark's population. But this model minority group has made greatly outsized contributions to the formerly lily-white nation's multicultural mosaic, for example making up more than half of it's incarcerated criminals and welfare recipients. Without these diligent Muslims, Denmark would be awash with legions of unemployed prison guards, parole officers, social workers, etc. All hail Islamic Scandinavia!
Aaron,
Isnt that just called lazy? No matter how they dress it up?
"“They cannot understand why we should be allowed to live in Denmark."
This quote from a Greenlander neatly sums up the Muslim mindset. Oh please, don't let the door hit them on their way out returning to Jihadi land.
I first thought that this was a "fill in something else for Greenlander" type of things but unfortunately, it is something all too real.
Add to the mix the reports out of Great Britain of gag orders not to refer to the terrorists as terrorists or Muslim and you can see that the buggers are starting to win, thanks in part,
to the PC moonbats.
There is never a good crusade when you need one.
years ago, in a previous life, I was a teacher in a remote Inuk village. One year a group of teachers and villagers took an Easter vacation in Bahamas.
The Inuks were treated like shit by the Bahamians. Refused service in restaurants, refused service by taxis, having people spit on them walking down the street. 100% racist.
It's everywhere.
"If Muslims can be successfully trained not to attack Greenlanders,......"
What are you thinking? Shock collars?
LLOOLOOLOOLOOLOOOLOOOO!!!
BBZZZZZZTT!
DOWN! Put the rock DOWN!
No, I disagree that they are lazy. That blanket statement cannot be true, as there are millions or even billions of hard working muslim. They are not afraid to get hands dirty working long hours. It's the perfection that they are not trying to achieve.
"the grandparents, parents, and the children are all first cousins -- it's been going on for generations and so the effects of the inbreeding are quite pronounced by now."
Wasn't IQ the topic on a related post, 70 being retarded?
But of course, there are two problems in dealing with the religion of savagery - the first problem is the leftards (from ghost of a flea):
An important part of our current cognitive dissonance is a media adhering to a fatuous notion of objectivity. They believe it is somehow objective to produce an opposing opinion - no matter how deranged - to any given point of view. This is part and parcel of a postmodernism and a left ceded to a relativism that Marx himself opposed with every word he ever wrote.
Try telling people today that Osama bin Laden was not a CIA agent and you will hear a high pitched whine in reply: "But how do you know?" All oblivious to the notion it is their claim which needs to be supported and not my job to refute every evil thought-fart wafted in my direction. Not all opinions are valid and not all opinions deserve an airing on the floor. I was in Kensington Market in downtown Toronto where I was exposed to a (National) Socialist Worker vendor peddling conspiracy theories to the soft-headed. It took a great deal of restraint to leave that sorry spectacle in progress. I imagine many reasonable Germans felt the same way passing crackpot Brown Shirts in the '20s. They lived to regret it. We shall too.
* Though I should note Hitchens does not quite answer the question as to why it took the most religious country in the West to recognize the danger we now face. The answer, of course, is it takes a believer both to recognize the enemy's proclamations of faith to be evil and to be sincere. Our elites protest these doctors and engineers and sons of billionaires are impoverished and marginalized even as the butcher's knife is drawn across their throats.
You get what you pay for.
"Wasn't IQ the topic on a related post, 70 being retarded?"
Yes. 70 is also the IQ at which one reads an article about race based crime and concludes it has anything to do with religion.
"If Muslims can be successfully trained not to attack Greenlanders, then perhaps the knowledge gained can be used to reduce random Muslim violence against Hindus, women, gays, Christians and Jews in other parts of the world."
LOLOL. The best tongue-in-cheek comment I have read for quite some time.
SIGH....sorry guys/gals. PC'ness will let it's own nation and people die before it wakes up.It is happening in Eurostan, and over here. All I can say is that the first SOB from Islamofascist land who throws a rock a me will be in for one big surprise. He/she will not remember what happened.
Police have named the driver of the failed terrorist attack at Glasgow Airport
He has been named as Singed Majeep
They also belive that he was celebrating the Muslim Festival of RAMAVAN...
"Yes. 70 is also the IQ at which one reads an article about race based crime and concludes it has anything to do with religion."
So, you're saying Hitchens has an IQ of 70?
Or, which came first the 'religion' or the inbreeding?
I think the best way to train moslems involve deportation, billy clubs and rubber bullets.
If you get enough of those mutts in one place then you can use bunker bombs and daisy cutters.
Jim, you wouldn't by chance be some kind of rabble/babble jerkweed would you? Genocide is a Lefty thing.
"If Muslims can be successfully trained not to attack Greenlanders, then perhaps the knowledge gained can be used "
Now if we can successfully train them to play hockey and attack the opposite team...well then you may have something....Frank Shiro call your office.
Fred: "He has been named as Singed Majeep
They also belive that he was celebrating the Muslim Festival of RAMAVAN."
HA!
Almost had me going till the Ramavan part...
Training Muslims? To do what?
Act like civilized people I assume.
Good luck with that!
After all the talk of billy clubs, rubber bullets and mass deportation I wonder if anyone has thought of conversion. Islam is a belief system that individuals freely choose to follow. Yes there is family and peer pressure but the fact remains that no Muslim is forced to throw stones at Greenlanders. Conversion is possible. I know and have ministered to the daughter of the Imam in the oldest mosque in Western Canada. She is now a Christian amd is actively seeking to bring her family to Christ dispite the fact that she is banned from her family and under a potential death sentence. Let's not get into the habit of dehumanising people because of their belief system. Let's give them a better belief system.
Dunno OMMAG, normal people usually respond to negative feedback pretty quick. A swift kick is better than 20 hours of sensitivity training.
And really, we don't have to civilize them. All we have to do is tell them the rules, and get them to understand We Mean It. That way we can avoid the whole Yugoslavia experience, with the ethnic cleansing and the mass graves and what have you.
Unfortunately, right now the message being delivered by our gummint and the Euroweenie one is "We Mean It... Psych! Just Kidding."
Which inevitably leads to mass graves for somebody. Jury is still out on who's going to get buried.
It might be time to review this:
"Ode to Violence
Violence has always gotten a bad rap. That's because people just don't understand it. First of all, regardless of what people tell you, violence solves problems. Actually, violence, taken to certain extents, can solve any problem. Is someone annoying you with their idiotic opinion? Beat the hell out of 'em. Don't know the answer to a math problem? Pistol whip your teacher until he gives it to you. Having trouble understanding tax forms? Firebomb the I.R.S. headquarters. War and famine exist on earth? Nothing that can't be solved by nukes, nukes, and more nukes. See, how can someone be against something with so many practical uses?"
Read the whole thing.
http://www.imao.us/docs/Violence.htm
one can't be a rasist for being anti muslim. islam is not a race. i'm sick of these perverted a** holes and their backward religion, sick, sick sick. there is no way anyone can have any argument to support this vile religion. we will have to fight physically not verbally to rid ourselves of the vermin who follow mohammed.
It is re-assuring to know that the white man doesn't have the monopoly on racism...oops can't say that it's racist.
Eventually, as I see it, there will be race wars breaking out in Europe then in North America unless there is another terrorist attack on the continental USA.
Apeease, compromise all that one may. Soon the only thing left to compromise is your soul...
While Islam is not a race, it is a mental disorder. Anyone who since birth has been indoctrinated in this vile, inhumane cult suffers from a certain degree of mental illness.
Just like being tortured by the Japanese, Nazi's, and North Vietnamese led to terrible psychological scar for the victim. So would the non-stop psychological indoctrination of "True Islam" lead to some mental deficits as this cult is so out of touch with reality that it is hard to reconcile for most people.
So the only way to survive the continual psychological onslaught of Islam is to mentally break down. A bizarre kind of "Stockholm Syndrome" if you will.
You can't reason with such unreasonableness, you can only contain it and remove it for the safety of the larger society. As such, Mosques should be closed and radical Imams removed from the country, as well as anyone who will not integrate into the civilized society in which they now live.
Well said canadian infidel.
Islam is a vile social virus that the west needs inoculation from, rather than inculcation.
Genocide is indeed a lefty trait. Other lower primates will do it too, as President Imadinnerjacket in Iran will attest. He has spent the last 20 years poaching Iraqies, openly talks about wiping Isreal off the face of the earth, and is threatening the west with nukes that he doesn't even have yet.
In addition, you blathering turd brain, I said nothing about genocide. I am talking about a few well placed conventional weapons to make an impression on our cave dwelling mud flaps. Fuel/air weapons are good too, there is more than one way to skin an ape.
Rabble? I got booted off their forum in less time than it takes Kate to do the 1/4 mile on that lightning fast bike of hers. So no, to answer your question, I am a normally aspirated, chrome plated, weapons grade right wing muscle machine.
Trifle with me at your risk!
;)
Muslim lands have no economy other that trading a bit amongst each other. Islam is based on the premise of conquest and occupation. It plundered and enslaved it's conquests to do it's bidding. Muslims have never "Created" anything, they stole what they could use and destroyed anything they came across that didn't fit their narrow view of the world.
There is no literary history in the Islamic world say for what they stole, The only architectural achievements are in building mosques, which they had someone else design and build.
There are no economies in the middle-east except for oil, which now allows them to bring their Jihad to a much more sophisticated and developed western world, (ie, we're paying for our own destruction). Islam is based on deceit, thievery, manipulation and corruption.
If you think these are values we should import into our population, I have some virgins I'd like you to meet.
We are being led to our own destruction, at the hands of "Liberal" thinkers and socialist demagogs who are all to willing to sell out to the radicals in the hopes that they(lefties) will retain some power. They will be sorely disappointed when they find their heads will be the first on the chopping block.
Not true. In the ancient world, there was a time when moslem countries were at the cutting edge of the maths, sciences and technology.
For some reason all that collapsed and they have become a religion of racists, bigots and superstitious idiots. They pretty much reject any authority outside the mosque. If you put an idiot in the mosque, as they are prone to do...you get asnine behaviour out of them.
Political correctness is not the answer to the moslem problem.
Irwin, as always, bravo. There is no retraining for religious adherents that can produce individuals that practice medicine by day and assemble bombs for death and disfigurement at night. Maybe it's because I'm a nurse that I've been stuck on that all week. It's as vile as any Dr. Mengele served up with the Third Reich.