One of these is not like the other.
"If a practising scientist selected a 1987 data set over more recent versions, failed to cite it correctly, altered the appearance of the data without a clear explanation and didn’t include the data from the last 20 years then I think we’d all be asking serious questions about their professionalism."
Read the whole thing - or as much as you still can. Note at the end that the IPCC forced the deletion of the embarrassing content.
More detailed discussion of Briffa.
"Ok everyone, what do we need to cut out of this graph to fit our theory? Briffa post 1960? Make it happen. What? No no no, no need to worry about scientific method. We are after more grant money here, not something as blase as the truth."
Mann, IPCC, Gore, Strong, Kyoto.
Ever get the feeling this may be leading to 'The Mother Of All Lawsuits ??
The needless fear being instilled in our public school students could be one of many claims, IMO.
Nothing like skewing data sets when they are "INCONVENIENT TRUTHS".
Isn't that right Goracle?
Science as predetermined outcomes.
And now for an introduction to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle.
It's a good thing Prime Minister Stephen Harper has alloted $9.2 billion in Science & Tech funding so we can get away from this patent idiocy.
Cheers :)
Hans-Christian Georg Rupprecht BGS, PDP, CFP
Commander in Chief
Frankenstein Battalion
Knecht Rupprecht Division
Hans Corps
1st Saint Nicolaas Army
Army Group “True North”
Nothing like lies and propaganda to further your left-wing agendas.
Scum. There day will come.
It's not science it's politics...waddaya expet from politicians with a science degree?
It's not science it's politics...waddaya expect from politicians with a science degree?
Hello Darkness My Old Friend,
The Goreacle Says the World Will End...
I was polled by environics yesterday and it went something like this:
Poller: How worried are you about environmental issues?
Me: Not at all worried, I was outside earlier today and the Earth looked just fine to me.
Poller: What is the most important environmental benefit to having government designated green space around Ontario's Golden Horseshoe?
Me: No benefit.
Poller: We can't except that as an answer!
Me: If you already know the answers why are you asking me these questions?
[ The world will end in 2060, according to Newton.
Luckily for modern scientists in awe of his achievements, Newton based this figure on religion rather than reasoning.
In a letter from 1704 which has gone on show in Jerusalem's Hebrew University, Newton uses the Bible's Book of Daniel to calculate the date for the Apocalypse. ]thisislondon.co.uk
//www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23401099-details/The+world+will+end+in+2060%2C+according+to+Newton/article.do
So, ya see, 'Big Al' you are nothing new. The world has already been forcast(TWN) to end ---- many times already :)
Only difference now is the Prophets do not use a Bible, they use a Brible ----- falsified data and carbon-credits.
Hehe ... I like the squabbling in the comments that follow his post!
Some of the products of our liberalised educational system are just priceless.
The deletion of the data is very strange, especially since the other data sources support the authors' model quite well. I have read literally hundreds of scientific papers during my career as a geologist and invariably, the approach to discordant data has been to report it and then attempt to explain why it doesn't undermine the model proposed. It is even more unconventional to report part of a data set, but not the whole of it. Either the data is credible, in which case you must include all of it and explain the discordance or it is poor data and you don't include any of it.
Anyody else fall asleep while trying to read this post? From what I did manage to digest, I'd say that some scientists get their data the same way politicians do. Eenie, meenie, minie...
BTW Hans, I much prefer the Robertson-Schrödinger relation to Heisenberg. ;-)
and for more fun, read the June 18th entry that links the Nifong fiasco with the same kind of fraud that promotes global warming.
I especially like the line where Dr. Mann, father of the infamous Hockey Stick, now sends his lawyer to answer Congressional questions . . . . if ya can't take the heat, take yourself out of the global warming Kyoto ponzi scheme.
http://www.climateaudit.org/
Texas Canuck:
Yes and where did Schrödinger's cat get to anyway?
Do you get Niels "Bohr'ed" by quantum mechanics?
I am still defending against those vicious Danes, exhibiting Viking tendencies, trying to invade Hans Island!!
I am in the midst of finding them an orthogonal world per the Copenhagen interpretation!
Cheers :)
Hans-Christian Georg Rupprecht BGS, PDP, CFP
Commander in Chief
Frankenstein Battalion
Knecht Rupprecht Division
Hans Corps
1st Saint Nicolaas Army
Army Group “True North”
Waiting for the day when all of these weasels get charged with the biggest fraud in history and are prosecuted and convicted accordingly.
Ron in kelowna,
Just read a book by Frank J. Tipler, professor of mathematical physics at Tulane University and he claims that many phycisists also believe the world is going to end around the same time as Newton (2050), due to a combination of events including a singularity in space/time.
Texas Canuck, will you wake up when Gore and the boys come to take away your lifestyle. The 'stick' underpins their whole warming calamity claim :)
Then of course, there's this:
http://www.weatheroffice.gc.ca/saisons/image_e.html?img=sfe1t_s
let's raise the level of discourse. liar, liar pants on fire.
And then Steve McIntyre says this:
Does your work disprove global warming?
We have not made such a claim.
Cherry pick all you want Kate.
So environment Canada is correct 49% of the time in its 3 month forecasts.....which is why I get the farmer's almanac. Same level of accuracy. For winter cold predictions I check the size of my neighbour's woodpile.
There is no scientific project immune from climate change
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6768821.stm
For Professor Paul Tyler, a marine biologist, the expedition is a chance to establish a baseline of data about this undersea world - so the effects of climate change can be assessed.
Climate change will impact even remote ecosystems
"We've seen signs of change at the surface and in other parts of the deep ocean at 5,000m; so we need to see what's changing here.
"There is nowhere on the planet that is immune from climate change."
And more about the fraudulent Mann hockey stick graph here:
http://tinyurl.com/2wsy9s
All in a Good Cause
By Orson Scott Card March 4, 2007; First appeared in print in The Rhinoceros Times, Greensboro, NC
Kinda makes one wonder just what's included ( as in deleted ) , from previous IPPC reports and summaries . Nothing like making the crime fit the punishment .
Sorry , IPCC , of course .
That graf kind of reminds you of the opening to THE OUTER LIMETS. THERES NOTHING WRONG WITH YOUR TELEVIOSION SET WE ARE CONTROLING TRANSMITION WE WILL CONTROL THE HORIZONTAL WE WILL CONTROL THE VERTICAL WE CALL ROLL THE PICTURE IF YOU LIKE WE CAN BROING UP THE VOLUME OR TUNE IT TO A WHISPER WE CAN TUNE IP TO A SOFT BLUR OR SHARPEN IT TO CRYSTAL CLARITY FOR THE NEXT 60 MINUTES WE WILL TAKE YOU FROM THE INTER MOST MIND TO THE OUTER LIMETS
Way to go Buglady Ya can't get much more scientific than that.Probably more accurate than cbc fer sure.Beautiful out here on the east coast taday.
If any of this is true why is David Suzuki able to make the statement that of 958 peer reviewed articles published in major science journals over the last 5 years not one article disputed the human impact on global warming?