Ahmadasajihad

Sooner or later, boom! I wonder when the world will wake up and realize what this nutbar is all about.
http://www.thedemolitiondj.nl/images/atom-bomb-orange2.gif

"I hereby demand that all the peoples declare their position regarding these crimes"

OK. Israel attempts to live peaceably with her neighbours. Her neighbours make public declarations that she is to be destroyed. My position is that Israel is right, and the Islamofascists are wrong.

Memri TV has got the scoops.
Interesting how talks of native Americans brings chants of "Death to America". I guess the idea of a peace treaty is alien to Iranians.
After all, "America should be ruled by the Native Americans who are there today". Special tax-status and casinos are not enough!

At any rate, Iranians will know what a Tomahawk, Apache and Blackhawk are soon enough...

Once again, it's not a problem a couple of well placed cruise missiles would fix, and, with no long term commitment. The MSM muslim sympathizers would scream like an organ grinders monkeys but what else is new, who cares.

I guess this must be his answer to the U.N.'s demands, that he give up his nuclear ambitions. Rally was same day.

Maybe he sent Bin Laden's son with a hot potatoe and a one-way ticket to Lebanon and martyrdom.

"Our goal is focused on Iran."

hdgreene said...

Hezbollah is fighting for the Caliphate and the utter destruction of Israel. These goals are not compatible with a Democratic Lebanon. Also, Hezbollah has sold its soul (for a good price, it is true) to Iran. So Lebanese who want a free and independent Lebanon will have to fight for it and always against Hezbollah. But it is easier to blame the US, isn't it?

Hezbollah is a serious threat -- because it is an agent of Iran and has terror cells located all over the world. They had to be neutralized to take on Iran and their nukes.

Our goal is focused on Iran. The fact that they build up a terror client and equipped it with such sophisticated weapons is, in a sense, a strong argument for our side. I think this is especially true of the anti-ship cruise missiles. I don't think the world navies looked upon that Hezbollah Iran operation as a cute little "Pirates of Penzance" operetta. Those missiles could threaten shipping at choke points all over the world -- Horn of Africa and Indonesia are obvious examples -- and guess which navy keeps the shipping lanes open?

I'm still struck by the lack of massive demonstrations and anti-American riots. Of course, I'm getting my news from PJ media. Maybe they are just not reporting on all that violence in the Paris Suburbs. Ten thousand cars burn and where is the news in that? Normal for August. Did the US embassy in Kuala lumpur burn down last week? Just wondering. ...-
belmont club

chalk up another one to the useless UN and more than useless SG annan

"Iran and Syria have decided to take their stand in Lebanon."

Tehran & Damascus Move to Lebanon

Walid Phares on the Mideast

Excerpt:

Lopez: What should/can be done about Syria and Iran?

Phares: What should have been done about these two regimes is one thing; what can be done about them now is something else. Bad advice has been given by Western and American academic elites, beginning in the 1980s, about jihadism and the regimes that supported it. In my book Future Jihad I argue that the international community and the West are paying the price of bad decisions or indecisions in the 1990s, after the collapse of the Soviet Union. In American classrooms, instructors who were supposed to be the experts on the region praised the Assad regime and considered Hezbollah a resistance movement, not a jihadi terror group. Many businessmen and diplomats viewed Iran’s leadership as realist and capable of engagement in the 1990s. A complete myopia was dominant in our international policy, with implications for our national security. This began to change after 9/11, but not without an astounding debate revealing weaknesses in our political establishment’s vision of the world. Nevertheless, at this point in time the two regimes have revealed to the world that they are a real axis of menace. Two things are to be done at this point:

First, defeat this axis in Lebanon at any price and with the support of the Lebanese people. That is crucial because Tehran and Damascus have decided to make their stand in Lebanon.

Then, isolate these regimes and provide endless support to the reformists in their countries until change is initiated by the people. ...-
http://www.paulding.net/bin/url.cgi/13363.3

Thanks maz2. I agree with Phares's analysis and his suggestions.

I was not aware of the immense number of zionist indoctrinated dimwitts in the "new" Conservative Party,until I read some of the blogs posted on this site.So much ignorance concentrated in one party !!! One must wonder if this ignorance is from the top down or from the bottom up ,in either case it manifests itself in the ignorant statements comming out of Harper's mouth.

give them what they want ...if they can catch!

I agree too, but do you realy think there will be much support from the Lebanese people?

This guy is another Hitler;

The CTV news today showed a demonstration of children in Tehran, and explained that they were demonstrating the death of innocent children in Lenanon: I thought how irresponsible to parrot this propaganda from an evil regime;

then they reported on the funeral of a Canadian soldier who died in Aphganistan in Montreal: the reporter indicated that the funeral became "political" when the deceased's father stated that he was proud of the mission etc...in his eulogyl. I dispaired that they would add this kind of sceptical editorializing to our own, and allow crass Iranian propaganda propaganda unquestioningly.

What is going on? Whose side is the MSM on? What can be done?

i suppose Iran moves to the top of the list of being turned into glass ahead of North Korea.

Bushman did you catch this; "When I see the behavior of America, England, and their other accomplices in recent days"?

Or the part about Native North Americans?

"I was not aware of the immense number of zionist indoctrinated dimwitts in the "new" Conservative Party"
You had me at "I was not aware".
Idiot.

I'm still mad at the Iranians for conquering the Mesopotanians.
Seriously, like the Nazis, the mullahcrats are not rational. Intelligent, yes, rational, no. And they may have the bomb.

The fact that you can not rationalize with these maniacs is what's so scary. If there was a chance in hell of getting through to the population as a whole, I would say hold your fire. How do you reason with someone who believes they will be greeted by Allah by taking their own lives and that of innocents? Or a mother who would encourage that?

Yesha Rabbinical Council: During time of war, enemy has no innocents

The Yesha Rabbinical Council announced in response to an IDF attack in Kfar Qanna that "according to Jewish law, during a time of battle and war, there is no such term as 'innocents' of the enemy."

"All of the discussions on Christian morality are weakening the spirit of the army and the nation and are costing us in the blood of our soldiers and civilians," the statement said.

www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3283720,00.html

I'm not going there Bob. When aren't they at war? When does a Palestinian suicide bomber decide this isn't war, it's just for kicks?

The innocents who died on 9-11 were war casualties?

Hurry. Get the T-shirt before it's too late.

There was a troll in a recent post. I was going to offer a clever rebuttal but then I saw a shiny thing!

Do you get the feeling that the touchy feelies in the libs and dippers would like us to sacrifice Israel to appease the terrorists?

Then what?

We sit on our asses congratulating ourselves on being neutered neutrals, waiting for our friendly neighbourhood suicide bomber.

From ctv website polling. How would you rate the Harper government's handling of its first major foreign policy crisis?


Good 22583 votes (69 %)

Fair 2421 votes (7 %)

Poor 7789 votes (24 %

But a decima poll apparently sees things differently.
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060728/mideast_conservative_poll_060728/20060802?hub=Canada

If the liberals were in power, we would now be taking a firm but "nuanced" position, advocating a peaceful dialogue, with a psychopathic homocidal maniac, intent on wiping out the only democratic nation, in the middle east.

Wow! I do believe that Ahmadinejad and I agree on something... the UN is useless.

Other than that, this guy's cheese has definitly slipped off the cracker. His history lesson was different to say the least. I also find that he whines about the UN not calling for a ceasefire but I must have missed the part where hezbollah or Iran asked.

To all listening moonies (that's an oxymoron if I ever heard one), so where do you start to communicate with this joker?

"Do you get the feeling that the touchy feelies in the libs and dippers would like us to sacrifice Israel to appease the terrorists?" Ah yes.
“Iran is the only country in the world that has now had six elections since the first election of President Khatami (in 1997). (It is) the only one with elections, including the United States, including Israel, including you name it, where the liberals, or the progressives, have won two-thirds to 70 percent of the vote in six elections: Two for president; two for the Parliament, the Majlis; two for the mayoralties. In every single election, the guys I identify with got two-thirds to 70 percent of the vote. There is no other country in the world I can say that about, certainly not my own.” http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=14943_Clinton_Apologized_to_Iran&only=yes

The muzzies seem to think the only problem with the world is that those effin' jooos won't roll over and stay dead.

The IDF has to win this war, or in a few years yo' mammy is going to be burqua shopping.

The way I see it, we (democracy) have a big problem. It is the Main Stream Media. MSM They see their job as creating controversy and then perpetuating it. It is as if they do not want countries to run smoothly. Have politicians control everything, even if they screw up. And screw up they do.

How much fun, and profit, would there be for the MSM if the news was as follows;

CRIME IS WELL CONTROLLED NOW, THUGS ARE ALL OFF THE STREET. NO MORE SOFT SENTENCES.

POPULATION LIVING IN HARMONY. NO CULTURAL CONFLICT, WE ARE ALL JUST CANADIANS.

VICTIM'S RIGHTS NOW GREATER THAN PERPETRATORS. COURT ROOMS ARE EMPTY.

SUCCESS IS NOW REWARDED MORE THAN FAILURE. LOTS OF INCENTIVE TO NOT SCREW UP OR TAKE THE SLACK-ASS WAY OUT.

CIVIL SERVANTS ARE NOW ALLOWED TO JUST DO THEIR JOB, WITHOUT SINISTER MOTIVES FROM ABOVE.

ENVIRONMENT CANADA IS JUST REPORTING ON THE WEATHER, NOT MAKING US FEEL GUILTY ABOUT THIRD WORLD DICTATORS SELF INDUCED PROBLEMS.

NO MORE HOAXES TO REPORT ON AS THE MSM DOES NOT PERPETUATE THEM ANYMORE.

MEDIA POLLS HAVE BEEN OUTLAWED SINCE THEY WERE FOUND GUILTY OF MANUFACTURING RESULTS WITH DUBIOUS DATA.

THE PARLIAMENTARY PRESS GALLERY DOES NOT EXIST ANY MORE AS CANADIANS GET THEIR INFORMATION DIRECTLY FROM VARIOUS WEB SITES.

THERE ARE FAR FEWER NEWS STORIES NOW THAT THE MEDIA CAN NO LONGER SIMPLY QUOTE A "SOURCE". THEY HAVE TO REVEALE A PERSON'S NAME.

THERE HAVE BEEN NO POLLS FOR A LONG TIME NOW. EVER SINCE THE MEDIA WAS REQUIRED TO REVEALE THE NAMES OF THOSE POLLED TO INDEPENDENT AUDITORS.

SEVENTY FIVE PERCENT OF MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS CLOSED AS THE COUNTRY IS RUNNING SMOOTHLY. MOSTLY JUST GOOD NEWS TO REPORT.

FEWER CLASSES AT JOURNALISM SCKOOLS NOW THAT ONLY REPORTING IS TAUGHT. SPIN CLASSES HAVE BEEN FOUND TREASONIST.

FORESTS HAVE BECOME OVER GROWEN. NO MORE NEWSPAPERS.

What a wonderfull world it would be.

Thanks for that Greg. Makes you wonder how much respect he has for the democratically elected Hamas.

texas,

As I said in a previous post there's only one type of person you can't communicate with and that's the insane.

This is what he is all about:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6162397493278181614

other greg, re:Liberals' nuance,
examples abound. How about letting Canadian citizens rot in Saudi jails(Sampson), or better yet even killed in Iran(Kazemi), all without consequence to the offending regimes. Meanwhile Chretien sprung Kahdr out of Pakistan and we consistently abstained from those lopsided UN votes singling out Israel for censure. I guess all of that was offset by saying that Israel was entitled to live in peace.
How pathetic.

other greg, re:Liberals' nuance,
examples abound. How about letting Canadian citizens rot in Saudi jails(Sampson), or better yet even killed in Iran(Kazemi), all without consequence to the offending regimes. Meanwhile Chretien sprung Kahdr out of Pakistan and we consistently abstained from those lopsided UN votes singling out Israel for censure. I guess all of that was offset by saying that Israel was entitled to live in peace.

How pathetic.

david browbshirt said "only one type of person you can't communicate with and that's the insane." Sounds like every LIBERANO in the country.

SUPPORT ISRAEL
SUPPORT FREEDOM

I agree that this guy is a Hitler wannabe. But how did Hitler come to power?

He capitalized on some very legitimate grievances of the people. In his case, it was the Treaty of Versailles, and how unjust it was.

Admidinejad (sp) is using some very real injustices to further his cause. I don't see why we shouldn't right those injustices and therefore remove his power to sway his people?

Would that be too much to ask?