OoohhhOooohhh...where do I sign up? Having bigger tits might make me a better man. Oh wait. Sorry Kate.
So having breast implants for 10 grand,instead of buying,oh,milk,diapers,food,books,etc for her kids makes her feel good? Two more kids,unfortunately,destined for the welfare rolls.
Posted by northbankbar on 17 Jun 2007 10:58
re: re: Did you know the world's tallest tower is in Canada? ...
-----
Why is the weather always so nice in Toronto. Not a cloud in the sky!
That's because the CBC hasn't retouched the photo to make it look like smog, northbankbar!
hate to take away from Toronto[not really] but they no longer have the biggest pole around.Abu Dhabi wins that honour and theirs is much beefier.it's usually called a building.
I guess it is a matter of priorities. If that single mother might want to work in a thong, on a stage with a pole then the operation might be considered a necessary business decision. The same goes with reconstructive surgery after an accident or disease, however, giving Pamela Andersons to unemployed single mothers to make them feel better is a load of socialist crap.
Bah!! That photo was obviously all doctored up. IT was taken with the latest special effects lens which makes very large objects in the background appear much smaller, and rather small objects in the foreground appear very much larger. So you can all stop drooling or speculating as the case may be. :-))
Not only, texas canuck, is it a load of socialist crap, but it isn't a 'gift'. We, the taxpayer, are presumably paying for this surgery in Britain.
Strange, isn't it, how the feminists campaigned violently and viciously that 'women are not objects'; and ranted again and again that 'women are not sexual objects' - and the first thing that 'free women' often do, is not find a job, not take responsibility for their lives no matter what happens. But, remodel their bodies into sexual objects.
So, it's breast augmentation - which has nothing to do with a baby's needs - and probably disables those breasts as such - but has one agenda only. To make that woman a 'sexual objects'. I haven't heard any feminists opposed to this. Instead, the verbiage is 'well, it will make her 'feel' better about herself'. As a sexual object.
What about looking after her children, putting that money into an education account; not expecting the taxpayer to fork up the money; what about some education for herself; or, a down payment on a small flat. Wouldn't those make her 'feel better about herself'? No? Is it only being a 'sexual object' that does the trick?
But - the feminists ranted and raged against men, for 'making women into sexual objects'. And now, women are busily spending millions every year - on just that agenda. Hmmm.
c.j.g. said:
"hate to take away from Toronto[not really] but they no longer have the biggest pole around.Abu Dhabi wins that honour and theirs is much beefier.it's usually called a building."
Ok... so Dhabi has the tallest tower, but if the subject closest to the camera were to fall over backwards Toronto would immediately become the site of the highest mountains east of the Rockies.
Oh, geez. If you want see young women with such over-proportions in the Toronto area, visit Canada's Wonderland any Friday evening. You will find plenty.
But, truth be told, I have sympathy for the woman pictured. In the flush of youth, her voluptuous figure may indeed attract men. But, should she choose a mate, there's a good chance that ten or fifteen years on, those currently enticing breasts will be, as Marlon Brando put it in "Last Tango in Paris", used for playing soccer. She will probably suffer back problems, find it hard to find bras and clothes to fit her, and still constantly be subject to lewd remarks, as if large breasts equal loose morals.
My best friend suffered from the same syndrome in some way; he was very smart, but also very good looking. He could pick up girls with a smile, but I remember him saying "Yeah, but all they're interested in is the pretty face." He wanted to have a real relationship, but most girls couldn't get past the physical (as in the "show off" to their girlfriends who has the cutest boyfriend.)
Hey I recognize that girl from the Sun calandar but there it says she's a "dental hygenist" who some times acts and runs her own entertainment company?
for those interested and just to show i don't know the difference between Abu Dhabi and Dubai.[www.burjdubai.com].this structure is slated to top out at 2600 feet.
Why this blog? Until this moment
I have been forced
to listen while media
and politicians alike
have told me
"what Canadians think".
In all that time they
never once asked.
This is just the voice
of an ordinary Canadian
yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
homepage email Kate (goes to a private
mailserver in Europe)
I can't answer or use every
tip, but all are
appreciated!
"I got so much traffic afteryour post my web host asked meto buy a larger traffic allowance."Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you
send someone traffic,
you send someone TRAFFIC.
My hosting provider thought
I was being DDoSed. -
Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generatedone-fifth of the trafficI normally get from a linkfrom Small Dead Animals."Kathy Shaidle
"Thank you for your link. A wave ofyour Canadian readers came to my blog! Really impressive."Juan Giner -
INNOVATION International Media Consulting Group
I got links from the Weekly Standard,Hot Air and Instapundit yesterday - but SDA was running at least equal to those in visitors clicking through to my blog.Jeff Dobbs
"You may be anasty right winger,but you're not nastyall the time!"Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collectingyour welfare livelihood."Michael E. Zilkowsky
OoohhhOooohhh...where do I sign up? Having bigger tits might make me a better man. Oh wait. Sorry Kate.
So having breast implants for 10 grand,instead of buying,oh,milk,diapers,food,books,etc for her kids makes her feel good? Two more kids,unfortunately,destined for the welfare rolls.
I assume that picture of the CN Tower is a small token of appreciation going out to fathers everywhere on Father's Day. ;>)
Personally, I prefer smaller Ta-Ta's.
Does that help curb the drain on the welfare system?
I believe Jesus is about to weep again.
From the UK football link:
Posted by northbankbar on 17 Jun 2007 10:58
re: re: Did you know the world's tallest tower is in Canada? ...
-----
Why is the weather always so nice in Toronto. Not a cloud in the sky!
That's because the CBC hasn't retouched the photo to make it look like smog, northbankbar!
The article said "for a greatly reduced rate", not 10,000 bucks. It should be on the National health, then it'd be free.
All plastic/cosmetic surgery should be free, here as well as Britain, our Mother country, and thus arbiter of all that is right and good.
How else are we going to have a society of beautiful people?
btw, the young lady in front of our national pride, the CN Tower, requires breast reduction, ASAP.
hate to take away from Toronto[not really] but they no longer have the biggest pole around.Abu Dhabi wins that honour and theirs is much beefier.it's usually called a building.
I guess it is a matter of priorities. If that single mother might want to work in a thong, on a stage with a pole then the operation might be considered a necessary business decision. The same goes with reconstructive surgery after an accident or disease, however, giving Pamela Andersons to unemployed single mothers to make them feel better is a load of socialist crap.
Bah!! That photo was obviously all doctored up. IT was taken with the latest special effects lens which makes very large objects in the background appear much smaller, and rather small objects in the foreground appear very much larger. So you can all stop drooling or speculating as the case may be. :-))
Not only, texas canuck, is it a load of socialist crap, but it isn't a 'gift'. We, the taxpayer, are presumably paying for this surgery in Britain.
Strange, isn't it, how the feminists campaigned violently and viciously that 'women are not objects'; and ranted again and again that 'women are not sexual objects' - and the first thing that 'free women' often do, is not find a job, not take responsibility for their lives no matter what happens. But, remodel their bodies into sexual objects.
So, it's breast augmentation - which has nothing to do with a baby's needs - and probably disables those breasts as such - but has one agenda only. To make that woman a 'sexual objects'. I haven't heard any feminists opposed to this. Instead, the verbiage is 'well, it will make her 'feel' better about herself'. As a sexual object.
What about looking after her children, putting that money into an education account; not expecting the taxpayer to fork up the money; what about some education for herself; or, a down payment on a small flat. Wouldn't those make her 'feel better about herself'? No? Is it only being a 'sexual object' that does the trick?
But - the feminists ranted and raged against men, for 'making women into sexual objects'. And now, women are busily spending millions every year - on just that agenda. Hmmm.
How many goodly creatures are there here!
How beauteous mankind is!
O brave new world,
That has such people in it!
The Tempest (in a DDD cup)
I'm ruminating over an old quotation, "The perfect woman's breast should fit the cup of an honest man's hand."
Anyone know the origin of that one?
c.j.g. said:
"hate to take away from Toronto[not really] but they no longer have the biggest pole around.Abu Dhabi wins that honour and theirs is much beefier.it's usually called a building."
Ok... so Dhabi has the tallest tower, but if the subject closest to the camera were to fall over backwards Toronto would immediately become the site of the highest mountains east of the Rockies.
The EMPIRE STATE BUILDING is still a classic skyscrapper after all it was KING KONGS favorite stomping ground
Tits are for kids...
The Toronto picture was definitely photoshopped. From the CBC archives perhaps?
Oh, geez. If you want see young women with such over-proportions in the Toronto area, visit Canada's Wonderland any Friday evening. You will find plenty.
But, truth be told, I have sympathy for the woman pictured. In the flush of youth, her voluptuous figure may indeed attract men. But, should she choose a mate, there's a good chance that ten or fifteen years on, those currently enticing breasts will be, as Marlon Brando put it in "Last Tango in Paris", used for playing soccer. She will probably suffer back problems, find it hard to find bras and clothes to fit her, and still constantly be subject to lewd remarks, as if large breasts equal loose morals.
My best friend suffered from the same syndrome in some way; he was very smart, but also very good looking. He could pick up girls with a smile, but I remember him saying "Yeah, but all they're interested in is the pretty face." He wanted to have a real relationship, but most girls couldn't get past the physical (as in the "show off" to their girlfriends who has the cutest boyfriend.)
Hey I recognize that girl from the Sun calandar but there it says she's a "dental hygenist" who some times acts and runs her own entertainment company?
Is she selling silicone?
for those interested and just to show i don't know the difference between Abu Dhabi and Dubai.[www.burjdubai.com].this structure is slated to top out at 2600 feet.
I can't imagine how cold to the touch those tits are...
Smart women prefer not to plant time-bombs in their body.
Uninformed women fail to realize that while pert breasts look good to strangers and the camera, they are unnaturally hard.
Most men prefer natural. = TG