That's very cute.I wonder how many of them socked away their paycheques from last season just in case they had to go a year without any income? If they are at all like Theo Fleury, not likely.I have a relation who's brother is a well known player agent, and the stories of excess and stupidity in how players handled their finances, is endless.Denis Savard sure liked to invest in some dumb things ;-)
This is a fight over who gets the bigger piece of the economic pie - the owners or the players - and as someone who lived through the Harold Ballard years, who tunes in to see Mats Sundin and Gary Roberts play, but not to see Leaf management do a crappy job, it really is an easy call.
If some teams paid too much money for player that turned out to be stiffs, that's their tough luck. Giving them the right to collude is not the answer IMHO.
And I'd rather that a few teams fail, causing the league to contract. That would result in better hockey.
The players take over 75% of revenues, and unlike the NFL, have guaranteed contracts.The owners of capital take all the risks,cannot depreciate the salaries,nor subject players to free market competition.The NHL business model stinks because the risk goes only one way.
Why this blog? Until this moment
I have been forced
to listen while media
and politicians alike
have told me
"what Canadians think".
In all that time they
never once asked.
This is just the voice
of an ordinary Canadian
yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
homepage email Kate (goes to a private
mailserver in Europe)
I can't answer or use every
tip, but all are
appreciated!
"I got so much traffic afteryour post my web host asked meto buy a larger traffic allowance."Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you
send someone traffic,
you send someone TRAFFIC.
My hosting provider thought
I was being DDoSed. -
Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generatedone-fifth of the trafficI normally get from a linkfrom Small Dead Animals."Kathy Shaidle
"Thank you for your link. A wave ofyour Canadian readers came to my blog! Really impressive."Juan Giner -
INNOVATION International Media Consulting Group
I got links from the Weekly Standard,Hot Air and Instapundit yesterday - but SDA was running at least equal to those in visitors clicking through to my blog.Jeff Dobbs
"You may be anasty right winger,but you're not nastyall the time!"Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collectingyour welfare livelihood."Michael E. Zilkowsky
That's very cute.I wonder how many of them socked away their paycheques from last season just in case they had to go a year without any income? If they are at all like Theo Fleury, not likely.I have a relation who's brother is a well known player agent, and the stories of excess and stupidity in how players handled their finances, is endless.Denis Savard sure liked to invest in some dumb things ;-)
Damn.... I'll take two if they do windows.
There's a really funny audio version out there somewhere. If someone spots it, let me know - I heard the piece on radio today, and it's priceless.
I side with the players.
This is a fight over who gets the bigger piece of the economic pie - the owners or the players - and as someone who lived through the Harold Ballard years, who tunes in to see Mats Sundin and Gary Roberts play, but not to see Leaf management do a crappy job, it really is an easy call.
If some teams paid too much money for player that turned out to be stiffs, that's their tough luck. Giving them the right to collude is not the answer IMHO.
And I'd rather that a few teams fail, causing the league to contract. That would result in better hockey.
Screw the players, screw the owners - they're all over paid.
It's not like they've invented a battery that will last as long as a Pink Floyd tape or anything.
The players take over 75% of revenues, and unlike the NFL, have guaranteed contracts.The owners of capital take all the risks,cannot depreciate the salaries,nor subject players to free market competition.The NHL business model stinks because the risk goes only one way.